User talk:72.87.117.10

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Arkansas, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Arkansas was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957353 on 2010-12-14T16:42:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:42, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

March 2011

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Solar chemical. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want. Metiscus (talk) 20:04, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Daylighting has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. JDCMAN (talk) 19:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nitrogen group, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator ^talk 15:15, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cuban Revolution, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cuban Revolution was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.936653 on 2012-02-27T14:15:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cuban Revolution. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Vrenator ^talk 16:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rikki-Tikki-Tavi, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rikki-Tikki-Tavi was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964398 on 2012-04-10T18:09:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:09, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Main sequence was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910084 on 2012-09-20T18:14:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stew was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.980101 on 2012-11-28T15:30:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eric Garrett. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Eric Garrett was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86531 on 2012-11-28T15:36:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mary (mother of Jesus), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Mary (mother of Jesus) was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.91048 on 2012-11-28T15:39:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:39, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eric Garrett, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Wywin (talk|contribs) 15:46, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Star Wars sequel trilogy was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86 on 2012-12-06T15:41:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:42, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

March 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Religion in Mesopotamia was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.983787 on 2013-03-06T19:19:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:19, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Mesopotamia with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Widr (talk) 19:20, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Religion in Mesopotamia with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Widr (talk) 19:25, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Cation-exchange capacity has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cation-exchange capacity was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851429 on 2013-05-07T14:23:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Khalid Sasseh.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm Gaia Octavia Agrippa. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to OP, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 16:59, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hitler family with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 19:50, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 3 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of high schools in Rhode Island page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to OP has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: OP was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853423 on 2014-12-04T18:09:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:09, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at OP with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Winner 42 Talk to me! 15:42, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nitrogen cycle has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nitrogen cycle was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904584 on 2015-12-02T15:34:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

October 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Turkey, you may be blocked from editing. Timothy Robinson12345 (talk) 12:52, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

A kitten for you!

HI

Timothy Robinson12345 (talk) 13:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Redtmr, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Timothy Robinson12345 (talk) 13:30, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

A sock puppet is someone who uses multiple accounts to contribute in a disruptive way, mainly to make it appear like there are many different people contributing. It's also a term used for users who have been banned, then created new accounts to circumvent that block. Please read the notice carefully, and follow the links in it to make yourself familiar with the allegations, and defend against the claims if you wish. —Hexafluoride ^{Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk} 21:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Knarr, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 15:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

72.87.117.10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think I was unfairly blocked I was warned one time. 72.87.117.10 (talk) 17:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

A history of vandalism going back six years. Many, many warnings. And you've provided absolutely no reason to believe the vandalism will permanently stop. The block is appropriate. Yamla (talk) 17:10, 8 December 2016

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

72.87.117.10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have learned my lesson im very sorry 72.87.117.10 (talk) 14:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That's not quite enough to warrant an unblock. As stated earlier, there's a history of vandalism going back at least six years. Yes you're sorry, but that's not enough. If you do want to contribute productively, wait for a few months, come back, explain what you'd like to work on and maybe this will be reconsidered. As for now, this is declined RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I agree

You have not shown any improvement over the last few months. I would wait to send another unblock request or you might not be able to edit your talk page. --Lt Timothy Robinson (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wham!— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Rugrats, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at WONY.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Cocohead781 (talk) 16:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Super Mario Bros. 2— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 17:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

September 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harry Baals. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SunilNevlaFan✨ 18:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

February 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse, you may be blocked from editing. David Biddulph (talk) 18:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---