User talk:A-Confirmed

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Funcrunch (talk) 19:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Trans woman, you may be blocked from editing. Funcrunch (talk) 19:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 21:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked? Indefinitely? What the heck? Care to explain? A-Confirmed (talk) 14:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A-Confirmed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To put it simply, the reason for unblocking me is that there was no good reason to block me in the first place. I wasn't rude, I wasn't trans- or whatever else-phobic. I went to the talk page first before making any edits on the main page and expressed my opinion there referring to the Wikipedia's own definitions. And I get banned just like that? Wow. A-Confirmed (talk) 17:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are confused. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a chat forum. We aren't interested in your opinions here. Yamla (talk) 18:01, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed to banned user, Homme. --Yamla (talk) 18:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]