User talk:80AaronHunter80

I love Userboxes. User:80AaronHunter80/Userbox/Lava User:80AaronHunter80/Userbox/good user User:80AaronHunter80/Userbox/hey User:80AaronHunter80/Userbox/Dishes

Thanks

Hi! I noticed that your using some of the userboxes I made. Thank you! I like it when people are using what I made. A colorful girl (talk) 22:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitted without any improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:A colorful girl/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 80AaronHunter80! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

You are very nice because you used some of the UBXs I made. (UBX is short for userbox)

I hope you like it. (Honestly I prefer soft cakey brownies; it doesn't matter which kind you want. It's magic and becomes whichever texture you want.) A colorful girl (talk) 18:09, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thank you! I was craving for brownies soooooo long! I looooove you! Yum! Munch munch munch munch munch munch. Thank you!!! 80AaronHunter80 (talk) 18:13, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanking

Why do you keep thanking me for all of my edits? It's nice, but it's also bothering me. A colorful girl (talk) 18:25, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I just really really happy for your birthday! I also think your edits are super good! Your a really good editor! So is it okay? Thanks! 80AaronHunter80 (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my birthday. Also, my edits are no better than yours. I would like this to stop. If you keep doing this, it might have an opposite effect. Instead of happy about it, I'll be annoyed. A colorful girl (talk) 18:32, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then why did you by a birthday cake when its not your birthday? You even invited me to the party! 80AaronHunter80 (talk) 18:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hilokid/Userbox/fun hey wanna link my profile? Come on, dude! Its fun!

80AaronHunter80 (talk) 18:49, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gacha club (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gacha club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:41, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to fix the refrences, is it good now? Thanks! 80AaronHunter80 (talk) 00:58, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gacha club (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This still doesn't show notability for this game. Needs critical review by major game magazines / websites as listed in the reliable sources section of WP:VG/RS

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gacha club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 02:52, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It just seems too hard, i am not very good at editing. I am still a beginner. Because im not vey good at it, can you help make it better? 80AaronHunter80 (talk) 03:00, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gacha Club (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Gacha club, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

please update on this draft, i've moved the content to this link

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gacha Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 02:59, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gacha Club (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gacha Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:59, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Friends?

I just noticed how much we are helping each other. I went to help you with your Gacha club draft which I'm sure you made because of my Gacha life draft. We are also giving each other wiki-loves. Friends? A colorful girl (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YES! thanks! Lets be a TEAM!! We can work out articles together! 80AaronHunter80 (talk) 15:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hilokid/Userbox/fun 80AaronHunter80 (talk) 15:25, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Order for ice cream

Could you give me a Cookie Dough ice cream userbox? On your user page, you said we can order ice cream in the form of UBXs. Can the image be a scoop of ice cream with a cookie? Can the text say "This user has ordered Cookie Dough Ice cream from 80AaronHunter80"? Can the text be black/dark purple/dark blue? Can the UBX background be cookie dough colored? Thanks! It's okay if it's not exactly how I want it. A colorful girl (talk) 15:52, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Working on it!✅ 80AaronHunter80 (talk) 15:56, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:80AaronHunter80/Userbox/Ice cream order 80AaronHunter80 (talk) 16:15, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank you! The text looks even better when it's brown! It's perfect! Thanks again! Bye! A colorful girl (talk) 16:23, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gacha Club refs

The draft has two refs. The first is to the game website, which does not contribute to notability, and really should not be used at all. The second (gachalife) is to a website name that is for sale. It is essential to have references that support factual statements and are independent to the game. David notMD (talk) 19:22, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:34, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first account ever!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

80AaronHunter80 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Did you know that this is my first account ever? I have no idea why I got blocked! I was making very good contributions but, suddenly I got blocked. Can someone please tell me why I got blocked? And one more time, I will tell you that this is my first account ever! 80AaronHunter80 (talk) 12:13, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. You aren't even very subtle about it. Yamla (talk) 12:38, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Eggs & egos

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

80AaronHunter80 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am angry. This literally is my first account in my entire life!!! 😠😠😠👿👿👿😡😡😡😤😤😫😫😫😫😫😡😡😡. Can I please be unblocked because I don't see ANY REASON THAT I AM BLOCKED!?!? I will say ONE MORE TIME, I AM AAAAAAANGRY!!!!!!!!😠😠😠😠😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😤😤😤😡😡😠😡😡😡😠😤😤😤😤😫😫😫😫😫😫 There is NOOOOOOOOOOOO REASON THAT I AM RELATED TO 😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😡AARON$BITCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😵😡😡!!!!!! Hey Llama!!! This is LITERALLY THE OPPOSITE OF COMFIRMED SOCK POOPETRY!!!!!!!!😡😡😡😡😡😡😠😡😡

80AaronHunter80 (talk) 16:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Thanks for making it easy. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:45, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

80AaronHunter80 (talk) 16:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.