User talk:2605:B40:13E7:F600:9D9F:2056:9386:1F45

February 2024

Hello, I'm Filmssssssssssss. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gnawgahyde without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said in the edit summary, it is completely based on primary sources (as are most G.I. Joe articles) 2605:B40:13E7:F600:9D9F:2056:9386:1F45 (talk) 23:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Gnawgahyde, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Shadestar474 ^(talk) 23:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Scrap-Iron, you may be blocked from editing. Luke10.27 (talk) 01:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is 100% primary sources, and not even very good ones 2605:B40:13E7:F600:9D9F:2056:9386:1F45 (talk) 01:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Luke10.27, an explanation was given, before the other revert. Admins, please disregard the level-3 warning. Drmies (talk) 01:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry; I hadn't seen the explanation. I'll be more careful in the future to make sure users removing content have not given a reason. Luke10.27 (talk) 01:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IP, if you use more words in your edit summaries you are less likely to be reverted. Drmies (talk) 01:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough 2605:B40:13E7:F600:9D9F:2056:9386:1F45 (talk) 01:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.