Jump to content

User talk:80.200.232.89

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CaptainEek. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gallic Wars have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 23:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Endsieg, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AgisdeSparte (talk) 19:41, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to University of Antwerp. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 18:43, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Milei

[edit]

Good Afternoon,

I thought it easier to talk through the edit here. My concern with your language is that it comes off as a value laden. IE that this is more "authentic" is a value judgement. Look, I agree with you that the context of this brining economic activity into the mainstream really shows that the rise in poverty is somewhat ephemeral and the reduced transaction costs of legitimate markets will likely increase the standard of living. But, to make that assessment here is original research. If there is a legitimate source (and I'm sure there is if you look) that says that, this could be a legitimate add, but we can't make that kind of assessment based on our personal understandings of economics.


Squatch347 (talk) 16:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see now. Yeah, fair enough. Thanks for letting me know :) 2A02:A020:550:89D2:4257:59B5:5C58:AB10 (talk) 01:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]