Jump to content

User talk:2401:BA80:A10D:8ED0:1798:4B58:1A38:2FE9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: ICareBilling (November 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 05:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 2401:BA80:A10D:8ED0:1798:4B58:1A38:2FE9! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 05:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ICareBilling (November 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 07:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ICareBilling (November 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Despite multiple earlier declines, there is not a hint of notability: none of the sources cited meets the WP:GNG standard, and a Google search finds nothing better. Not only that, but there isn't any suggestion of noteworthiness either: this describes a ROTM business that does some stuff. Considering all that, I can only conclude that the subject is not sufficiently notable to warrant inclusion, and to save more reviewer time being expended I am now rejecting rather than merely declining this draft.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]