User talk:76.98.179.251

December 2015

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ghost (1990 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 15:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2016

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 06:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jim Cummings. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 20:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:15, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of Jackie Chan Adventures characters. Binksternet (talk) 16:02, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanamonde (talk) 13:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

re Little Lulu

Hi. What's your source for these changes? Herostratus (talk) 14:42, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Good, the Bad, and Huckleberry Hound, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 22:25, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2017

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Tommy Chong. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. SparklingPessimist ^{Scream at me!} 16:42, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Histeria!. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Last notice

Though occasionally you make constructive changes[1][2], many of your other edits have been disruptive, and it seems like you've been at this for quite some time.

This edit at Talk:Histeria! serves no useful purpose. Talk pages aren't supposed to be used as sandboxes. What were you trying to achieve? You did the same thing in February 2016. Please explain this.
This content is unsourced, yet you've been asked numerous times not to add content without providing sources. Where did this information come from?
Here you changed Paul Schoeffler's activity from 1989 to 1981, yet looking at IMDb, I see his first credit in 1989. Your change, which you made with no explained rationale, is indistinguishable from vandalism. What is your rationale for this change?
Here you added interpretive content. It's not your job to decide that two things are similar. Let scholars make those comparisons. This edit constitutes what Wikipedia calls "original research". Our personal opinions do not belong in articles.
Here you rearrange a filmography with no obvious reason for doing so. What was your rationale for this?

I'd appreciate if you'd please respond below, as I'm contemplating whether or not your editing privileges should be interrupted. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:49, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Recent edit to Tony Pope

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Asdklf; (talk) 03:55, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.