User talk:900R

This is 900R's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Hello 900R! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Hipal (talk) 18:54, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Starboy Entertainment (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

They've only released a single album so far. Perhaps too soon.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Starboy Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:13, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 900R! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:13, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Starboy Entertainment (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nothing but promotional, plus, subject is not notable yet.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Starboy Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A lengthy welcome

Hi 900R. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 18:54, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Thank You

But you can help me work on Trey Smith's Draft

If you feel it's not well organised. 900R (talk) 19:33, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest focusing first on the references. Any reference that fails WP:BLP requirements should be removed. At a glance, that would the majority of them. To get started, remove all those listed as inappropriate at WP:RSP, along with the corresponding article content based upon those references. --Hipal (talk) 20:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

okay, but you can still help by editing it too, please

Thank You 900R (talk) 20:39, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to do the same with Yung Miami. --Hipal (talk) 21:13, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've requested Yung Miami be moved to draftspace. Why did you create the redirect? --Hipal (talk) 18:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can help me correct Yung Miami's article

I will be grateful if you help me out. You a higher and higher than me here, so pls help me out. Thank You. 900R (talk) 18:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello 900R. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:900R. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=900R|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. - Hipal (talk) 19:41, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not paid to edit or create an article, neither compensated.

You can help me out, pls be me mentor here. Thank You!! 900R (talk) 05:43, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you fluent in English? --Hipal (talk) 19:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, still learning 900R (talk) 20:45, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hello 900R. You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access to the channel.

900R (talk) 10:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not skilled enough with English to participate here, you may wish to edit the version of Wikipedia that is in your primary language. There is nothing special about the English Wikipedia, it is not the premier Wikipedia. Once your English skills improve, you can return. There is also the Simple English Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 10:46, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Thank you, I'ma go Simple English Wikipedia. 900R (talk) 14:43, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Hilspress per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hilspress. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 18:44, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not User:Hilspress, I dont even know what you are talking about, check well please.

I'm sorry if I violated.

Thank You 900R (talk) 06:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

900R (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That block is no longer necessary because I understand what I was blocked for. Please, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead. Thank You. Please Temper Justice with Mercy @ User:UtherSRG 900R (talk) 07:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please demonstrate your understanding of this by telling us what you did wrong, what you will do differently, and what edits you intend to make. If you are Hilspress, you need to request unblock from that account. 331dot (talk) 09:42, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock appeal 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

900R (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know what I did was wrong because I moved a draft to article without permission, I'm deeply sorry for that. This time I won't move any; I won't violate Wikipedia rules. Pls I'm not User:Hilspress, this is me User:900R. Thank you User:331dot 900R (talk) 10:06, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Plutoisactive. Yamla (talk) 12:09, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts, not moving a draft. A mere denial is insufficient, as every sock puppet denies it. 331dot (talk) 10:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have any account again apart from this >>> User:900R, you can go through it. Please, I dont know who User:Hilspress is. I was just tryna help but unfortunately I violated. I will be grateful if you unblock, I won't repeat it again.@ User:331dot 900R (talk) 10:46, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not every comment needs to be an unblock request, only one open request is needed. 331dot (talk) 11:05, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]