User talk:2BondedForLIfe

2BondedForLIfe, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Please help me find which citations need to be changed, if any. Many thanks. 2BondedForLIfe There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

Hi 2BondedForLIfe! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Need some good help to finish

Editorial Colleagues:

Have almost finished the article for Wikipedia, our first for this organization. Tried hard to respect and follow all of the very thoughtfully written guidelines about copyright, Objective Point of View, Notability and Neutrality. Please offer some suggestions on how to improve the article and adding additional categories if needed. Would sincerely appreciate your expertise and experience.

Many thanks

2BondedForLlife 2BondedForLIfe (talk) 23:41, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First article

Distinguished Colleagues: Have just finished first article for Wikipedia: Ronald L. Dirsmith. PLease look over and offer suggestions on how to improve.

Many thanks. 2BondedForLife

Important note

Hi. A very important question for you: is this account being used by — as the name strongly implies — two people? If so, that's a problem.

You're both welcome to edit Wikipedia, but you must do so via separate accounts. Account-sharing is not permitted. Consider what would happen if someone were to vandalize via a shared account: would the innocent be punished along with the guilty, or would the guilty escape punishment to spare the innocent? You see the problem, I hope. To avoid this dilemma, we simply forbid the practice that leads to it.

If this account is in fact being used by two people, I would be within my rights as an administrator to block it right now. Instead, I ask that one of you retain control of the account, change its password, and then post a message on this page to the effect of "I was sharing this account, but now I have made it solely my personal account" or something like that; meanwhile, the other one can start a separate account. If, conversely, only one person was ever using it, then please post a message on this page to the effect of "regardless of the dual implications of my username, only one person is using this account."

Lastly, please allow me to apologize for any inconvenience that this causes you. DS (talk) 00:25, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(If, conversely, only one person was ever using it, then please post a message on this page to the effect of "regardless of the dual implications of my username, only one person is using this account.")

Yes, I am the only person writing this article ...

It is my first time and quite a challenge to even begiin to understand f the very well written requirements. PLease bear with me during this learning period. In fact, if you could suggest a couple of things for me to learn, I will try.

Many thanks to whoever you are.

Dragonfly ...

FYI When I signed on for an account with Wikipedia to start my first article, I wanted to use BondedForLlife ... but it was taken, so I had to settle for 2FoundedForLife.

Thanls for your comments. Have just added a couple more interesting citations on Ronald L.Dirsmith. Do youhave any suggestions on how to improve the article? 2BondedForLife

Speedy deletion nomination of Ronald L. Dirsmith

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ronald L. Dirsmith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.general-books.net/sw2.cfm?q=Ronald_L._Dirsmith. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiddle Faddle 19:52, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]