User talk:64.183.48.202

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to They're Coming to Take Me Away, Ha-Haaa!, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: They're Coming to Take Me Away, Ha-Haaa! was changed by 64.183.48.202 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93693 on 2011-01-11T20:08:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Est and The Forum in popular culture. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 03:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Jack LaLanne. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This topic has been discussed. Use the Talk page to add your comments first. Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 20:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jack LaLanne. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You are continuing to disrupt this article by ignoring earlier discussions. Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 23:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

What's Up, Doc? (1972 film)

Hello, do you have a citation for that bit about Sorrell Booke nearly drowning? If not, I'll probably have to remove it. Bob talk 19:56, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tatum O'Neal

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Tatum O'Neal. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have multiple warnings on this editing practice in the recent past, and you are now edit warring to preserve a violation of Wikipedia's policy regarding biographies of living persons. These are serious violations and likely to lead to suspensions of editing privileges if you continue, even if your IP address changes. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Bourne Supremacy (film). Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Harmon Killebrew, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 22:31, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Gene McDaniels has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Waterfox ^~talk~ 22:11, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to She's a Fool has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 17:04, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oedipus Rex

Please do a bit of basic reality-checking before adding to articles. It's highly unlikely that Tom Lehrer would have been making jokes about the 1967 version of Oedipus Rex in an album recorded in 1959. —Paul A (talk) 06:47, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2001: A Space Odyssey (film). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. MarnetteD | Talk 01:31, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at 2001: A Space Odyssey (film) shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block. If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. MarnetteD | Talk 01:31, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges, as done at 2001: A Space Odyssey (film)‎. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —EncMstr (talk) 23:31, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2011

Hello and welcome! One of our core policies here is that articles must be written from a neutral point of view, and I've removed one of your recent edits on that basis. If you disagree, please explain on the article's talk page. Thank you! Jim1138 (talk) 23:11, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Your recent edit to the page Deaths in 2012 with this edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 22:59, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Deaths in 2012 with this edit. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 00:05, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Jimmy Castor with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Tgeairn (talk) 00:06, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Castor

I am not interested in arguing over Mr. Castor's age, but please see these results. They all clearly state that he passed away at age 64. I won't revert your edits any longer, but I request that you review that link and make the change yourself if you agree. Thanks, and happy editing! --Tgeairn (talk) 00:16, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.