User talk:2ofthe22ofthe2022

Welcome!

Hello, 2ofthe22ofthe2022, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Troutfarm27 ^(Talk) 02:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for welcoming me :)

Signal to Notice moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Signal to Notice, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 00:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Axel Sand

The article Axel Sand has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 00:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Javon Walton, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. WP:DOB is one of the more serious aspects of WP:BLP, even more so when we're talking about WP:CHILDren. Toddst1 (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Daniel Rodríguez appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 00:08, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Lindsey Pearlman, you may be blocked from editing. WP:BLP requires very reliable sources - not gossip column fodder. Toddst1 (talk) 03:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Svyatoslav Oliynyk. The next time you publish a living person's date of birth without a reliable source supporting it, you will likely be blocked from editing. Toddst1 (talk) 18:23, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages (including user talk pages) such as Talk:World War III are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. They are not for general discussion about the article topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 15:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Nostradamus. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Svyatoslav Oliynyk

The article Svyatoslav Oliynyk has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Signed,The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 00:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:2ofthe22ofthe2022 The article can be kept if you provide a reliable source saying that he has been a member of the Verkhovna Rada. Please do that, and answer the questions at Talk:Svyatoslav Oliynyk#Where was this translated from?. It would be a shame to lose an article on a notable topic. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:32, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Audrey Price Whelan" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Audrey Price Whelan and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 20#Audrey Price Whelan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Toddst1 (talk) 15:30, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Toddst1 (talk) 23:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which on exactly. 2ofthe22ofthe2022 (talk) 23:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 00:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me i'm not a sockpuppet?! 2ofthe22ofthe2022 (talk) 00:25, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]