User talk:2006toyotacorrola/Archive 1

Archive 1

September 2022

Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Phosphate mining in Banaba and Nauru—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TheEpTic (talk) 13:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, 2006toyotacorrola, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:24, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Getting started

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

Finding your way around

• Table of contents
• Directories and indexes
• Department directory

Editing articles

• How to develop an article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help

• Frequently asked questions
• Cheatsheet
• Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
• The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
• Help pages
• Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

• Community Portal
• Join a WikiProject
• Follow Wikipedia etiquette
• Practice civility
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! 2006toyotacorrola, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 21:24, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Hello, I'm Wasell. I noticed that you recently removed content from E. Duke Vincent without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Wasell^(T) 🌻🇺🇦 17:15, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Caetano Levante, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 08:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

i forgot to cite sources 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 08:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

2023 London Marathon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2023 London Marathon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 08:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

that makes a lot of sense 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 08:47, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Military Channel J

The page User:Military Channel J has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

not needed

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 13:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do not post such statements on the user pages of others, in general, only the named user should be editing their user page. Most exceptions are for official notices posted by admins. The block log notes that the user is blocked. 331dot (talk) 13:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

ahh, ok i'm sorry 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 13:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 London Marathon (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 London Marathon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 07:42, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Teahouse answers

As ARoseWolf, Maproom, and Tigraan have told you, I suggest you refrain from answering questions at the Teahouse until you are sure that your answer is correct and helpful. As Maproom said, your answer to a user asking why (or potentially why not) their article was appearing in Google search being "all of them do" is completely incorrect. Yes the majority of articles here on Wikipedia do appear in a Google search, however new articles take time to appear in Google search. Next, your response of "yes you do using the COI wizard" is not helpful at all or even correct. No such thing exists and it doesn't even answer the question the user asked, being "Do I have a COI in this case and do I/how should I declare it?". You need to slow down and become more familiar with Wikipedia's policies before answering more questions. If you don't know the answer to a question then don't answer it. No answer is better than an incorrect answer. I know this firsthand as when I was new to Wikipedia, I attempted to help answer Teahouse questions myself, however I ended up creating trouble since my answers tended to be incorrect and unhelpful (check my earlier talk archives and you'll see me getting told about it). I was told to stop answering questions on the Teahouse until I felt that I would be able to answer questions correctly and helpfully. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:49, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

The first one was a mistake on my,part, the second one i meant the edit wizard and i will research the policies/guidelines next time, and i am sorry 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 17:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Right, but the edit request wizard wasn't really a correct answer either. It takes time to learn all of this, so hang in there. David10244 (talk) 07:36, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

I think i might’ve made an fiasco trying to be helpful… 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 17:24, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

At Krazzy Kiya Re you again added a non-useful reply. Please refrain from answering queries at Teahouse until you have a better understanding. Althougn an editor does not need to be officially a host to answer, most of the hosts have years and thousands of edits in their history. David notMD (talk) 10:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Adoption

What do you mean here "Please add me"? Sarrail (talk) 16:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

I wanted someone to add me to the list but i’ve changed my mind, so you can delete that if you want. 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 17:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Moving pages to draft

When you are moving pages to draftspace, such as Draft:A Profound Waste of Time, please remember to a) notify the user and b) tag the redirect for speedy deletion. If you install this script, it can do it automatically; however, I would suggest refraining from draftifying pages until you have more experience. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 11:52, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

ok i'm sorry, it was my first time doing so. 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, 2006toyotacorrola,

While Ingenuity is technically correct, I do not think you have the editing or article creation experience to know when draftification is appropriate for a main space article. The article you moved to Draft space was moved back to main space so this just ends up frustrating the page creator. For some reason, new editors are often drawn to the administration side of Wikipedia, rather than improving articles, but some tasks just require a lot of experience to understand the policy and guidelines and know when actions are appropriate and when maybe a different approach is appropriate. I know this can be frustrating for young editors but experience just comes with time and steady activity. I recommend you talk to Blaze and other young editors who are about a year ahead of where you are now. They can offer you good advice and also point where you could really help out. WikiProjects can be a great place to connect with editors with similar interests and you can always try out Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy where you can learn more about how to fight vandalism. Learning through a set-up program or getting a mentor can make the road to becoming an experienced editor go more smoothly. Good luck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:34, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

WP:NPOV "vio" of an anti-vandal edit

Explain to me why you reverted an edit by Felida that was clearly anti-vandalism because it was WP:NPOV? I'm referring to this edit. You should know that you hold the responsibility for any edits you make using semi-automated tools. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:00, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

i rushed into the tool without taking time to learn it, and i misunderstood how it worked, sorry 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Thanks for contributing to the article University Hospital Coventry. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 09:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

i've got 2, 3 maybe? sources 1. https://bustimes.org/operators/national-express-coventry 2.https://nxbus.co.uk/coventry/services-timetables 3. google maps? 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 09:34, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

please could you cite these? i've only ever cited once and i'm still unsure on how to. NX coventry might be the only reliable one though 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 09:36, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi - I have added the NX coventry source as a citation. Dormskirk (talk) 15:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

thanks 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 15:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Hello, I'm JustinTime55. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Launch pad have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. JustinTime55 (talk) 18:56, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 2006toyotacorrola. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 09:04, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

did....did i just warn myself? 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 09:43, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Deprodding of David ben Joseph Coen Bakri

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from David ben Joseph Coen Bakri, which you proposed for deletion. Sources are available that are not from wikipedia that predate the wikipedia article including the 1906 Jewish Enclopedia. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! TartarTorte 15:19, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Oh, ok 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 15:58, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

SLOW YOUR ROLL.

Seriously, man, you've been on Wikipedia for barely two months, and you have a bare handful of edits. You've been filing prods, and filing AfDs, and trying to answer Teahouse questions, and moving pages to draftspace, and operating anti-vandalism tools, and you don't have the experience to do any of these things. I can see that your talk page is littered with cautions and warnings about them. Wikipedia is neither a race nor a competition (and even if it was, there are quite a few editors with twenty years' headstart). You're ten times better off taking your time, working on simple editing of articles, working on improving your own grammar, and leaving more advanced tasks until you have the time and expertise to tackle them.

I didn't file my first AfD, for instance, until I'd been on Wikipedia for nearly a year. I'd had well over a thousand edits, and had participated in numerous AfDs ... and the article I'd nominated was a unverifiable hoax. It was over a dozen years and fifty thousand edits in before I was answering Teahouse questions or taking on New Pages Patrol. People work at different speeds, of course, and your enthusiasm is a positive. Use it to learn before leaping. Ravenswing 14:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

I concur. You recently warned and IP for an edit they made but didn't even revert the edit. Slow down before you get yourself into trouble. This is speaking from someone who was also over-enthusiastic when they first started. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

i'm ok with the block - it's just that i don't understand why you've done this - and 'not here to build an encyclopedia is very broad', so please could you give me the specific reason. 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 14:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

There are more details in your block log.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

will this prevent me from editing wikivoyage? 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 15:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

No.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:54, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Unblock request

[placeholder/draft, disregard, for now]

I am requesting that my block is reviewed. I believe that, if i am unblocked,i would be able to edit this web site in accordance with rules and guidelines. Whilst, at the time of the block, i was immature, i do not belove this to be the case any more. 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 14:28, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Requesting unblock

{{unblock|reason= I am requesting that my block is reviewed. I believe that, if i am unblocked,i would be able to edit this web site in accordance with rules and guidelines. Whilst, at the time of the block, i was highly immature and foolish, i do not believe this to be the case any more. I have changed an awful lot as a person since then and, this time, I will look before I take the proverbial leap. Even if you decide not to un-block me. Whist at the time of my block, I must admit, I was just a member of wikipedia to waste time away. However, if I am unblocked, be assured that this will no longer be the case. I was unaware that you weren’t supposed to welcome users who hadn’t edited - this will no longer happen (when I’m unblocked). thank you for taking time out of your day to read this~~~~}} 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 17:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Unblock request

{{unblock|reason= I am requesting that my block is reviewed. I believe that, if i am unblocked,i would be able to edit this web site in accordance with rules and guidelines. Whilst, at the time of the block, i was highly immature and foolish, i do not believe this to be the case any more. I have changed an awful lot as a person since then and, this time, I will look before I take the proverbial leap. Even if you decide not to un-block me. Whist at the time of my block, I must admit, I was just a member of wikipedia to waste time away. However, if I am unblocked, be assured that this will no longer be the case. I was unaware that you weren’t supposed to welcome users who hadn’t edited - this will no longer happen (when I’m unblocked). thank you for taking time out of your day to read this, whether you unblock me or not. ~~~~}} 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 17:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Wootton, Northamptonshire

Wootton is a former village about 3 miles (4.8 km) south of Northampton town centre that is now part of Northampton.

Wootton is separated from Hardingstone by the Newport Pagnell Road the B526, formerly part of the A50 road. Part of Wootton is alongside the A45 dual carriageway from the M1 to Wellingborough which is seen and heard from that part of the area.

History

Domesday Book

In the Domesday Book of 1086, Wootton is described as "Wetone". It later became Weton, Wutton and then Witton. "Wootton" appeared in the 14th century. The names probably have the Saxon origin of "Wudutun" and mean settlement or farmstead in, or by, a wood, which may have been Salcey Forest.

Church

The thirteenth-century Parish Church of St George the Martyr stands in the High Street in a conservation area, and is a Grade 1 listed building. It was restored in 1865. It was again restored and re-dedicated in 1991 after a £93,000 restoration programme had been successfully completed.

The Rectory, west of the church is dated 1630. A memorial in the south wall is to the wife of John Harris – the Lord of the Manor in the eighteenth century.

17th and 18th centuries

Little of Wootton dates from earlier than Stuart times. Most of the stone houses are late 17th or early 18th century. Many of these houses were originally thatched, as can be seen from the steep pitch of the roof.

Many brick cottages are at least as old with those in Church Hill, at least 1770s, as they are mentioned in the Enclosure Act of 1779. Wootton had its own brick works along Berry Lane. A nearby field was known as Clay Pit field as late as 1932, but even in 1899, it was known as the "Old" Brick Works and used for many years as an ash tip. The Department of the Environment listed Carey's Cottage in Berry Lane as 16th century.

19th century

There is some documentary evidence that there was a short-lived attempt to extract iron ore at Wootton in a field "at the back of the workhouse." The ore was probably taken to Bridge Street Station at Northampton by horse and cart. The report is in the Northampton Mercury for 24 January 1852. It implies that the quarrying began some time in 1851 (the same year that quarrying for iron began at Blisworth). It is likely that this was a trial which resulted in the quarry opened at Hardingstone later in 1852. The Hardingstone quarry was a few hundred yards to the east on the other side of Newport Pagnell Road. This is one of the earliest written reports of iron ore extraction in Northamptonshire. According to an 1881 Ordinance Survey map, there was a limekiln, and a corn windmill in the town.

Royal Pioneer Corps

The Northamptonshire Regiment and later Royal Pioneer Corps were stationed at the former Quebec Barracks, later renamed Simpson Barracks on a large site adjacent to the Newport Pagnell Road which include the old Hardingstone workhouse building which dates from 1839. The Barracks closed on 1 April 1993 and the site is now used for a housing estate, including the old workhouse, many road names reflecting its military origin. During the second world war the corps had an ammunition dump hidden in woods at Yardley Chase, where signs still remain.

1980s urban expansion

The village backs on to several modern housing estates including Wootton Fields and the area previously occupied by the army barracks. The development and loss of village character occurred during the 1980s and 1990s as the town expanded south towards the M1 motorway near junction 15 and is next to the large housing estates of Wootton Fields, Grange Park, Simpson Manor and East Hunsbury.

2008 expansion proposals

Further urban expansion of Northampton was being planned in October 2008 with another 13,500 houses and additional infrastructure in the rural areas around Grange Park, Quinton and Preston Deanery.