User talk:208.47.202.254

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

This IP address, 208.47.202.254, is registered to ACE INA Holdings Inc. and may be shared by many users of an enterprise network, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history.

Recent edit to Attack Force (video game)

Hello! Regarding your recent edit, please note that it's standard, especially in 8-bit game articles, to put the author information in the initial paragraph. Ditto for a brief description of the game itself. There are hundreds of examples of this; no need to add named sections containing very little information. Dgpop (talk) 23:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (208.47.202.254) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 23:26, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! 208.47.202.254 (talk) 23:26, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@208.47.202.254: You're welcome! Feel free to reach out if you ever have any questions about editing Wikipedia, and I strongly encourage you to create an account. But either way, any help is always welcome

cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 13:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Pathfinder and D&D

Due to the large number of pathfinder sales, players and games and the fact that it is a derivative of D&D 3.5e the consensus on the talk page was that it deserved a mention somewhere in either 3.5e or 4e. Additionally it should be clear why pathfinder was so popular among people who chose to play an alternative to 4e (with some people even calling it 3.75e).

Thank you for reading, El komodos drago (talk to me) 13:50, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cover organisation

Sorry I did't realise you'd literally just reorganised the page before I did, just thought I'd add in some hidden content to keep things a bit neater. If activity starts picking up and the list grows it may be worth setting up a proper page for keeping track? CrimsonFox ^talk 15:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, that's a good idea. :) Yeah, whatever works best! There are thousands of articles that need covers, but I am only going to request the ones that I was looking at, but who knows who else might have some ideas they want to explore! 208.47.202.254 (talk) 16:06, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request of screenshot of Pokemon Scarlet and Violet

Hey! I reverted your screenshot request for Pokemon Scarlet and Violet because the games aren't released yet and won't be for a few months, therefore making a screenshot of the game impossible. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:47, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fair enough. 208.47.202.254 (talk) 14:55, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you understand. When the game actually releases then a request for a screenshot would be more appropriate. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request of screenshot for Return to Monkey Island

Hello! I reverted your screenshot request for Return to Monkey Island because the game has not been released yet. Thanks anyway for the edit, it has been a reminder of one of the things to do later. ► LowLevel73 ^(talk) 03:01, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough! 208.47.202.254 (talk) 13:33, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm Deltaspace42. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ironsworn have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Deltaspace42 (talk) 19:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi User:Deltaspace42, I'm wondering how removing a non-existing category and replacing it with the correct category is not constructive? 208.47.202.254 (talk) 19:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That was my mistake, sorry. Name didn't look right, should've checked it first. I'll revert my reversal. Deltaspace42 (talk) 19:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About the Red Ghost and Diablo pages

I think one sentence is enough to cover 60 years of appearances. Sundropie (talk) 23:41, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how, can you explain? 208.47.202.254 (talk) 15:14, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Apologies for overstepping with my cleanup of this talk page and Happy New Year! S0091 (talk) 21:58, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries at all! Thanks for looking out for me in the first place. :) Happiest of New Years to you as well! 208.47.202.254 (talk) 22:02, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters (1974–76) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters (1974–76). Thanks! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:32, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters (1974–76) (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nagol0929 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters (1974–76) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nagol0929 (talk) 13:34, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 208.47.202.254! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nagol0929 (talk) 13:34, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Virgil (The Walking Dead) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Virgil (The Walking Dead) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virgil (The Walking Dead) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.