User talk:A1lifestyle

Welcome!

Hello, A1lifestyle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your userpage

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline because it looks like an article which is something not allowed per WP:FAKEARTICLE.. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively you may add {{Db-u1}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, we are Team Andreia Brazier who manages and handles Andreia Brazier careers and coordination. We could provide all necessary documents requested for the Article to be published. We also created the webpage www.AndreiaBrazier.com.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A1lifestyle (talk • contribs) 16:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC+9)

Hi A1lifestyle. Your post indicates a couple of potential problems when it comes to Wikipedia editing.

Wikipedia accounts are not allowed to be shared by multiple users per WP:NOSHARE. If you are as you describe yourself a "team" of editors, then I strongly recommend that each member of your team create an individual account for editing.
Since you (and your team) are trying to edit/create articles about someone or something you have a connection to, Wikipedia considers you to have a conflict of interest. COI is not expressly prohibited by Wikipedia, but it's hard to adhere to Wikipedia's five pillars when you editing/creating connect about something/someone you're closely connected to. I strongly suggest you carefully read through Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide because there are expectations/limitations placed upon COI editors by the Wikipedia community and you might avoid problems with other editors familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines.
Wikipedia also does not allow editors to use multiple accounts to edit, except in certain specific cases. Switching back and forth between accounts may give others the impression that you are different people and might be seen as sock puppetry. I am only bring this up because your response above is almost identical to what User:Andreiabrazier 78 posted here at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Although Wikipedia is all for collaborative editing where editors work together to try and improve the quality of the encyclopedia, it does not all editors to work together is way to try and subvert or game the system. This is known as meat pupperty and is not allowed.
Wikipedia articles are neither owned by the subjects they are written about nor the editors who edit/create them. The fact that you or your team may represent Braizer does not give you any final say or editorial control over what information is added or removed from any article which may be written about her. If someday an article about Brazier is added to Wikipedia, it is basically free for anyone in the world who has an Internet connection to edit at anytime. In other words, there is a downside to Wikipedia that you should understand.
Your response did not indicate you understood the warning I gave you about your user page. Wikipedia user pages must comply with Wikipedia:User pages. Wikipedia editors do not own their user pages, so they may be edited at anytime by another editor. Experienced editors will generally refrain from editing another editor's user page alone, unless there is some serious policy/guideline violation which require immediate intention. User pages like yours which look like articles are not allowed and may be deleted per WP:U5. So, I suggest you bring your user page more in line with Wikipedia's guidelines before an administrator deletes it.

Some other things which will make editing and communicating with other editors easier. Please read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines because talk pages are how editors communicate with each other so knowing how to use them is important. In particular, please always try to remember to sign your posts (there's a simple to do so using 4 tilde) and the software will automatically add your username and a time stamp.

If you have any questions about the above or general questions about editing, you can most likely always find someone to answer them at the Wikipedia:Teahouse. Good luck with your draft. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:A1lifestyle

A tag has been placed on User:A1lifestyle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 08:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andreia Brazier (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft lacks any references. It also lacks a proper lede sentence identifying its subject. Please do not resubmit drafts without addressing the comments by the reviewers. That is tendentious.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andreia Brazier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:53, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]