User talk:45.118.64.227

Recent edits to Passiflora incarnata

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Passiflora incarnata, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ProgrammingGeek^talktome 19:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello, I'm CataracticPlanets. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Bollocks, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CataracticPlanets (talk) 21:42, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2018

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to EdStone. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Donner60 (talk) 03:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. A report in the Daily Mail from an unnamed sourced about a biased or derogatory comment is not a reliable source. The story itself is just rumor and speculation.

As further information, please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Verifiability. Wikipedia is not a forum, blog, soapbox, fan site or advice site. It is an encyclopedia based on reliable, verifiable, third-party sources. It does not publish rumors, personal opinions, commentary, advocacy, original research or unsourced information likely to be changed, challenged or disputed. See also Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Five Pillars, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, Wikipedia:Citing sources, Help:Footnotes, Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. For further information about contributing to Wikipedia, see: Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners; Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Wikipedia:Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:06, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Campden Wonder, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:10, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I'm SovalValtos. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Abingdon-on-Thames, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SovalValtos (talk) 05:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020

Hello, I'm TheAwesomeHwyh. I noticed that you made a change to an article, HM Prison Wakefield, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheAwesome Hwyh 00:22, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Phosphene, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Paleo Neonate – 18:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Number of the Beast (album). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. RandomCanadian (talk | contribs) 01:47, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Noose, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:04, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Waggie. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Execution by firing squad—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Waggie (talk) 05:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Naomi Wolf. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2021

Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Holden HZ, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 00:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2022

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Sarah Game. Thank you. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 17:24, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Struan Rodger—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Webb Miller. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. - Tim1965 (talk) 14:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Moriwen. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Crested pigeon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Moriwen (talk) 03:09, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rainbow lorikeet, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 22:27, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.