Jump to content

User talk:74.129.221.41

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


August 2016

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Calzone has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Calzone was changed by 74.129.221.41 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907576 on 2016-08-03T22:58:18+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sandra Fluke have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:47, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Autism Speaks, you may be blocked from editing. Incidentally, you might want to look up the word "ostensibly". It doesn't mean what you seem to think it means. SummerPhDv2.0 15:47, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Regarding your message to CAPTAIN RAJU here:
  • This is a controversial claim about a living person, in violation of WP:BLP.
  • This is another WP:BLP problem.
  • This is your opinion.
  • This is an off-topic link to another subject you feel is tangentially related.
  • This, this, this, this and this are either vandalism or you not knowing what the word you were using means.
  • This, this, this and this were apparently productive.
  • This is your opinion.
  • This, this and this are vandalism.
  • This is either vandalism or a failure to understand common folk tales.
I count four likely productive edits and 14 edits that someone else had to clean up. Your signal-to-noise ratio is quite low. If you intended to be productive by making potentially libelous claims about living people, please read and carefully consider our policy on contentious claims about living people. - SummerPhDv2.0 17:36, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am not CAPTAIN RAJU
To clarify, I am copying your statement from their talk page.

First of all, thank you for including my positive editions of information to wikipedia. I will agree posts concerning Leroy Brown and Oscar the Grouch were probably less than useful. However, my comment to Life, is correct. There is no other way ANYONE could see the game. You have literally zero control over the game after that point, unless you deliberately rig the spinner. Also, Bob Craggit is supposedly--or ostensibly--overworked and underpaid. Dickens provides no evidence for either claim. In the midst of the industrial revolution, I'm sure a talented book-keeper (thus not Craggit) would have been able to find better employment, if not, he is not underpaid.

Regarding Autism Speaks, what she said fits Wikipedia's own definition of hate speech. Autism Speaks routinely portrays persons on the Autism Spectrum in a negative light, I do not see how either of these additions were inaccurate. Murderous might be a strong word, but drowining a child is an act of murder in every legal jurisdiction and the desire to do so is a murderous desire.

Your addition re Life is original research which is specifically not allowed on Wikipedia. It is not allowed because it is often incorrect. (After choosing to go to college or not, players have several options during the game: Betting on "Spin to Win", when to use "Share the Wealth" cards, choosing which direction to go at several forks, etc.)
No, the character is not "ostensibly" overworked (which implies doubt) any more than Tiny Tim is ostensibly crippled or Scrooge is ostensibly miserly. Your understanding of employment prospects in Dickensian England, your guesses as to Cratchit's skills, etc. are all inappropriate WP:OR. If you cannot ascertain what material an author intends to present as factual verses ostensible it would be wise to not edit plot summaries.
Do not combine material from multiple sources to say something that neither source directly states. This is WP:SYN. Do not apply criminal or other derogatory labels to individuals, whether you believe it to be true or not. This is a direct violation of our strict policy on contentious statements about living people.
It is becoming clear that you are either trolling or simply not competent to edit. This conversation is over. - SummerPhDv2.0 18:31, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Giving Tree has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Mtpaley. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Josh Day— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mtpaley (talk) 00:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:74.129.221.41&oldid=1075891507"