User talk:96.42.26.63

December 2023

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 16:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe removing misinformation is incredibly constructive. 96.42.26.63 (talk) 16:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marxist cultural analysis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to make edits with misleading or inaccurate edit summaries, even if unintentional, as you did at Marxist cultural analysis, you may be blocked from editing. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiDionysius I'd like to formally ask you to stop promoting misleading and inaccurate information on this site. You clearly do not know what you're editing into these pages, and as such are causing harm to the site as a whole. If you think any of my edits are mistaken in nature, I'd invite you to stop copy-pasting onto this talk page, and put a bit of effort into discussing the specific changes. Thank you. 96.42.26.63 (talk) 16:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are removing sourced information. Your first edit asserted that the source does not support the information it is attached to. This is not true. The source does very explicitly support it (as do dozens of other sources out there, mind you). Even if it didn't, the proper procedure would be to mark the source as having vailed verification, and seek another source, not just to delete it. Even regardless of all of that, removing information you disagree with is patently not "removing vandalism", so warning you for an inaccurate edit summary was appropriate. If you remain convinced of the rightness of your point of view, I'd invite you to take it to the article talk page. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.