Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Nearly all the references are to fairly trivial PR-like sources about the companies he is associated with. They don't in themselves established that he is notable in Wikipedia terms.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matisse Eykelberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, 39.48.90.116!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarcGarver (talk) 11:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I appreciate what you were trying to do at COIN but I have revdelled it. I'm not trying to hide anything and it's not because your complaint is without merit, but your report links to an off-wiki site and that cannot be posted on-wiki. I have sent an email to paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org on your behalf so they can investigate this. Clovermoss🍀(talk)03:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It occurs to me that you might not be familiar with the terms I used last night before I went to sleep. They would be Wikipedia:Revision deletion (although that information is now oversighted). Basically, linking to someone's profile on external website (regardless of whether or not it is actually them), is considered personal information. Other private channels deal with this information instead of a publicly visible noticeboard. There is a header at WP:COIN that explains this. Since you're an IP and can't email people, I did it for you. I encourage you to create an account so you can do such things yourself. It's fairly easy and only requires a username and password. Many email services also let you create accounts that don't require you to disclose your identity, if you're worried about that. Let me know if you have any further questions. Clovermoss🍀(talk)15:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.
