User talk:A.A.Hoffmann

Welcome!

Hello, A.A.Hoffmann, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!

Hello,

let me introduce myself, Graeme Bartlett as an on-line ambassador to your Wikipedia work. I am here to help you with the Wikipedia technical and social world. You can ask me questions or chat to me on my talk page at User talk:Graeme Bartlett, or you can email me by using this page: Special:EmailUser/Graeme Bartlett. I will be looking at your work on Wikipedia to see what I can suggest to you. Once your page goes live I will see if I can nominate it for the WP:Did you know to get it listed on the front page. I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:57, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions from An Li

(1) The article seems heavily rely on the Hudec et al 2007. More references might be better. (2) For the discussion of salt surface structure, the section can be organized as 1) geometry 2) kinematics and 3) mechanism sub-sections. (3) A new section about application or implication of salt surface structure. (4) Need more figures. Upload image to wiki Commons and insert image into this article. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geologyanli (talk • contribs) 15:11, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don's comments and review

First Section

First sentence: "Salt surface structures are extensions of salt tectonics" I think it is simpler to just say "Salt surface structures are extensions of salt structures that reach the surface. You may also want to note that by reaching the surface, the forces and pressures that drive the salt structures change significantly, so it forms unique structures. You may also want to move the navigation panel below the first section, though that is just a style opinion. In general, with the overview section, keep in mind that most Wikipedia readers want to find your page, grab the info they are looking for, and leave quickly

Evolution histories

In general, good. Seems to cover the common salt structures. Figure is deeply needed though, I can only parse the sentences because I read that paper a few weeks ago. For someone coming in with no knowledge, this would be a very inaccessible description. Also make sure you link words with double brackets! like this: potatoes

Types of surface structures

Again, good overview. This section does not suffer as much from the lack of figures, however i recall there was a very good figure in the hudec paper that had images of all the different structures

overview

I think accessibility and connectivity are your biggest areas to improve in. To make your article more accessible you can make two improvements:

Nice big figures to help visualize the different structures
Find a balance between geological terminology and more layman's terms

You can make the article more connected by, as I said earlier, linking your words with their respective articles, this would also help if you find you cant reduce past the geological terminology, making it a link allows a reader to go learn what that fancy word means! Drhood2938 (talk) 16:39, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions from Chang

For the introduction, it is simple and clear. It will be better to demonstrate a figure of salt surface structure and some pictures of how it looks from outside

In the evolution part, I think 1) each of the piercement needs a example, for example any place matches up with active piercement how it is developed with the local tectonic evolution. 2)They definitely will look better with a figure to show people how each formed. Here is a figure I found, it may be helpful http://books.google.com/books?id=ihny39BvVhIC&pg=PA383&lpg=PA383&dq=active+piercement+salt&source=bl&ots=EhhGrZm2Ie&sig=ZNv5ovvHhZbOldXmDjyhlLDIddM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lzc7VPKSL6Ka8QGix4GwDw&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=active%20piercement%20salt&f=false -Chang

In the types of surface structure, it still need some figures to demonstrate each one better. the last part of "trust Advance" could be expanded with more information, for example the three driving process. -Chang

Overall, the whole page has a simple and clear structure of salt surface structure. I suggest 1) Add more figures and pictures 2) more information of each part is needed. it should have some specific example to each definition. 3) There should be some potential research direction about this, like something people cares but has a weak understanding. more deeply information is necessary. -Chang

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salt surface structures has been accepted

Salt surface structures, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:09, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to comments on your commons talk page

At your talk page on Wikimedia Commons you have been asked to provide more information about several of your uploaded images. They appear to have been taken without changes from the original work of Hudec and Jackson. Unless you can show that you have permission from these authors, the images will be deleted from commons. Mikenorton (talk) 21:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Salt surface structures

On 20 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Salt surface structures, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that salt surface structures include the extrusive advance structure where salt flows under gravitational pressure? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Salt surface structures. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 12:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Surface salt techtonics image upload test.jpg

The file File:Surface salt techtonics image upload test.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]