Jump to content

User talk:87.85.176.46

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


September 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Christian Lacroix, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pine Island Glacier. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- 7D HMS (talk) 13:05, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Annual percentage rate with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nepenthes (talk) 08:59, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Annual percentage rate with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nepenthes (talk) 09:00, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Annual percentage rate with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Nepenthes (talk) 09:01, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Annual percentage rate. Nepenthes (talk) 09:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 09:24, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Saints Row: The Third has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ALLOCKE|talk 10:42, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Roman emperors, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

January 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Thames Gateway, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Codeine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Codeine with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  Velella  Velella Talk   09:29, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to One-child policy, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Racism in the United States. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 13:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sahil Khan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shuipzv3 (talk) 08:45, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dixy Chicken, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dixy Chicken was changed by 87.85.176.46 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.977746 on 2012-05-08T09:07:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:07, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Piri piri. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:09, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at High school, you may be blocked from editing. ÐℬigXЯaɣ 13:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jacks, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jacks was changed by 87.85.176.46 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959757 on 2012-05-16T13:05:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 10:37, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Liquidity trap, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Liquidity trap was changed by 87.85.176.46 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954112 on 2012-06-25T14:10:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Vrenator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to FIFA 13, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Vrenator talk 13:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Electromagnet, you may be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:02, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Electromagnet, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GoShow (............................) 16:20, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your article submission J Sammy

[edit]

Hello 87.85.176.46. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled J Sammy.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/J Sammy}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:19, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joe Layburn concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joe Layburn, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 04:30, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:87.85.176.46&oldid=1141586349"