Jump to content

User talk:76.117.247.55/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7

{| class="messagebox small-talk"

| class="plainlinks" | Click here to force update / purge / reload this talk page |}

This IP address resolved to c-68-39-174-238.hsd1.nj.comcast.net as of 23 January 2007, 14:03 (UTC)

And the point of that is?

And the point of that is? 68.39.174.238 02:50, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
That people keep wondering which ISP allows IPs to remain static for years? Flyingtoaster1337 08:28, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Comcaſt gives some degree of statisticity[sic] by mapping IPs to MAC addrs. Hence, by keeping the same MAC addr facing their DHCP svrs, I've been steadily assigned this IP addr for about 2 years. Prior to that I'd had some different routers with different IPs. Some of my contributions can be seen to articels like New City Village (Which are totall newbies). 68.39.174.238 22:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
I see nothing wrong with removing this box. The user that added it used an edit summary of ":P", and it is redundant to the whois links on the bottom. Regards, Tuxide 04:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
It's not annoying, it just didn't immediately make sense. 68.39.174.238 07:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)


Joke Templates

68.39.174.238

Vandalism Fighter
Real Name: Unknown.
Position: Persistent.
Edits: Well over 15000.
Wants a user page: NO.
Asked to register: Many, many times.
Asked to admin: Many, many times.
Is a vandal: No
Location: New Jersey
First known edit: 26 September 2005
2005 Archives: 1 · 2
2006 Archives: 1 · 2
2007 Archives: 1 · 2
The template-message(s) below contain(s) material found amusing and is/are kept for that reason.
They are NOT intended, nor should they be used, for any research or serious use.

Your neighbors have been blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating policy against letting off fireworks and munitions in celebration of the Gregorian New Year against the peace of this State, the government and dignity of the same. To contest this block, please move to another State and let them deal with you or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.

Note to sysops: Shooting off fireworks where it's illegal should almost never be done. If you disagree, contact your system's administrators.
Note: In the event of persistent disregard for the law, like your neighbors displayed this year, AGAIN, the local authorities should do something, but are almost certain to not do so, unless their fireworks do something like start a fire.
This is your final warning. If your neighbors continue to shoot off fireworks next door, feloniously discharge weapons up or at things, including trashcans or rusting cars, or continue to engange in any other noxious effontery, as they did to attempt to "celebrate" the New Year, you will be exiled from New Jersey indefinitely.

To see old comments, please see "my" archives (1, 2, 3) ([Foul language]... obnoxious removal of old text... One of these days I'll revert them ALL!)

Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but you may wish to create a account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, including:

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign and date your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Hello, can you help me by cleaning up the Graphic LAb/Research and developmt page ? The work to do, slowly, is to hide useless and out of topic sentences , like this edit. Hide + summarize 2 paragraphes a day may be already great. 210.203.61.15 (talk) 14:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Barnstar of Good Humor
For always being positive and being willing to take jokes. --Nlu (talk) 06:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for this. :-P miranda 02:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

Your recent edit to Jacksonville, Florida (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 06:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

ENOUGH with you and your re-addition of linkfarms! I've reverted you for that. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 07:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Czech language (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 23:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

O [...] you. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 23:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

I put in a successful request to get your edits whitelisted by the bot, so hopefully you won't have to deal with this anymore. east.718 at 06:53, January 4, 2008

Grr is right. I'm going to speak to VoA again and see if I can get this fixed. east.718 at 11:18, January 8, 2008

Your recent edit to Otaku (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 05:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

HaH, I reverted you. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 05:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Reform mathematics (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 11:45, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Reform mathematics (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 11:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Reform mathematics (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 11:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Yoruba religion (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Chernobyl disaster (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 23:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

...for being the only person working on WP:LINKHATE. I'd tell you to register and run for adminship, but I'm sure you've heard it a million times already and want to keep doing things your way. east.718 at 07:21, January 3, 2008

It's kind of an inside joke. A shortcut was needed to keep the topic in the admins' IRC channel from becoming too long, so I made a play off a very controversial guideline, WP:LINKLOVE. Please continue to keep up the high-quality contributions! east.718 at 09:06, January 3, 2008

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nuclear program of Iran, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nuclear program of Iran was changed by 68.39.174.238 (c) (t) deleting 8180 characters on 2008-01-07T19:33:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Not vandalism, reverted. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 19:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Um, not sure how else to get in touch with you. You sent me a message about not editing a section, something with vandalism. Thing is, I haven't edited any entries in wikipedia. I'm guessing it's a program error. Sorry, just wanted to give you a heads up. (Feel free to delete this off your page once you read it.) Take care and thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.145.123.126 (talk) 04:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Get an account!

Just kidding, don't. Then you'd become normal. Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 05:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

English is the universal language

Yug seemed to forget that we should be trying to establish communication with the German Lab as well. I think we need to get going and make setting standards a worldwide effort. The English lab should try to take on a dominant role is setting these standards, as it's destined to become the big dog in the room. We might make a point that English should be used for setting the standards, as it's the most universal of the three languages. i. e. higher percentage of the french and germans speak english than of the anglophones speak the other languages. I don't really know about the technical standards to make any contribution there, but we've probably already got as many or more technical people as the French. Sagredo⊙☿♀♁♂♃♄ 19:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Why not get account?

I admit that I am impressed that you have not created an account. I think that you are actually the only person on Wikipedia who edits without logging in, so you are definitely being creative. But, I have to ask: Does it make you feel tough?--Givelegal22 (talk) 20:12, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

No, it's quite nice, actually. Look: you're tearing everyone apart! I stayed up all last night thinking about it. Ask yourself: What would Hitler do if he were in your shoes? ;)--Givelegal22 (talk) 12:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
I've added it to the list already in RfCU. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 18:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey 68: Why haven't you responded to my question?--Givelegal22 (talk) 04:51, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Givelegal22 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

The above pupet of this notorious offender has been blocked indefinitely. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 21:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Images

I wish you would get an account! Do you think I am the sort of editor who would upload a truckload of images if I didn't have permission to use them? I have forwarded my email to the permission branch of wikipedia -its up to them to sort out the OTRS ticketing now ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ Talk? 21:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

And yes thats exactly why I didn't upload them to the commons because people there are in the frame of mind of delete first ask questions later ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ Talk? 21:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your message on my talk page regarding your OTRS query. I've search through the system a number of different ways and been unable to find a ticket relevant. However, it is of course important to note that just because I wasn't able to find the permission, it doesn't mean it isn't there. I'll ask the uploader for some more details to allow me to track down the email and I'll let you know what progress is made on this issue. Regards. Adambro (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

You don't need to register

Hello, 76.117.247.55 ... the IP for my DSL account changes every few weeks, but that hasn't stopped me ... just a friendly "Attaboy!" from a fellow anon-IP editor. :-) —72.75.72.63 (talk · contribs) 12:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

When I first came to Wikipedia, I had the same attitude. The only two reasons I registered were A: The ability to create articles and B: The desire to at some point become an admin. :) GO-PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 21:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

your edits for today

have attracted the attention of VoaBot. Not sure what happened there, but you look like a real editor and not a vandal. . . . Dlohcierekim 17:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

You're on the whitelist for VoABot II (actually the bot allies list o.O) but it's still reverting you for some reason. I suggest instead of deleting linkfarms outright, just comment them out and leave an explanatory note in the edit summary. Best, east.718 at 21:38, January 17, 2008

'238 Userbox MfD

User:Solumeiras has nominated a number of subpages (userspace userboxes, actually) in your user talkspace for deletion:

I thought it'd be polite to inform the person whose pages were being deleted. Have a great day, 68.39.174.238! :) ~Kylu (u|t) 21:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Surprisingly, three of these were created by-- Kylu! LOL. Dlohcierekim 21:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Sure were, and I still think '238 should be treated with a bit more respect, considering how much work he puts into Wikipedia. That's why I made them to begin with. ~Kylu (u|t) 21:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

I used TWINKLE when nominating these, and it notified Kylu not you, 68.39.*. The debate should be closed as I was not thinking straight when I nominated it - I was vandal-fighting and doing a fair bit of vandal-reversion yesterday. Apologies to 68.39.174.238 and Kylu for this nomination, it wasn't a bad-faith nomination, I just wasn't thinking straight. Sorry for the harm and upset I caused. --Solumeiras talk 10:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar, much appreciated!

BTW, your "fireworks" message is LOL at work funny! --Slashme (talk) 06:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

(in reply to question) You know the "your neighbours have been letting of fireworks so you have been blocked" thing. --Slashme (talk) 06:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

And so was your edit to my error message! It's staying like that for sure! --Slashme (talk) 06:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

This Section will be to delete when read

because it's this one to read :

LOL...

You are keeping the people at the Graphics Lab busy! :-P See you around. Miranda 20:05, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Parliament.py

File:TestSenate.svg
Settings: Title: US Senate 2008 List: Republicans, 49,#DD4444; Democrats, 51,#4444DD (also works without the colours) Height: 5
Settings: Title: US Senate 2008 List: Republicans, 49,#DD4444; Democrats, 51,#4444DD (also works without the colours) Height: 10

Hi, please try again, I think it's working OK now. --Slashme (talk) 06:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I see my diagrams make a nice demonstration of that optical illusion where the spots appear between the corners of the squares except in the focus of your view ;-) --Slashme (talk) 06:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Hermann grid illusion ~Kylu (u|t) 22:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Why not get account?

So, when do plan on getting an account? Also, what name will you choose for it? You could name it My_IP_Address_is_68.39.174.238. That way, you'd get the best of both worlds. And I'd finally be able to put this chapter of my life behind me.--Givelegal22 (talk) 10:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Parliament.py

In reply to:

Does the fact that it now fails to return anything count, or is that because of the "bug fixing in progress" ? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 18:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

It works for me (tested when I reported the bug fixed and three minutes ago). When you say "fails to return anything", do you get a completely blank screen, or an error message of some kind? Seeing as the script is server-side, reloading without cache shouldn't help, but maybe there's something about the form that's changed, so give it a shot. --Slashme (talk) 05:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Your answers are requested there (subject : archiving and summarization of all the talk/test/draft pages about the Slashme's script and Legislative standard).
09:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Reverse of the US Great Seal




















Booyah! -- I. Pankonin Review me! 09:19, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Guess who?

    ____       _                __  _                                        __
   / __ \_____(_)___ ___  ___  / /_(_)___ ___  ___    _      ______ ______  / /_  ___  ________
  / /_/ / ___/ / __ `__ \/ _ \/ __/ / __ `__ \/ _ \  | | /| / / __ `/ ___/ / __ \/ _ \/ ___/ _ \
 / ____/ /  / / / / / / /  __/ /_/ / / / / / /  __/  | |/ |/ / /_/ (__  ) / / / /  __/ /  /  __/
/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/ /_/\___/\__/_/_/ /_/ /_/\___/   |__/|__/\__,_/____/ /_/ /_/\___/_/   \___/
Actually it was "РЯ1МЕТ1МЕ", a notorious impoſtor. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 17:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

black stump

you have added a link to Beyond the pale on the Black stump page. This leads to a redirection page, and I'm not sure which of the options you were thinking of when you said it was a similar idea. Could you specify which one, please, so the link can go straight there? WotherspoonSmith (talk) 03:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks For The Flag!

Thanks for adding the proper flag to our Battle of the Little Bighorn article. I had removed an anachronistic reginmental flag from the 1920s and tried to upload and post a guidon image; another editor had kindly supplied a better and more legal image, and I appreciate the fact that you placed it properly on the page. I still have a lot to learn about how to do stuff like that. Funny thinh is - I've done it correctly in other pages but forgot how to. Thanks! Sensei48 (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Indonesian COA

The first image, the one from vector images.com is obviously a derivation of the gov't COA. At some point derivations can become different enough to allow their own copyright. I don't know how that is defined. Quite probably it depends on how good a lawyer you hire. We should avoid redrawing (in vector) close copies of images from VI as there is a possibility that the image has been changed sufficiently to qualify for its own copyright. Which would be a Russian copyright, because VI is, as you know, in Russia. There's another real world factor. It would take a hell of a lot of rubles to hire a decent attorney in the U. S. or U. K. or wherever they would have to sue Wiki. My thought is to quietly move away from using their images. I put this on your talk page, as I don't want educate certain deletionist parties who frequent the graphics lab, please consider deleting it. (It's late, I'm tired, so this probably makes no sense, anyway.) Sagredo⊙☿♀♁♂♃♄ 20:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I meant deleting these comments. I don't know how fast we can do them. The scouting people were kind enough to put a barnstar on my user page, just as they emailed me a list of about 30 logos. The real world is likely to start demanding more of my time, as well. On the VI images, we need to find (google) government (or whatever) images to be sure we're not redrawing something like the wings of the Indonesian eagle. The first part of the project should be to replace the VI rasters with ones from safe sources, concentrating as you say national and state emblems first. an Image google for the motto also worked well.

We could do without the time wasting copyright debate on the graphics page, too. It think User:Sagredo/copyrights and trademarks is ready to be looked over by one or more of Category:Wikipedian intellectual property lawyers, and then should be moved to the graphics lab. Sagredo⊙☿♀♁♂♃♄ 21:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Graphics Lab

Sorry, thought I had seeing as I did the other requests... Mangwanani (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Please notice the new request in the section User_talk:68.39.174.238#Parliament.py 210.203.61.15 (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Bad guys and good guys who're still around

Hey! It's been a long time since we bumped into each other. I'm surprised you're still around - even a lot of admins have burnt out and left. :)

But there's bad guys still around too - User:Guywithdress and his socks mean everyone's favourite copyvio writer is still alive and kicking. :( Pegasus «C¦T» 02:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

User:Logged in 22

Okay, so what's the point of this edit? I'm not seeing the connection here. --Calton | Talk 02:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I undid your change, since the "Suspected sockpuppets of Guywithdress" category is already sub-categorised under Primetime. Apparently no one saw the connection, but I'm amazed the person who re-deleted Dthat didn't. Pegasus «C¦T» 03:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your userpage, basically I didn't see the subcategorization, so it wasn't a very useful edit. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 19:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
BTW... do you want that cool new create-protection thing enabled for your user page? :) (Deliberately trying to save you from more scrolling by not putting this in a new topic. :P) Pegasus «C¦T» 00:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Autovon

I made a small link in the Autovon article - but there appears to be so many bells around that I am not really sure which one to ring link to. Can you correct the link if it's going to the wrong page? Thanks!

(I know this probably is ideally more appropriate for article's talk page, blah blah, but this one should be a quickie for you. :) ) Pegasus «C¦T» 07:16, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

What the hell?

Create an account, please! You can be the best edian ever! Basketball110 what famous people say 00:47, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The Editor's Barnstar
This is a barnstar for being the best editor ever on Wikipedia. This barnstar is like a minister: no this barnstar can accept gifts over 50$. The point is that it is persuasive. This barnstar is upset that it's receiver doesn't create an account. Basketball110 what famous people say 03:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Edian is short for Wikipedian. User:Maximillion Pegasus brought up a point that I hadn't thought of: your edits won't be transfered from IP to user, if you decide to become an edian. But then again, you'd have about 116 co-nominators for administor. Cheers, Basketball110 what famous people say 04:15, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

User page

I noticed you do not have a user page, would you like one? Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Nuuuuu! We just deleted his userpage, don't recreate it... lol. He's said no before, anyway, and the page has been deleted somewhere around 15 times. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 08:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Oh, I see that. Sorry. Cheers. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 18:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Hypothesis

I have a hypothesis that this IP address does not belong to one person, but has changed hands a multitude of times over the years. Miraculously, it has always gone to someone who has decided to make lots of great edits before moving on to another great edtor, and another, and another. I propose to call this the "68.39.174.238 alternating users hypothesis". There could be a user box and everything. Okiefromokla questions? 19:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

As far as I know, ever edit made from here as been mine. Granted, someone else could've edited for a time and I wouldn't've known it if they didn't do something really noteworthy that later came back to me. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 20:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
If that's correct, then how do you keep the same IP address? The Comcast article says that all Comcast IPs are dynamic. Do you work for the cable company? GO-PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 21:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Userboxes

Hi there, I created a bunch of userboxes to describe the editing style of no account IP's for a friend of mine 156.34.142.110, and he liked them and reccomended that I show them to you so if you wanted to you could add them to your user talk page :).Cheers,--Mifter (talk) 23:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


Code Result
|{{User:Mifter/Userboxes/IP Edits}}
IPThis user thinks that accounts are overrated and would much rather edit from an IP address. ±
 Usage
|{{User:Mifter/Userboxes/Ip contrib}}
This user likes to remain an anonymous contributor and thus edits only from IP address and does not use an account. ±
 Usage
|{{User:Mifter/Userboxes/Here to edit}}
No AccountThis user is here to edit and has no lofty goals beyond that and thus does not use an account to edit. ±
 Usage

--Mifter (talk) 23:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Question

Are you just vandalizing to not be requested to get an account?--67.87.67.175 (talk) 16:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

nominated for adminship

G'day. I would like you to consider Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/68.39.174.238 seriously. As I have noted there, I suggest that you create an account that would take the sysop flag once appointed, and you could continue to edit from an IP address whenever it suits you. You would then be able to do sysop actions when appropriate, reducing the double handling. This is not without precedent, as I have successfully nominated another good contributor who had continued to edit from an IP address until I thought his contributions were of sufficient quality that he would be an asset to the admin team. John Vandenberg (talk) 03:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Anon IP

[For anyone who doesn't follow that link: This is an old in-joke, not homophobia]

Are you the only anonymous IP who doesn't have any gay friends? —BradV 03:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

euh... I don't know if that will help you quest BradV, but I can garanty that I don't have any [know] gay friend currently. So we have one IP at least. For IP68, I can't say. 220.135.4.212 (talk) 13:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

sixty height dot thirty nine dot one hundred seventy four dot two hundred thirty eight : we have to talk.

Hello, I think we (two different IP) are confusing other users of the Graphic Lab. I propose that we call you "68". For me it's a bit more complex, but we can try to call me "220" for the moment. (I have a stable IP, the only trouble is that I use mine, my university's computers, my girl friend computer, and that I change of appartement every 3 months. (my life is quite complex currently).)

If we start the use, other will follow (I hope). 220.135.4.212 (talk) 13:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

2 messages in one

Hello 68, Please, can you first remember yourself what you think about the Greenspun project.

Then, please corect this sentences mistakes [edit this section]. Regards

220.135.4.212 (talk) 15:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Ok for your last notice. I found that it was the only alternative, since I can't send you emails. Sorry. 220.135.4.212 (talk) 18:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

You rock

Yea yea, I know, I can't make you an account, cajole you into making one, force you into the Steward's chair, yadda yadda yadda. Just wanted to let you know I thinks its cool for an IP to have 22,000 edits, you and Bipolar-anonIP give IP editors a good name. Now if we could just re-enable page creation for you guys. MBisanz talk 08:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Coat of Arms of Iceland

Ok, I'm trying to figure out what you're saying and am at a complete loss. Are the images okay or do they need redone? I'll watch this page for your reply. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 19:45, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I'll overwrite the old flag file. Is the seal okay as well, if part of it needs fixed lemme know! §hep • ¡Talk to me! 22:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

P.S. The dot doesn't blink, just let's people know when I'm not on, so as not to expect a quick response.

April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Microsoft Private Folder has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Creamy!Talk 02:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

False Positive!

Sorry! False positive! GET A USERNAME! --Creamy!Talk 02:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Reverted "confusing" and "wikify" on Intelligence Community A-Space

Unfortunately, when an article-wide tag is attached with no explanation on the talk page, little progress can be made on reducing grounds for complaint if they are not obvious to other editors. In this case, for example, it is not clear how the article is deficient in wikilinking. I see quite a few wikilinks. Also, the article does not depend on external links; all its references are appropriate and in inline form.

How is the article confusing? Is there, for example, use of unfamiliar intelligence terminology that has not been wikilinked? Again, this can't be fixed if there's no information on the source of the confusion. Looking at the text, I might argue that the reference to GAMMA should be in parentheses rather than brackets, or even as a footnote, but it would surprise me if that's the chief problem.

While these questions are specific to this article, I would urge editors placing article-wide tags to make a regular practice of putting specific critiques on the article talk page.

Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 13:41, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Get an Account!!!!!!

Get A Account!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by ShakespearesZombie (talk • contribs) 07:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Sign Your Posts!!!!!!!!!! :D IceUnshattered [ t ] 21:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
LOL!!!!!!!!!! 68.39.174.238 (talk) 23:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

IP Expiring Soon?

Hey there, 68.39.174.238. I was reading the top of your talk page just now and noted that it's been almost two years since you said that Comcast has assigned this IP address to you. I'm curious, but will it be expiring next January? -- Altiris Helios Exeunt 07:24, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Archiving?

Hi 68, any particular reason why my archiving of your overly long talk page was unwelcome? --  Netsnipe  ►  14:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Idea for not having a userpage

If you don't want an account, fine. But at least redirect your userpage to your talk page.-- Freshbakedpie (Wanna talk?) \'_'/ 18:02, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

For as long as I've known 68, he's refused to have a user page or redirect because it reinforces the point that as long as we still have anonymous editors on this site, we need to assume good faith and not prejudge an edit based on whether a user page link is either red or blue. --  Netsnipe  ►  16:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
I do not think that I've ever stated that as a reason, however it's redundant now, given the signature default change. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 20:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

RE:Your bott blew it...

Thanks for the notice. I'd thought I'd tested it with subsections, but apparently not. Of course, as always, this waited to manifest itself until I was on vacation. I can't really fix it now (luckily someone reformatted that section to get rid of the subheadings) but I will most definitely do so when I get back in a week or so.--Dycedarg ж 18:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Fixed.--Dycedarg ж 23:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello! I've noticed that you have edited Wikipedia without logging in to an account. It's great that you've been contributing; however, I urge you to create an account. Here is a list of the benefits of having an account:

There are no cons to signing up for an account. In fact, you can find even more pros at the "why create an account" page! Signing up is completely free and you don't need to enter any personal information! Plus you can have a user page, which you can use to show your interests, style, or nearly whatever! So, unless you can think of a con, please sign up for an account right now! RC-0722 247.5/1 23:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, surprize surprize! 68.39.174.238 (talk) 00:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
You know, if you got an account, there might be a way to move your contribs from this one to that one. RC-0722 247.5/1 00:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
And? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 00:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Note: That would require a database query, and I doubt you could convince the devs of the necessity of such an action.--Dycedarg ж 21:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Well, that's when we use my über hacking skills, cuz there the best I've ever seen. RC-0722 361.0/1 03:46, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Smile!

-Pilotguy contact tower has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

:P -Pilotguy contact tower 20:18, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Graphics lab

Hello, 76.117.247.55. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--pbroks13talk? 14:54, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:Hindu-German Conspiracy

Wow!!!, that was an awesome source, and it's probably gonna take me a month or two to fill out the three articles it's relevant to. Cant thankyou enough for that. How did you even know about the book??? Cheers again. rueben_lys (talk · contribs) 03:32, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Samba TNG AfD

Thought I'd make sure that you were aware of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samba TNG, as you had PRODed the article. Feel free to comment. --Karnesky (talk) 20:04, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

To make things easier for you

-- -- Suntag ☼ 13:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Graphic_Lab/shortcut

Is this the page you meant? I've made the nomination for you. Please add a rationale on the subpage. Need anything else, go ahead and ask. --UsaSatsui (talk) 18:15, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/shortcut

Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/shortcut, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/shortcut and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/shortcut during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Suntag ☼ 15:16, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Unsuccessful RfA

Please register to become an admin. Then I can make an RfA for you. --░▒▓Frogger3140▓▒░ (talk) 13:29, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

You can change [[Image:Octagon-warning.png]] to the latest block image, [[Image:Stop_x_nuvola.svg]] --░▒▓Frogger3140▓▒░ (talk) 13:29, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
By the way, that RfA ended a long time ago. Neptune5000 (talk) 03:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

In honor of anon editing...

Who needs accounts anyway? You're making an important point: people are twice as likely to mistake an anon's constructive edits for vandalism. 67.233.7.159 (talk) 22:05, 5 October 2008 (UTC) AKA GO-PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 22:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Graphic_Lab/Image_workshop#Flatten_paper

I've replied to your request. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 18:19, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

space Mutiny Poster

there was a comment within the page source that the intent was to swap out the images periodically. But because it was a non-free image it got deleted during its dormancy. If you have it, upload it, and add it like a gallery tot he bottom of the page. --K3vin (talk) 04:41, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:76.117.247.55/Archive_7&oldid=1247064047"