User talk:76.212.0.242

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.212.0.242 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not this "NAadapriya banned user" that my block information says I am...I'm not a vandal, in fact my only edit under this IP was undoing vandalism...

Decline reason:

Per comment below. -- Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Special:Contributions/76.212.0.242|76.212.0.242]] (talk) 15:40, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Rangeblock

You are caught in a rangeblock, because the IP which you have just started editing from is within the range used by a banned and blocked user. Unfortunately you do not have an editing history on this IP before this week, so there is no easy way of being certain that you are an uninvolved editor. If you have an account name then I suggest you appeal through that. Or you can e-mail Yellow Monkey, the blocking admin. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 17:37, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

WP:AN/I has discussed User:Zaferk. I believe the consensus was that no-one cares. --Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 03:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Belgium has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Minimac94 (talk) 08:21, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Belgium. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Minimac94 (talk) 08:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Larry Sanger may be offensive or unwelcome. In general it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Nutiketaiel (talk) 13:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Larry Sanger may be offensive or unwelcome. In general it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Nutiketaiel (talk) 13:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look, would you stop adding that damn template to Sanger's user page? If he wanted it there, he would have added it himself. It's rude and inconsiderate to add something to another user's userpage without their permission. Nutiketaiel (talk) 13:19, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Larry Sanger user page template

Yes, I will stop now. All I ever wanted was a real response from someone. I'm so alone...I have no friends. :( 76.212.0.242 (talk) 13:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, vandalism isn't the way to get a positive response. Wikipedia has a vibrant and thriving community of editors; why don't you join it? Make an account. Start constructively editing articles. If you want to work with and communicate with other users, discuss improvements to articles on talk pages or join a Wikiproject on a topic that interests you and work with them. If you want friends and positive interaction on Wikipedia, then work to improve Wikipedia. Become a part of the community. Nutiketaiel (talk) 13:27, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.