User talk:69.159.70.172

July 2024

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Karl Wallenda, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donald Albury 14:03, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please note that, per the policy at Wikipedia:Verifiability, All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable. Additionally, four types of information must be accompanied by an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material. The four types are:

• direct quotations,

...

You are required to provide a citation to a reliable source for a direct quotation immediately following the quotation. It does not matter if a source somewhere else in the article supports the quotation.

I also invite you to read the policy at Wikipedia:No personal attacks, and advise you to adhere to that policy. - Donald Albury 17:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Donald Albury -

SIR - YOUR TYPICAL WIKIPEDIA VERY POOR / NON RESPONSE IS NOT AT ALL APPRECIATED AND NOT AT ALL SMART FOR ANY OCTOGENARIAN TO ENTER ( MIGHT BE TIME TO RETIRE OR STEP DOWN WORKING FOR WIKIPEDIA )-

NO PERSONAL ATTACK(S) WAS / WERE ENTERED, JUST FACTS -

DO TRY TO SMARTEN UP JUST A LITTLE AS IT IS LATER THAN YOU THINK -

WHY NOT, RIGHT NOW, TAKE SOME TIME TO MAKE THE NECESSARY ADDITION YOURSELF IF THAT IS ALL WHICH IS KEEPING REMOVED ENTRY FROM BEING ADDED -

WE CANNOT FIND ANY REFERENCE BUT WHAT WAS ENTERED IS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN ABSOLUTELY CORRECT INFORMATION AS WE KNEW KARL WALLENDA WHILE WORKING WITH RBandB&B CIRCUS IN THE 1970s -

NONE OF YOU ADMIN TYPES EVER SEEM TO DO ANY LOOKING / SEARCHING / SEEKING OF DATA AT ALL ON YOUR OWN WHICH IS MORE THAN EXTEMELY HARD TO FIGURE OUT -

WITH THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE, WIKIPEDIA ARE ALWAYS THE ULTIMATE END LOSER IF SO MANY OF YOU NOT WITH IT TYPES ARE ALLOWED TO KEEP ON MAKING THESE TOTALLY ' ARBITRARY ' DIMBULB REVERTS / REMOVALS - THINK ABOUT -

MANY OTHERS FEEL EXACTLY SAME AND THAT IS WHY THEY DO NOT ENTER ANYTHING ANY LONGER NOR EVEN LOOK AT WIKIPEDIA VERY MUCH, IF AT ALL -

NO FURTHER WORD WILL BE ENTERED FROM THIS END SO NO NEED FOR ANY RESPONSE FROM YOUR END AS IT WILL BE UNWORTHY OF OUR TIME UNLESS YOU DO THE ONLY RIGHT THING AND FOLLOW THROUGH ON ABOVE SUGGESTION / IDEA TO ADD THE CORRECT / RIGHT / PROPER INFORMATION -

THANK YOU AND GOOD BYE - 69.159.70.172 - 69.159.70.172 (talk) 17:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC) -

Wow, quite something to see this all caps tirade and personal attack on Donald Albury, who at this point has created 324 articles on WP. Use of the royal we really sets it off, to comic effect. Expect to see this IP indefinitely blocked, richly deserved. Carlstak (talk) 00:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

---