Hi im Sana khan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vipzzzzz (talk • contribs) 06:11, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Space for discussion

Lee Addy

No me don't, but Wikipedia:Verifiability want. And btw article fram french wikipedia can't be used as source.--Oleola (talk) 22:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK

Ok, but they was wrote this information before 5 months, and it is accepted.--7even.up (talk) 14:01, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Sánchez

Hey 7even.up, the general consensus on wikipedia is that we do not change a sportsmans "current club" until the deal actually goes through; in the case of Sánchez, he has still to have his medical and sign his contract which should all take place (hopefully) by Monday. The article will be updated then to reflect this. Cheers, doomgaze (talk) 18:58, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Understand

Thanks for instructions. --7even.up (talk) 19:01, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. doomgaze (talk) 19:06, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there 7even.up, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:7even.up. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.
Shut off the bot here.
Report errors here.
If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand

What do I need to remove??--7even.up (talk) 15:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Marko Marin, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 18:46, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Odgovor

Pozdrav Gorane. Vidi, najvaznije je da infirmacije imaju izvor kako treba. U Leonardo Pisculichi clanku nemas nijedan izvor i onaj koji si postavio na mojoj strani je kopija wikipedije i to se ne vazi kao izvor. Drugo, predci od igraca nisu uopste puno bitni... zamisli kad bi svim igracima pisali sve predke? Covek je rodjen u Argentini i njihov je fudbaler, a ostalo je sve nagadjanje. Drugo, je si siguran da nije obrnuto, da nije mozda prezime Piskulić nastalo od Pisculichi? Bilo je i toga, cak i vise... ali svejedno to je malo bitno za clanak. Ako mozes da nadjes izvor i da se dokaze zasto je to vazno i zasto treba da bude u clanku, u redu, ali u principu upravo postoji velika tendencija u WP:FOOTY upravo u obrnutom smeru, da se fudbalerima ne komplikuju nacionalnosti jer ljudi ne zele da se bakcu sa ratovima je li poreklom srbin il je hrvat, je li mu deda kinez ili eskimo, to njih ne interesuje, interesuje nas fudbal i po cemu je poznat. Decko je Pisculichi i argentinac je.

Onda, za Eli Babalja nemas izvor da mu je ime Ilija. To je neko lansirao na komentarima kod nas u Srbiji ali to nema nigde potvrdjeno i cisto je nagadjanje za sada. Uostalom, on je poznat kao "Eli" i kao takav je igrao za mladu reprezentaciju Australije. I u prvoj recenici treba da stoji da je Australijski fudbaler, jer je predstavljao a i dalje predstavlja, Australiju, a ne Srbiju. Nize u clanku u sekciji o njegovom zivotu vec pise da je srbin iz Sarajeva, tamo je mesto tome.

Izvini, ne zelim stvarno lose da me shvatis, ali ja se apsolutno protivim takvom vrstom editovanja i to ne cini nikakvo dobro nasim editorima ovde jer samo nervira ostale i u sustini je propagiranje nacionalizma. Zar je bitno da li je "Ilija" ili "Eli"? Zar je bitno je li Pisculichiju deda Piskulic ili nije? Nekima kod nas mozda jeste, ali vecini u svetu stvarno nije, a ovo je engleska vikipedija namenjena njima. Siriti srpstvo svakom igracu koji ima neke korene iz naseg regiona stvarno nema smisla... Pa sta bi onda englezi trebali da rade? Vise od pola Amerike, Kanade, Australije su poreklom njihovi, pa onda bi i oni trebali da trce da upisuju to u sve clanke... Nema logike... Sto se nacionalnosti tice, igracima je najbitnije koju zemlju (reprezentaciju) predstavljaju pa posle gde su rodjeni. Onda u kojim klubovima igraju, sta su postigli u svojoj karijeri i sve ostale stvari po cemu su poznati. A Vikipedija ne podrzava uopste istrazivanje porodicnog korenja ljudi, porekla, i bilo kakva druga nacionalna editovanja. Pozdrav! FkpCascais (talk) 02:55, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vidi, da me ne shvatis lose, ako je Eli Babalju pravo ime Ilija stavicemo to u clanak, naravno, jer to je bitno jer se radi o pravom imenu coveka, ali za to nam je obavezno potreban barem jedan pouzdan izvor. Za sada sve sto znamo je da ljudi spominju kako je obicaj u Australiji da se nasem coveku zvanom Ilija da nadimak Eli, ali to nije dovoljno da bi mi to ubacili u enciklopedijski clanak, to su pusta nagadjanja, a za Wikipediju kao enciklopediju je vazno imati pouzdane informacije, nikako nagadjanja.

A sto se Pisculichija tice, nemas izvor, a i da nadjes, pitanje koliko je to bitno uopste, jer bi to u tom slucaju bilo samo poreklo njeogovg prezimena, sto i nije puno bitno za clanak o fudbaleru. Da je on tokom njegovog zivota promenio prezime, pa ajde, ali nije, on se rodio kao Pisculichi, argentinac je i nije puno ni bitno dalje odakle je poreklom. Pa u Australiji svaki gradjanin ima neko poreklo, zamisli kad bi svima to ubacivali? Nebitno... U slucaju Cvitanicha je samo bilo bitno jer ga je NS Hrvatske kontaktirao da igra za njih na osnovu njeogov hrvatskog porekla, pa zato postoji razlog toj prici o poreklu, a Pisculichi je druga potpuno prica. FkpCascais (talk) 03:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Živko Slijepčević

Samo da vam cestitam na clanku o Živku Slijepčeviću koji ste napravili. Da ne mislite da samo gledam negativne stvari, evo, dosao sam da vas pohvalim. Ne samo da se radi o osobi koja zasluzuje vec odavno da ima clanak, nego ste ga i vi dobro napravili. Ja sam samo neke stvari dodao i malo izmenio, evo mozete da vidite ovde. Nadam se da mi necete zameriti sto sam tekst malo promenio, mada mislim da je sadrzaj tacno onaj koji ste vi ostavili, samo sam malo izmenio nacin govora. Takodje, nasao sam na mojim listama njegovu statistiku iz Spartaka i otkrio da je bio u Trepci jednu polusezonu, pa sam i to dodao. Dodao sam isto klubove koje je trenirao koji su navedeni u ovom sajtu Playerhistory.com. Taj sajt je najpouzdaniji i najkompletniji za vecinu igraca iz celog sveta, problem je samo sto u zadnje vreme su zatvorili njihovu predhodnu adresu pa su presli na ovu novu. Nadam se da ce na njoj ostati, jer imaju najvecu bazu podataka o svetskom fudbalu sto postoji na netu, a i za nasu oblast bivse Juge su isto dosta dobri. Evo gde mozete da pronadjete bilo kog igraca: link. Problem je samo sto nema godine i golove, jer to je deo koji se placa da bi se imao pristup, ali iovako je dosta koristan. Inace, ja sam popunio godine ukrstajuci podatke koje imam sa B92 foruma, gde su statistike skinute sa zvanicnih Almanaha i poredjane u 3 strane gde su svi igraci iz Prve i Druge Savezne lige izmedju 1974 i 1991. Imam ja te linkove popisane ovde mozete slobodno da ih koristite i dodajte ako znate neki koji mi fali za statistiku o nasem fudbalu. Sto se Slijepcevica tice, dodao sam mu i kategorije koje su veoma korisne, a ostavio sam sa vama da vidim onaj link iz Sudouest sto ste postavili, stvar je u tome da meni ne otvara nikakav clanak, pa ne znam je li mozete mozda da nadjete tacnu adresu?

Uglavnom, izvinjavam se jos jednom ako sam bio neprijatan ranije i cestitam vam jos jednom na sjajnom clanku. Srdacan pozdrav! FkpCascais (talk) 05:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Izvinjavam se, ali ubacivanje slika su deo kojim se bas nikad nisam bavio. Videcu da li mogu da vidim nekoga ko zna pa da vam pomogne... FkpCascais (talk) 19:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richairo Živković, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

English Wikipedia

Please note that this is the English language Wikipedia, and all contributions should be in English, so that all members of the community can understand them. It is a mistake to think that messages posted to user talk pages are private conversations, and that other editors don't need to be able to understand them. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:38, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Onyilo

Vrlo bezobrazno i nekulturno sa tvoje strane. Moji doprinosi ovim stranicama su daleko obimniji i sezu puno dalje u proslost nego tvoje. Ukoliko imas potrebu da siljis alatku, zamolio bih te da to radis negde drugde. Sto se tice "spornog" clanka, vidim da si u proslosti vec popio dobronamerno upozorenje da ne menjas pripadnost igraca dok informacija ne postane zvanicna. Obzirom da je igrac promovisan u novom klubu pre manje od sat vremena, ne znam kojim cudom si ti jos jutros odlucio da promenis stranicu.

Ipak, pretpostavicu da si "vatreni navijac" jednog od dva rezimska kluba, pretpostavljam crvenog, pa jos i mogu da razumem ovakvo ponasanje. Ubuduce, budi siguran da cu ti pratiti promene i ukoliko ne budu argumentovane cu ih 'ladno brisati. Ne samo to, potrudicu se i da budes opominjan za nepostovanje pravila menjanja sadrzaja. Postoje korisnici wikipedije koji se trude da sadrzaji ovih stranica budu istiniti, ili barem sto blize istini. Na tebi je da odlucis da li ces postovati to.

Na kraju, iako smo nasu "komunikaciju" zapoceli na losim osnovama, nadam se da ces kvalitetno doprinositi kvalitetu clanaka. Sto se tice nase "komunikacije", nakon tvog inicijalnog kontakta, nadam se da prestaje ovog trenutka.

Bora83ns (talk) 14:08, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richairo Živković, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:35, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Your recent editing history at Ronaldo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. The current date for Ronaldo's birth is the consensus view of the editors working on that article. The explanation for the date is given in the note in the article and in the talk page discussion. If you disagree with the consensus view the appropriate thing to do now is to bring it up for discussion again. Thanks SQGibbon (talk) 19:42, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Watch this

I do not understand why you don't want to discuss the issue on the talk page. Did you not read the note provided in the article? Did you not read the discussions on the talk page? All of this explains the reason for the discrepancy and why the article uses the date it does. If you are going to participate on Wikipedia then you need to engage in discussion with editors when there is a disagreement. This is basic stuff. Please read the policy on consensus to understand. Also read up on edit warring since this is what you are doing. There is a stable consensus view and your continuously editing against the consensus view of your fellow editors is disruptive.

As to your examples, we are all aware of those claims and have discussed the issue many, many times. You are ignoring all the work that previous editors have put into this. Please stop and take the time to discuss the issue.

If you are not willing to work with your fellow editors then perhaps Wikipedia is not the place for you. SQGibbon (talk) 21:06, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, here is the quote from Wensley Clarkson's book 21 Years of Genius and 90 Minutes that Shook the World: "It wasn't until four days later that Nelio scraped together the $10 birth registration fee and, because he wanted to avoid being fined for failing to register it earlier, he declared that his son had been born on 22 September. But there was nothing unusual about this. More than one million births every year in Brazil are not registered at all. Ever since, Ronaldo has celebrated two birthdays every year. As far as his family are concerned, it's on 18 September. Officially, it's 22 September."

I hope this satisfies you. SQGibbon (talk) 21:19, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

7even.up, please be aware that if you continue to revert at Ronaldo an administrator could choose to block your account for WP:Edit warring. You have a user box which says you can participate with a near-native level of English. So there must be other reasons why you so seldom participate on Talk. We look forward to seeing you justifying your proposed change on talk pages and listening to other' responses. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:26, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And if is 22 September official date, why do you keep correcting. I thought that on this site are published official information, but I seem wrong.--7even.up (talk) 21:27, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Ivan Rakitić, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 23:40, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Liverpool F.C., without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ria Popović

The article Ria Popović has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this footballer meets WP:GNG or has played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 13:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, 7even.up. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]