User talk:45 Wuz
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, 45 Wuz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Galaxies (journal), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 18:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Galaxies (journal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable new journal, too young to have become notable yet. article creation premature. No independent sources, not indexed in any selective major databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 18:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
[edit]Hi 45 Wuz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Nomination of Galaxies (journal) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Galaxies (journal) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galaxies (journal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 10:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Ways to improve Michael Efroimsky
[edit]Hi, I'm Timtrent. 45 Wuz, thanks for creating Michael Efroimsky!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You might also want to research {{Infobox person}} for this page
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Fiddle Faddle 11:02, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Ways to improve Astrodicticum Simplex
[edit]Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. 45 Wuz, thanks for creating Astrodicticum Simplex!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. stubtag.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 03:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Edward Fomalont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to H index
- Sergei Kopeikin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to H index
- Slava Turyshev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to H index
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riq index is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riq index until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 06:52, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Tori index for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tori index is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tori index until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 06:52, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
November 2013
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Danguard00 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. LFaraone 01:11, 25 November 2013 (UTC) |