User talk:69.126.88.42

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 69.126.88.42, is registered to Optimum and is believed to be a static address used by only one connection. However, this IP address may represent more than one user, accessing the Internet via several personal computers or devices.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

If vandalism is noted from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

March 2021

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Aryan. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Wham2001 (talk) 07:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I didn't attack other editors. You all did when you continued to dehumanize Indians whenever we tell you that there is no evidence for your racist, white supremacist beliefs about our people and culture. This man spent months sharing the same debunked news stories, some from even earlier years, to debunk factual information from Harvard University to claim David Reich's research said the opposite of what it did. Any time this racism is pointed out, you all call us "Hindutva" or whatever else to dehumanize any non-Whites who disagree with you about the facts about our own culture that you're trying to claim came from your ancestors without proof. You are all a bunch of racist, white supremacists and I will call you out on what you all are. In fact, look at your response just now: "The brown person is talking, time to silence them." as typical of you so-called "wiki editors" on here. Anything an Indian says is not allowed to be heard by White Supremacists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.126.88.42 (talk • contribs) 08:22, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not being silenced: if you would like to have a discussion about the source that you presented then you are welcome to post to the article talk page again, but without the personal attack. What you must do, however, is to treat other editors civilly and with respect, even if you don't agree with their edits and don't like their politics. Referring to other editors as white supremacists is unacceptable. Please read the Wikipedia policy on personal attacks, which you are obliged to follow if you wish to continue to edit here, and consider this as a final warning that, if you attack on other editors again, as you did at Talk:Aryan and in the paragraph above on this talk page, you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Wham2001 (talk) 11:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 11:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your edit confused Narasimhan et al. (2018)(pre-print; peer-reviewed Narasimhan et al. (2019)) with Shinde et al. (2019), more specificically Shinde's spin of his own results and publication, contradicting his peer-reviewed publication. See this thread. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:51, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Aryan. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I'm not the one who reverted your edits. If you want to contribute positively, please delete your talk page accusations and try your edit again (but without the promotional tone or the links to CVs). Firefangledfeathers (talk) 07:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Aryan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 (talk) 07:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Aryan. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. nagualdesign 08:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Ched (talk) 09:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.