User talk:209.174.153.2

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 209.174.153.2, is registered to Illinois Century Network and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

September 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Poison ivy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 15:09, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Poison ivy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. abf /talk to me/ 15:12, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Ships at a Distance (talk) 17:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Malacostraca has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 13:36, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Glitter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~ Troy (talk) 19:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vladimir Putin, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Vladimir Putin was changed by 209.174.153.2 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-02-12T20:56:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Versus22_talk 20:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tucker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — TKD::Talk 16:55, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2009

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Cuban jazz worked, and it has been automatically reverted. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here. Thank you.
SoxBot III (talk | owner) 19:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Cuban jazz. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 19:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Anubis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps ^{Wake me} 13:37, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Duke Ellington, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MMS2013 20:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Siege of Vicksburg, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Siege of Vicksburg was changed by 209.174.153.2 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-01-05T19:54:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Soldering. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 14:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Soldering. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. P Carn (talk) 14:39, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Ethical arguments regarding torture has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. -- EdTrist talk contribs 18:51, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ginseng, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ginseng was changed by 209.174.153.2 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-04-06T19:30:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:31, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Marshmallow, you will be blocked from editing. -- Why Not A Duck 18:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Marshmallow, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Marshmallow was changed by 209.174.153.2 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-04-08T18:57:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:57, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Common Parsley Frog has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. MJ94 (talk) 15:45, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of mountain ranges, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Alperen (talk) 18:56, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Academic Ranking of World Universities has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:48, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kent Austin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kent Austin was changed by 209.174.153.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950584 on 2010-12-07T16:51:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Siege of Vicksburg, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Siege of Vicksburg was changed by 209.174.153.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9656 on 2011-01-03T20:03:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:03, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Siege of Vicksburg constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Hazel77 ^talk 20:07, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Siege of Vicksburg. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Hazel77 ^talk 20:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Siege of Vicksburg, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 20:11, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mkativerata (talk) 20:13, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pensacola Beach, Florida with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 16:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Wikipelli. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Brazilian Carnival with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Wikipelli ^Talk 21:48, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Margaret Gorman, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Margaret Gorman was changed by 209.174.153.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972896 on 2012-02-01T19:36:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to USS Enterprise (CV-6), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: USS Enterprise (CV-6) was changed by 209.174.153.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910839 on 2012-04-12T16:47:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:48, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to USS Enterprise (CV-6) has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Monty ₈₄₅ 16:52, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Naval ship with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Monty ₈₄₅ 16:53, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at USS Enterprise (CVN-65), you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: USS Enterprise (CVN-65) was changed by 209.174.153.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864629 on 2012-04-13T14:02:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:02, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Philip Sousa, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Philip Sousa was changed by 209.174.153.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943227 on 2012-04-20T17:12:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ellen Raskin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ellen Raskin was changed by 209.174.153.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2012-04-20T17:36:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sand cat, you may be blocked from editing. Seduisant (talk) 18:25, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2012

Hello, I'm Webclient101. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kleptomania without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Webclient101 (talk) 17:36, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.