User talk:2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0

May 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shahid Khaqan Abbasi. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Follow he rules, and discuss on the artcle talk page and address the issues, and let do neutral editors, you fall under WP:COI and WP:Ownership

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your thread has been archived

Hi 2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Hegemony, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shahid Khaqan Abbasi

Please see the three tags at the top of the page, Shahid Khaqan Abbasi. A good article request will not be considered if there are tags on the page. Try and fix these issues first by following the links on the tags for more info. comrade waddie96 (talk) 09:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, after addressing the issues by the major contributors, I may re-request.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, you may be blocked from editing. comrade waddie96 (talk) 09:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I will care.

Zealous tagging

Please consider that overzealous tagging of articles is counterintuitive and doesn't actually improve Wikipedia. Try actually fixing the problem which isn't as big a task as tagging. Kind regards, comrade waddie96 (talk) 13:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've had to go over all your contributions and revert tags and fix the articles for you. comrade waddie96 (talk) 13:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that, I try to improve rather than tagging, thanks.

May 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shahid Khaqan Abbasi. Saqib (talk) 15:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Orientls (talk) 17:27, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Please stop your promotion of Ehsan Sehgal on the AfD and please don't copy other people's comments on the current AfD. Störm (talk) 00:44, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. v/r - T P 14:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I am not familiar with the rules nor edited previously, I thought, I am explaining fairness and neutrality for good-faith contributors and try to save an article that has more than 31 reliable sources that are ignored. I cannot realize what spam I did? - However, my apologies if you let me express my opinion, it does not harm the project but maybe some users do not like it. Let me unblock, I care in my comments. Thanks.2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 (talk) 15:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm seeing clear promotional pushing, together with attacks on other contributors at the AFD discussion. We can do without that kind of disruptive approach. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Any administrator reviewing this should look at this and this before unblocking.--v/r - T P 15:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 I suggest that you drop the stick and move on. Posting a new version on this page, which contradicts the purpose of this page, will neither change the outcome of the discussion, bring Ehsan Sehgal back, nor helps your cause. Victor Schmidt (talk) 08:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no problem. thanks, 2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 (talk) 09:57, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.