User talk:71.41.210.146/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions with 71.41.210.146. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

< Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4 >

All Pages:

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - ... (up to 100)

"proper minus sign" at WWVB

Unfortunately if someone now does a text search on the page for "-17", they won't find it. Jeh (talk) 10:13, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's a bit of a pain. Using a hyphen sure looks a lot worse. Hopefully, browsers will start considering the variants different "cases" and so will match if case-insensitive matching is desired. I don't know a perfect solution. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 23:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The time code format table WWVB

One thought I had was to add a fourth column, "value of bit from example diagram." Put an M in those cells for the markers. One thing that has stopped me from doing that is that I can't think of a concise column heading. Is it ok to use an asterisk and explain it in a footnote to the table? Jeh (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I used "Ex" as a column header, which I think is good enough. Done. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 23:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely so, with the added text in the "meaning" column. Better than I'd envisioned! Thanks! Jeh (talk) 01:48, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So based on your example I did the analagous thing at WWV (radio station). Would not have tackled the table munging without seeing what you'd done. Thanks again. Jeh (talk) 04:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicted licensing on image File:ApolloLunarEscapeSystemExample.jpg

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Er, why can't it be both free and non-free? As the Template:PD-Pre1978 says, it's in the public domain in the United States. It might be non-free in other jurisdictions; I'm not certain enough to remove the other notice. (If you are, feel free.) 71.41.210.146 (talk) 06:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If it has ANY non-free component that it cannot be tagged as PD, but if you can prove it was first published in the US prior to 1978 then only the PD-Pre 1978 is applicable...

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:34, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Easily enough done, as the image description links to the original source as a scanned PDF, which is dated June 1970 and does not bear a copyright notice. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 12:59, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New tables at WWV

Great work, again! Jeh (talk) 05:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changes and requested change

First, let me say how happy I am that someone is using it.

With that out of the way, I made it so long ago that I'm not quite sure why I put the trailing brs, I think it was something to do with a spacing problem. That aside, as said, it's been awhile since I've made it, but I'm fairly certain you should be able to specify a custom color. I'll check the code after this message to check.— Dæ dαlus^Contribs 23:14, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The parameters you want should be fontcolor1 and fontcolor2, as well as background2 for the blue part of the bar being something other than blue. As to the computed percentage, I'll get to work on that.— Dæ dαlus^Contribs 23:37, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done.— Dæ dαlus^Contribs 06:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Account?

Presumably the current user of this IP has seen {{welcome-anon}} already. Thanks for your contributions. -Atmoz (talk) 16:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FFU

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for Upload! The file has been uploaded. You can find it at File:SpongeConstruction.svg. See Wikipedia:Images#Using images to learn image syntax, or Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files for other types of files. Regards, Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 02:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating File:SpongeConstruction.svg, but it looks like the original CC-by-3.0 license got changed to by-sa, and the (um, legally required) attribution to the original authors got lost. I'd do it myself, but I'm not sure if you intend to claim any interest in the converted file. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 08:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with WP:BB, I went ahead and made the changes to commons:File:SpongeConstruction.svg. I hope I did it right; I'm not really familiar with the Commons' annotation standards and standard templates. If I was too aggressive in removing your credit or something else, please fix or revert as you see fit. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 09:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of earthquakes

Hi, thanks for taking the discussion on this to the talk page. Would you consider removing or rewording the "This list is heavily biased to recent years or due to the development and widespread deployment of seismometers. Large earthquakes were not less common in the past, just records detailed enough to make magnitude estimates." text from the main page until this is resolved, since it reads like a personal viewpoint? (At least the second sentence, and perhaps change "This list is" to "This list may be".) I agree your statement is correct, just not worded well. The article is likely being heavily hit at the moment due to links from the Japanese earthquake article, so it's important it look good, thus me contacting you instead of letting this work itself out more leisurely. –flodded ☃ (gripe) 16:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else found a reference, so I edited it lightly enough to not break WP:3RR... I think it's mostly fine now, though still reads slightly biased but that could just be me. –flodded ☃ (gripe) 17:46, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 71.41.210.146. You have new messages at User talk:Sitush/Archive_1.
Message added 21:07, 22 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

End of validity of IDEA patent

In International_Data_Encryption_Algorithm 71.41.210.146/you wrote, circa May 19, 2009 about U.S. Patent 5,214,703, issued May 25, 1993, that is has an expiry date of January 7, 2012.

That date was later justified by another user with this reasoning:

"Note that the PGP FAQ still claims the expiry date of the US patent to be May 25, 2010. However, US patent law was changed in 1995 such that patents now expire 20 years after filing, not 17 years after issuing. This holds retroactively for all patents that had not yet expired at the time the changed law came into effect, and it thus holds for IDEA."

Agreed, the stated change in patent law did occur and does applies retroactively to U.S. 5,214,703. But IMHO the patent still expires 17 years from issue date, that is after May 25, 2010 as claimed in the PGP FAQ.

The key point is that the protection under the new law, as defined by 35 U.S.C. 154(a)(2), lasts "20 years from the date on which the application for the patent was filed in the United States or, if the application contains a specific reference to an earlier filed application or applications under section 120, 121, or 365(c) of this title, from the date on which the earliest such application was filed.". The patent claims priority w.r.t. a Swiss patent filed May 18, 1990, and that is the start of the 20 years period, which thus ends May 18, 2010, that is slightly before the end of the 17 year period which ends May 25, 2010. The protection afforded to the licensee by the old law is NOT removed retroactively, and thus protection ends May 25, 2010.

I located the Swiss patent by checking under foreign priority in the status of the US patent 5214703 at <http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair>

I am open to contradiction, and more than willing to examine any reference to the January 7, 2012 date.

Fgrieu (talk) 16:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like you're right (you considered a detail I didn't), but you could explain the logic better: patents pending when the change was made (like this one) got the benefit of both rules, so the later of the two dates applies. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 19:46, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: which of the three named sections (120, 121, or 365(c)) do you think applies? I see how 365(a) applies, but I'm not sure about 365(c). Do you understand that bit about "designating"? 71.41.210.146 (talk) 20:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion at Talk:International Data Encryption Algorithm#Patent expiration date. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 20:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In my reading of 35 U.S.C. 154(a)(2), the applicable section would be 120 referencing 363: "An application for patent for an invention disclosed (..properly..) in an application previously filed (..) as provided by section 363 of this title (..reading:) An international application designating the United States shall have the effect, from its international filing date under article 11 of the treaty, of a national application for patent regularly filed in the Patent and Trademark Office except (..)". I am not at all sure about all this, but at one point was told (on another case) by a real patent lawyer that the "foreign priority" section is precisely here to record which foreign patents shall serve as reference for both the start and end of the protection period, that is 20 years from the moment the first patent on the subject was submitted. My reasoning depends heavilly on that. At any rate, if the Swiss patent does not suit, the WIPO/EPO patent could, and that would put the reference filing date on May 16th, 1991, and expiry on May 16th, 2011 together with the EP patent. As of "designating", I understand this as the statement to the patent office of what foreign patent the applicant ask shall serve to establish the start (and end) of the protection period, which is to be performed as required in section 120.Fgrieu (talk) 05:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

RBU (radio station), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Alpha Quadrant ^talk 22:40, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Files for upload

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for Upload! The file has been uploaded. You can find it at File:Opera LNGS timing.jpg. See Wikipedia:Images#Using images to learn image syntax, or Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files for other types of files. Regards, Armbrust ^{Talk to me about my edits}_review 02:10, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]