User talk:41.92.6.184

July 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of British police officers killed in the line of duty, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Describing another editor as a white suprematist is not helpful. You also appear to be involved in an edit war. Please take to talk page before re-adding. Egghead06 (talk) 11:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at List of British police officers killed in the line of duty shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Well that didn't go well for you did it - even using two IP addresses. You simply won't win pushing non-neutral point of view content. There are too many people - not all white supremacist police officers as you allege - to keep out POV pushers like you. Sorry, nothing personal, just protecting the integrity of the encyclopaedia. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:52, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This one?

IP41, You seem to have strong views on this subject. If you are prepared to stop edit warring, why not direct your efforts to improving List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United Kingdom? Martinevans123 (talk) 11:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.