Jump to content

User talk:65.51.177.162

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Mexica has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 15:31, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

== sdxdeevtyweb wert

December 2009

[edit]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Intel Core i7. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jovianeye (talk) 17:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Intel Core i7. Jovianeye (talk) 17:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. AlexiusHoratius 17:42, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Perm (hairstyle), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

March 2010

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lamb of God (band). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GunMetal Angel 17:01, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2010

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Forrest, you may be blocked from editing. Jevansen (talk) 09:22, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Croton-on-Hudson, New York, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Croton-on-Hudson, New York. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Reach Out to the Truth 16:29, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Scott Hairston, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Muboshgu (talk) 17:44, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Scott Hairston. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Logan Talk Contributions 17:50, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Scott Hairston. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Logan Talk Contributions 17:50, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Emulsion has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:54, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chewing gum. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dougofborg(talk) 17:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

[edit]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Chewing gum worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Roodog2k (talk) 18:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Chewing gum with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ArglebargleIV (talk) 17:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Geothermal electricity. ArglebargleIV (talk) 18:19, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Civil and political rights, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:11, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Panama, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:42, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aliens (film), you may be blocked from editing. Wiki13 (talk) 17:11, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this IP address will be subject to a longer block.

NawlinWiki (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Komodo (island), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. -- RandorXeus. 17:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Komodo (island). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 17:28, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Gordon Ramsay. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you.  ⊃°HotCrocodile…… + 18:06, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Malcolm X (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

May 2012

[edit]

Your recent editing history at Bindi Irwin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 14:07, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

November 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

December 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bolivarian Revolution because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:40, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Environmental issues in New York City. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

January 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

January 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

September 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Peekskill, New York, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 17:38, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Suspension (vehicle) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

May 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Communications protocol because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 17:30, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Gilliam (talk) 17:05, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Brewster High School (Brewster, New York) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 12:51, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Hello71. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Cuisine of the Southern United States— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ⁓ Hello71 13:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Neil Young with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ⁓ Hello71 13:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:65.51.177.162&oldid=1147948241"