User talk:24.227.34.10

Atlantis

I feel you will need to read wp:editwar before you start. Slatersteven (talk) 15:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What’s so wrong with having disagreements? I know for a fact Atlantis is real. -24.227.34.10 (talk) 15:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can disagree all you want, but if you do not have wp:consensus you can't change what an article says. Slatersteven (talk) 15:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just think Atlantis is real. -24.227.34.10 (talk) 15:26, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may do, but published scientists do not agree, they trump your opinion. So (as I said in the talk page) you will get reverted if you are do not edit war. Slatersteven (talk) 15:27, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All content must be sourced, stop adding your wp:or to articles, this is now a warning, not advice. Slatersteven (talk) 15:36, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to read wp:tenditious as right now you are heading for a block. Every user who has responded has told you you are wrong, it is now time to WP:DROPIT. Slatersteven (talk) 15:56, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it existed when I was a kid. I still do. What’s so wrong with that? -2600:1005:B141:C706:C90B:7FCD:B250:F36F (talk) 16:01, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing, but trying to insist we accept it is what is wrong. Slatersteven (talk) 16:03, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. Is it too late for me to be a good editor? -2600:1005:B141:C706:C90B:7FCD:B250:F36F (talk) 16:06, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, but it will not help you case if you edit war at the talk page, its been closed accept it. Slatersteven (talk) 16:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. I’ll accept it. -2600:1005:B141:C706:C90B:7FCD:B250:F36F (talk) 16:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello! I'm Riverbend21. Your recent edit(s) to the page Atlantis: The Lost Empire appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Riverbend21 (talk) 15:47, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

My apologies. -24.227.34.10 (talk) 15:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just think Atlantis is real. -24.227.34.10 (talk) 23:31, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Snyder. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Daniel Snyder was changed by 24.227.34.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.922257 on 2022-10-24T01:18:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 01:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Atlantis. MrOllie (talk) 01:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May I please have a second chance? -24.227.34.10 (talk)|

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 03:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Why was I blocked? -24.227.34.10 (talk) 03:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oct 2022

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.227.34.10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m sorry I vandalized the talk page. I was raised to believe in Atlantis and thought it was real. My apologies. 24.227.34.10 (talk) 03:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your unblock request is trolling. An early unblock looks unlikely to say the least. PhilKnight (talk) 04:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How did I troll? -24.227.34.10 (talk) 04:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe you when you say you though Atlantis was real. PhilKnight (talk) 04:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do believe it’s real. Troy was real. I even said it on the talk page. Atlantis is real whether you believe in it or not. Idiot. -24.227.34.10 (talk) 04:43, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An early unblock looks very unlikely. PhilKnight (talk) 04:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why? -24.227.34.10 (talk) 04:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because you need to show you understood what you did was wrong, not try and convince us is it was not. The fact you said you would drop this matter, and yet instead resorted to edit warring (despite being warned not to) to continue to have the last word was does not look like you intended to drop it. Slatersteven (talk) 09:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was also the issue of your wp:blp violation over at Daniel Snyder. Slatersteven (talk) 09:12, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also just noticed your violation of wp:npa above, which will also not go in your favour. You need to read out policies and agree to abide by them. Slatersteven (talk) 10:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Why?" Try reading WP:UNBLOCK Sweetpool50 (talk) 09:46, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve read them all now. -24.227.34.10 (talk) 12:16, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking this block duration is too short. Acroterion (talk) 12:40, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.227.34.10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I now know that what I did was wrong and I admit to it. I have since read all of Wikipedia’s policies and will absolutely abide by all of them from now on. If unblocked early, j will be making useful and truthful edits to pages in the field of sports. Thank you. 24.227.34.10 (talk) 12:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no benefit to unblocking you early and nothing here convinces me you won't just keep trolling once the block expires. Yamla (talk) 12:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You’re an idiot then. -24.227.34.10 (talk) 12:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear you have not read any of them from that reply. All you most likely have just done is earned a longer block and maybe a revocation of talk page access, for making PA's. [User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] (talk) 13:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you have the balls to do it, then do it. -24.227.34.10 (talk) 14:16, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Acroterion (talk) 16:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

I highly reccomend that User 24.227.34.10 read and be aware of wp:sock. Paul H. (talk) 03:06, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.