User talk:205.211.52.10

New messages will appear at the bottom of this page.

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 205.211.52.10, is registered to Algonquin College and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.

Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to George W. Bush. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --W.marsh 14:46, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Built to Spill

Thanks for your compliment. I will try to find a more recent photo of the band to put in the article this week. There certainly have been changes since that photo was taken . . . - Jersyko·talk 05:17, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Lebanon. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Gurch 16:40, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks on Black British

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Wildnox 22:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Pussy

Your recent edit to Pussy (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 08:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding reversions[1] made on October 25 2006 to J. Philippe Rushton

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning, but aviod making any reverts within 24 hours of this warning in order to avoid any confusion. Nishkid64 01:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, but the community decision was reached on the talk page. If you want to discuss the page, and try to make suggestions in how the page can be fixed up and brought up to par, be my guest. If you want to discuss and/or try to validate your point, then feel free to do so in a civilized and productive manner. Thanks. Nishkid64 01:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the semi-protection there, but that does not mean that you should change it so drastically without discussion. If you are removing material per WP:BLP make sure you cite BLP and remove only unsourced statements. If there is some sourced criticism, it should probably stay in but be phrased in a much more neutral manner, not removed (unless it is nothing more than: "his work is laughable", which I removed) The article does need major clean up and major balancing out, but edit warring over it will not help that happen. If the revert warring continues the article might need to be fully protected.--Konst.able^Talk 03:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

Do not threaten that they will be blocked permanently or calling other users "idiot" as you did to RamDrake and Asams10. You will be blocked if you continue to do so. This is your final and only warning. Any more of this, and you will be blocked for a period of time. Nishkid64 20:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for trying to help with the Rushton article

I see you attempted to work a compromise with the Rushton critics by removing both the theory and the criticism section. To me it's so obviously biased that I'm shocked that they can't see it. For example, the entire praise section is from the pioneer fund, so the praise section is just a subtle way of trying to bash him some more. I just wish they'd come out and admit that they want to censor his ideas, because this "biography's not a place to discuss his theory, but it is a place to discuss criticism of his theory is really laughable". I could even agree with removing his ideas from wikipedia because they aren't proven and could be socially damaging. But what frustrates me is that they only want to censor his theory, while using his article as a platform to completely discredit him. Minorcorrections 05:54, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Abhishek

Your recent edit to Abhishek (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

January 2007

Your changes to Chemistry

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ann Stouter 04:01, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Chocolate, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- WolfKeeper 00:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Optical fiber, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. johnpseudo 16:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to contribute to this encyclopedia, please
create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, editing by anonymous users from your school or institution's IP address is currently disabled. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this address is probably also disabled.

If accounts need to be created at school for class projects, please have your teacher or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website.
Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may email us using your school-issued email address and an account will be created for you.

Thank you.

Comments: Kafziel ^Talk 17:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Duress

Your recent edit to Duress (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 19:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Intranet, you will be blocked from editing. Pablo Talk | Contributions 22:15, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 20:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Wide Area Augmentation System, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron⁸³ 15:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Hall effect. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.E Wing (talk) 14:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gary Bettman, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gary Bettman was changed by 205.211.52.10 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-12-04T14:48:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 14:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Notre Dame High School (Ottawa), even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron⁸³ 15:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gang Green (album). Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Spellcast (talk) 08:56, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Pillow, you will be blocked from editing. Mdwyer (talk) 03:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Electric motor, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Electric motor was changed by 205.211.52.10 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-06-22T18:25:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fibromyalgia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Chamal ^Talk 13:58, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hawiye. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:23, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Inuit. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 03:44, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jock Boy 00:28, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gloucester High School (Ottawa). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DOUBLEBLUE (talk) 20:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Number Munchers, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Number Munchers was changed by 205.211.52.10 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-02-06T12:51:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page 12 basic principles of animation has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 00:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 12 basic principles of animation, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Fastily (talk) 00:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Talk:12 basic principles of animation. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 00:44, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 12 basic principles of animation, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: 12 basic principles of animation was changed by 205.211.52.10 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-03-03T00:44:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:44, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Taro has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 21:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Resident Evil: Extinction, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Resident Evil: Extinction was changed by 205.211.52.10 (u) (t) deleting 46656 characters on 2009-03-16T05:42:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Adobe Flex, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Adobe Flex was changed by 205.211.52.10 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-03-20T15:13:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:13, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Asher Roth. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 06:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you deface a page, as you did with this edit to Nero. Alansohn (talk) 15:30, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Alexf^(talk) 16:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bush (band), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bsa dow ski1 17:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to One Tree Hill (TV series), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: One Tree Hill (TV series) was changed by 205.211.52.10 (u) (t) deleting 42147 characters on 2009-11-03T22:36:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:36, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Biggy Jiggy Mixtapes, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Alan - talk 00:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Somalia Affair has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk) 16:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Algonquin College, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jmanfffreak (talk) 21:26, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Global (cutlery) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Addi hockey 10 15:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Whoopi Goldberg, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. E. Fokker (talk) 23:54, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sioux Lookout, Ontario, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:51, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Stittsville, Ontario has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. The Thing ^T/_C 19:38, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to List of people who have claimed to be Jesus constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Funandtrvl (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to List of people who have claimed to be Jesus. Funandtrvl (talk) 21:01, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:19, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to I Am (Texas in July album) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 20:52, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Into Thin Air, you may be blocked from editing. Qwrk (talk) 19:44, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to LMFAO (group) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trusilver 17:20, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ajax, Ontario with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! Tiderolls 02:31, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ajax, Ontario with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tiderolls 02:34, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ajax, Ontario with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Tiderolls 02:35, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Helvetica, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. McGeddon (talk) 16:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Daniel Yergin, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Edinburgh Wanderer 23:34, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Ginger Kids was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- The Red Pen of Doom 20:59, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Netball, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 13:25, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2012

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Biotechnology, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Wikipelli ^Talk 12:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Biotechnology with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:55, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Fiedler contingency model that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Lugia2453 (talk) 20:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello, I'm Vacation9. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Aerosolization because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Vacation^nine 02:30, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2014

Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Graduate University for Advanced Studies, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Wes Anderson. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 14:37, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to 2 Baruch because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Gilliam (talk) 05:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Ernesto Valverde. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:27, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.