Jump to content

User talk:29cwcst/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi 29cwcst, Greetings. As you have informed before bouts that is in work, or a rumoured bout is considered unofficial bout and pls do not place in the article or help editing the texts which placed by other editors. Instead, just remove the bout and inform the editor who placed the text on the guidelines. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:12, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi 29wcst, Greetings. Pls note that common names such as countries dont need to wiki link - pls see MOS:OL. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:13, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chris Scott (Australian footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

[edit]

Hi. You don't need to link to an article more than once generally - see MOS:DL. There are times when you might link to something like the Western Australia cricket team in the lead and then maybe in the first section where it's used, but you'd not be looking to link more than that in general - and certainly not twice in the same paragraph! I might have removed links that are worth keeping btw, but I simply reverted first in order to show you this. Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:43, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've just reverted a tonne of your edits for not dealing with the idea of overlinking as I described above. You NEED to engage with other editors and understand that there are ways in which we do things - you're not a total newbie, so read this, understand it and deal with it please. Blue Square Thing (talk) 12:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Jason Behrendorff, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Blue Square Thing (talk) 12:16, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Blue Square Thing (talk) 12:17, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tennis leads

[edit]

Please observe wikipedia MOS Guidelines with regards to leads. It has been brought to the attention of Tennis Project of the poor state of leads in our articles. You can help with the fixing as we always need more hands. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:07, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you keep changing the lead at 2019 Wimbledon Championships – Women's Singles. The Women's Singles, or in Wimbledons case, Ladies Singles, is capitalized in all other similar Wimbledon articles. You leave no summary explaining your changes, in fact you never leave a proper summary. Why is that? Please explain your reasoning. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:18, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Once again no summary or discussion as to why you insist going against guidelines and consensus. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:45, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi 29cwcst, Greetings. Pls note that I have added back the bout which you have removed - see here as the bout has yet to be in the UFC.com fight card yet.


Greetings. Since you have edited a number of pages of MMA related articles in Wikipedia, pls see the below.

  1. Pls visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts and read through the MMA Wikipedia guidelines.
  2. When a bout is announced which stating "finalizing, in work, rumors, verbally agreed, in the press, this means the bout is not official yet. Wait until it official bofore place it under the "Announced bouts" section of the event page.
  3. When a bout is announced in the press, editors put the match up in the "Announced bouts" section (inline citation is needed)
  4. When UFC.com / its local web site (pls check the reference beneath the fight card table in the Wikipedia page), the editors would remove the bout in the "Announced bouts" and place it in the "fight card" section.
  5. When a fighter pulls from a fight (due to injury/or by UFC/ visa issues and etc), we placed the info in the "Background section" (inline citation needed) and remove the injured fighter name and put "TBD".
  6. When a injured fighter has been replaced, editor put the info in the background section (with inline citation). If the new match up has not been shown in the UFC.com fight card, then we will removed the match up from the fight card and place it back to "Announced section". If the match up already shown in the UFC.com then jut put the replacement fighter in the fight card section.
  7. When the event named has been announced (such as UFC Fight Night: dos Santos vs. Tuivasa) then we place the info in the background section (with inline citation). If UFC.com has shown the event name, then editor would move the article and article talk page name accordingly.
  8. No colour box in the fighter's page infobox at event fight card page. No title eliminator in the fight card or body text in fighter page or event page. No (c) - champion on the event fight card unless the fighter is the current champion of the weight division.

Let me know if anything else I could help. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 Wimbledon Championships – Women's Singles‎. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. This has been explained to you time and time again. You do not converse, you do not leave summaries when asked, you are going against MOS leads, you are going against consensus, and you are going against recent Tennis Project requests to bring our articles into compliance. Administrators will soon be involved unless you start to work and play well with others, so please try. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:49, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 29cwcst, Good day. Pls do not change the name to Cowboy vs. Gaethje as the name of the event is as per UFC.com - see here. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:23, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Undertaker, you may be blocked from editing. StaticVapor message me! 16:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UFC 245

[edit]

Hi 29cwcst, Pls note only official announced bout is place under the announced bouts section. No rumors, call out, in works, negotiation stage bouts. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:54, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UFC on ESPN: Overeem vs. Harris. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:08, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at UFC 245, you may be blocked from editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:09, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at UFC Fight Night: Ortega vs. Korean Zombie, you may be blocked from editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 29cwcst, as mentioned to you before, pls check UFC.com event first before change the event name. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Canelo Álvarez. ... richi (hello) 13:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2017 Next Generation ATP Finals, you may be blocked from editing. --Bamyers99 (talk) 01:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

[edit]

How do I move a page under protected settings?

Please help me with...

Moving a page under protected settings. I messaged the user who protected the page from moving, but they don't look like responding to me. 29cwcst (talk) 09:35, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The answer is probably that you don't; pages are generally move-protected for a good reason. If there is a genuine need to move the page, you can raise a request by following the procedures listed at Requested Moves. Yunshui  09:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Canelo Alvarez

[edit]

Per MOS:BOXING, EBU is to be worded as just European. Affiliated regional sanctioning organisations such as the NABF, NABO and USNBC are to be mentioned and linked separately from the main organisation...so WBC-NABF is the standard. The manual of style is clear on those aspects, please leave them be. WBC Silver, as you can see, redirects to 'WBC Silver', so isn’t a duplicate link; it’s necessary as readers may not know what the Silver title is. And per MOS:LINKING, super middleweight is to be linked in Canelo vs. Fielding, it is the first mention outside of the lead. Please leave all this correct information as it is, thanks. — 2.O.Boxing 07:30, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi Pls see MOS:LINKS - no links for country in article and also in the body text, pls do not remove the country as many editor might not know where is Busan. Columbus or etc. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 00:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

On this talk page there are 11 different occasions where other editors have asked you to stop being disruptive/unconstructive, and a warning notice that you could be blocked from editing. You made unconstructive edits to Melbourne Cup again today, mainly reverted. Do it again at your peril. Moriori (talk) 02:40, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI NOTICE

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. See here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#29cwcst_caused_chaotic_dispute_which_led_to_unstable_event_name_change. Regice2020 (talk) 03:52, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi 29cwcst, As mentioned to you many times - no link for country - see MOS:LINK. Please familiar yourself with Wikipedia guidelines. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Canelo Álvarez. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I have already linked the necessary manual of styles to your talk page. Read them and stop your disruptive editing or a report will be made at WP:ANI.— 2.O.Boxing 09:32, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Canelo Álvarez, you may be blocked from editing.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to UFC on ESPN: Overeem vs. Rozenstruik. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:32, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Stop icon This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at UFC Fight Night: Blaydes vs. dos Santos, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Delete of sourced content without explanation - need leave a edit summary CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:46, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:29, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]