User talk:1ForTheMoney/Archive 5

Userbox

I need help putting the Userbox in my profile. Simbaha1 on World 43 04:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simbaha2 (talk • contribs)

Judging by your userpage you want to add the RuneScape userbox. I shall leave the instructions on your talk page. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 08:37, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Simbaha2 (talk • contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 14:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your hard work on Category:Infobox cricketer using deprecated parameters. Magioladitis (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. And now it's empty. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 20:29, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Steward elections

Hi, I see you've voted in the Steward elections. However, you do not seem to have a global account, and as such our guidelines require that there be both a link from meta to your main userpage and from said main userpage to meta, so we can verify that you are indeed the same person. Could you be so kinda as to put a link from User:1ForTheMoney to your meta userpage? Many thanks, Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 23:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had a premonition someone would ask. Let me move my meta-userbox to be more prominent. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, I had missed that. Hoo has marked you as being eligible I see :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 03:28, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you should feel free to move it back into hiding, there's no requirement that it be prominent, I just hadn't thought that it could be in there, now that we know it, there should be no issues in keeping it inside the section :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 03:29, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, but this didn't come up last year... 1ForTheMoney (talk) 14:24, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

Hey, I just wanted to apologize for the vandalism on the page "Jagex", I left myself logged in and went away for a bit.... My immature little brother must've been on it :( sorry. (He hates Jagex, I'm not sure why.) Nerdablurdaturd (talk) 04:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, okay. But those were the first two edits registered to your account (plus the little brother defence doesn't work on everyone.) 1ForTheMoney (talk) 08:42, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know that seems like a lame excuse. However, I will be able to prove it once you see that no more vandalism occurs from this account. The main reason for no constructive edits is I was off the "Needs work" account creation screen before I could read it, and I couldn't find anything that needed work. Could you link me to those pages? Nerdablurdaturd (talk) 18:00, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And WOW, I didn't know there was a joke page on that, haha. (I'll admit, it was pretty funny.) I'm serious though. It's actually his 13'th birthday today 0.0 Nerdablurdaturd (talk) 18:06, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It may be a joke page, but there is a serious point - while people will give you the benefit of the doubt the first time, if it happens again they probably won't be so lenient. (The page was actually created because a lot of vandals who get blocked try using that as an excuse.)

On a much happier note, for pages that need work this page is a good start. You could also follow the instructions at User:SuggestBot to receive regular notices about articles you could improve. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 19:32, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2fortheshow

Just wanted to say I dig the user name! :) Cheers! Subzzee (talk) 22:08, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Chalk it up to thinking of random phrases and picking whichever one came first. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 22:22, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RuneScape Revision

Yes, I am well aware that Wikipedia isn't a game guide. No, I am not trying to ignite a WikiFight. RuneScape's Fictional universe counts as one. Creating a page would be pointless, and putting it there would be more convenient, as with Warcraft's Azeroth. Soo... Cans I has segment back pls? Good day, sir. 00:59, 25 March 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by YOPbottle (talk • contribs)

Just because WOW has a section on its fictional universe doesn't mean RuneScape needs or should have one - and the reason is that reliable sources have not talked about it. Sadly, it's a simple fact that RS (the game or the universe) does not get a lot of mainstream coverage. If you really think we should have a section, start a discussion on the talk page and it can be opened for wider review.

(Later note) Hmm, I see that Gielinor was removed from the list of fictional universes as well. I'm guessing that has something to do with this? 1ForTheMoney (talk) 01:29, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Good day, sir. 21:14, 25 March 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by YOPbottle (talk • contribs)

RE:Image

Sorry about that, so should I rescale my image back to Sigma's (former uploader of the image) dimensions? TerryAga (talk) 00:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You won't get the exact size since your image has an aspect ratio of 16:9 while Sigma's was 4:3. See if using this tool does anything - images are something I can't do. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 00:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RuneScape

I had not noticed you included the information and cite in the alternative section and believed it should be added in the more prominent sections; assuming you were just being an ass by continiously removing them. :P All is good now though. Fazart (talk) 19:37, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've been that way for five and a half years. So far, there have been very few disputes. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 20:04, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fix page title

Hi there,

Can you please fix the title of the following page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosalind_Boyd

She is Rosalie Boyd not Rosalind.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan roselli (talk • contribs) 08:58, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done 1ForTheMoney (talk) 11:38, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RuneScape

As a player of the game itself, I can assure you "RS" is most definitely the most used way of referring to the game...

However, I have a more important question for you. There's no mention of one of the major updates to the game. I don't know if you play the game or not, but it's an item called the bond. One item? That's not major! Well, the item was introduced to create a means of purchasing in game money with real world currency. It's a complete 180 from their original stances, so I think it's ground breaking enough to add to the article. Do you agree? If so, would I put it under the game updates section or the rules and cheating section (as it is strongly related to third party goldfarming).

I'm fine with the revert. I just added it because it was removed from RS with the reason "no indication in the article of being known by the initials". I saw you were the reverter and wanted to ask for your input on the edit I have mostly completed since you're one of the major contributors to the page. mol uɐɯ 15:34, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I'm not against being bold. I've already made the edit, but I would still appreciate your feedback on my contribution. mol uɐɯ 16:00, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted mainly because it's only players that use RS, while most people outside it (including Jagex themselves) use RuneScape. Since all our sources spell out the full name there's no written evidence that RS is a really common abbreviation. Compare this to the Jagex article - their full name is Jagex Game Studios but everyone calls them Jagex so that can be noted as an abbreviation.

As for bonds, I was going to encourage you to be bold anyway so I can't criticise you. I'll look more closely at it later (and then probably end up deleting most of it. I hate being the only major contributor.) 1ForTheMoney (talk) 16:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense, thanks for the reply. Hopefully what I added is all information that an encyclopedia would want. I'm an editor over at the Wikia Hosted RuneScape wiki (under this same name) more than anywhere else, so I'm not exactly used to the style of writing expected for a good Wikipedia prose, but hopefully my edit can be kept and worked with. Anyways, thanks again for the response. :ɔ mol uɐɯ 16:17, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I just tried to make it shorter without losing relevant information - the general rule of thumb is to stick to what's mentioned in the sources and not ramble (on RSW you can get away with long explanations and minor details; on WP that would be frowned upon.) Really, though, you did the right thing by having a go and then asking for an explanation. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 16:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. There's one more news post regarding bonds where they expanded the membership options to include packages. I left it out because I didn't think it was notable enough, but maybe you have a different opinion. The update you can reference is here if you want to add it. If not, it doesn't really matter to me. mol uɐɯ 16:47, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You assume correctly. The concept of premier membership can't be unique to RuneScape plus it's only available for about one month. Besides, we already covered using bonds to buy membership and this is just a variation on that. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 16:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RuneScape game guide

(Completely unrelated to WP) Do you happen to know offhand how much of the old Knowledge Base was archived/where it could be found? Someone at RSW wants archives of the old Area guides it had. Chances are probably slim that you can help here, but it's worth asking. mol uɐɯ 14:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to refer you to this, but it happens to be missing the very pages you're looking for! Sorry about that. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 14:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Darn. Thanks anyways. I didn't think you'd be able to help because I didn't think there existed a page like that. Funny thing that page - Sigma borrowed it from Smithing who was already asked about these area archives. Small world, eh? mol uɐɯ 14:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RuneScape

So if I want to be listed as a major contributor to the article (I have relatively few edits, but an overqualified wealth of knowledge on the subject), would I just boldly add myself to that list? Or should I do as I have done and politely ask another major contributor if I can be listed amongst them? I'm interested in helping update the article and its sources, especially keeping it up to date on some of the major updates to come. mol uɐɯ —Preceding undated comment added 14:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No need to ask - just add yourself if you want to. The list is out-of-date, but I think people should add or remove themselves if they want to. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 14:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answer! Now, if I may ask another question: I'm having mixed feelings about writing about the Power to the Player Polls. I could probably fit it fluently under the Community section, but again, I'm feeling kinda meh. I'd like a second opinion on this. mol uɐɯ 14:44, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same feeling - the polls are mentioned very briefly under the Combat section, but since they now cover more of the game they'll probably have to be moved. There are many changes and missing features that could be added to the article, and at some point I need to write them all down. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 14:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Didn't you see I added that there? I was barely above borderline in adding that bit, actually. I figured it was valid enough considering the rest of the paragraph was about player involvement in the combat changes. To further clarify, the polls were actually originally (and still are) mostly pertaining to live game content, focusing only on the combat improvements a little. That link (which is the first source about the polls) actually predates the two links that follow it (which are just 2 examples for the polls' involvement in the combat rework). mol uɐɯ 14:59, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I knew it wasn't there yesterday. These legacy updates hold no interest for me. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 15:05, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Me neither. Also, about that edit you undid: Was the wording fine? Or should it remain simple? I felt the exact calculation might have been a bit too much, but I did it anyways because the formula is simple. I know you reverted it because forums shouldn't be cited. I ask because I suspect the formula will be explained again in a newspost eventually (which even if we decide to leave the wording alone, we can at least have a more up-to-date source). mol uɐɯ 15:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just never felt the exact calculation needed to be explained, even though it's fairly simple. The "old" formula was never officially released but players did eventually work it out and it was a lot more complex - you certainly couldn't put that in the article. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 15:18, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

regarding thumbnail

thank you for the feedback. but i would just like to bring to your kind notice that the thumbnail picture was already there when i started the edit. I also have a question you. How to save article when some other editor edits the article when one is working in it. I just lost 2 hours of editing as it just did not save? Please revert back waiting for your reply. Thank you. Araz5152 (talk) 16:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Moved to the bottom to keep everything in order.) First, I did nothing to the image except remove the thumb attribute, because thumbnails won't work properly in infoboxes. If you want to add an image with a caption, you use something like this:

{{Infobox person
...
|image      = Example.jpg
|image_size = 220 <!-- Default size for thumbnails/frameless images. Always include a fixed size,
even if you don't think you need it. -->
|caption    = Your caption
...
}}

Now for your second question. What you describe is called an edit conflict and they are very annoying. If you need time to make an edit, place {{in use}} at the top of the article before you start so other editors know the page is likely to be busy.

If an edit conflict does happen, you'll get a page with two boxes - the top box contains the current page, and the bottom box has the page you were working on. Copy anything you want to save from the bottom box to the top one, then click "Save page" to finish. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 16:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maps in info boxes

I'm having trouble getting this right. I've put in GPS coordinates, and city name, et. not sure what I'm doing wrong. Thanks. RufusL1948 21:12, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

I presume this is for B&O Railroad Headquarters Building? If so, I managed to get it working here, by changing the coordinate parameters to match those at {{infobox building}}. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 21:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On an unrelated note, your signature needs to link back to your user page, per WP:SIGLINK. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 21:33, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for getting the map to work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RufusL1948 (talk • contribs) 15:50, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RuneScape gameguide

We can't use the wiki to cite, but I found a small number of non-wiki game guide articles on the official site. It's really not much, but we can probably update some sources/nit pick these for important info. I'm not sure how much of the latter we could do though... Just thought I'd let ya know (assuming you didn't already). mol uɐɯ 14:30, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I knew of them, though the page you linked to is a little out of date (there are over 200M accounts, not 175M.) Other than that, I don't see an issue with using them as sources. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 15:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tank Carder

Hi, I signed in to Wikipedia to do some work on a friends page that someone else created because that is up for deletion. While I was here I uploaded the pictures on my son's page. Thank you for fixing his profile picture. I couldn't figure out how to do it. I also uploaded the other pictures and tried to place them in the sections they went to similar to Andy Dalton's page. Are you able to tell me how to do that or can you do it for me? Thank you so much!!! Mmcard59 (talk) 01:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It happens because the infobox is longer than the actual article and you've aligned all the images on the right, so the infobox pushes them down. The best way round it is to put the images in a gallery, like this.

I should also note that all the images could be deleted since they don't have enough copyright information. You need to fix that yourself. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 09:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis Lewin

Hi, me again. I'm trying to make Dennis Lewin's page more appealing to Wiki guidelines as it is up for deletion. Can you take a look at it and tell me what I can do to make it better so that it won't delete? He has been an icon for many many years and should have a wiki page. Thanks so much! Mmcard59 (talk) 01:22, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no good at this sort of thing, sorry. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 10:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for your help with Tank's page :) Mmcard59 (talk) 03:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Ogilvie on Jagex Article

You reverted my edit here - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jagex&diff=602698435&oldid=602694626 I put that Mark Ogilvie is the Design Director and Company Representative, and you reverted it because it didn't have a source. I actually Asked Mark Ogilvie in-game in RuneScape what his job is, and he said Design Director and Company Representative. I just didn't screenshot what he said, because at the time I didn't expect to be adding it to Wikipedia. But he said it, honest. I'm not lying. TimeSwimmer (talk) 11:18, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can believe that, but "I asked him" is not a reliable source according to Wikipedia policy. It needs to be something you can link to, like a list of staff credits or a news article (but not a forum post.) 1ForTheMoney (talk) 11:46, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Joe Allen edit I made today

Hi, I don't know if this is the place to do this, but I wanted to let you know that I know I messed up with the edit I made today. I was looking back through my account and noticed I'd edited his page before, and when I went back to see my edit, I didn't realise the entire page was from the day I edited it. I only updated his Liverpool appearances, and saved the page not noticing that it would have deleted all the edits since. I then tried to undo my edit, but for some reason it wouldn't let me! Anyway, thanks for sorting that out. I've been using Wikipedia for years but still have such a small grasp on editing it. -Matt 20:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acidulantes (talk • contribs)

Yes, I got the impression you'd taken it back to a much older version of the article, which struck me as weird considering your last edit was nearly 2 years ago. As for why you couldn't undo your edit, it's because the article is under pending changes protection - edits (including reversions) have to be approved by a reviewer before they actually appear in the article. It's used when you want to prevent vandalism, but still allow anonymous users to edit. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 21:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RuneScape

The screenshot of RuneScape was RuneScape 3, as edited by Bouowmx on 02:44, 19 October 2014‎. Please compare RuneScape 2 to RuneScape 3 on Google Images. I have reverted your change. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=RuneScape&diff=prev&oldid=637095313 Kirill2485 (talk) 08:36, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Sadly the interface isn't from RS3. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 08:59, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hudood Ordinances tag

re: the "needs attention from an expert in Pakistan. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article," tag added (actually changed from "expert" to "an expert in Pakistan") five years ago here.

I can't be called an "expert on Pakistan" but I have done some reading and research and have attempted to improve the article here.

Questions: As the initiator of the tag do you think the article still needs an expert? If so can you "Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article". --BoogaLouie (talk) 17:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't originate the tag, I just modified it. At the time, {{expert}} was deprecated in favour of {{expert-subject}} because the latter template allowed users to request help from specific WikiProjects, and I took it upon myself to clean out the remaining uses of {{expert}} according to my own judgement. I have no opinion on the article or its contents, sorry. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 19:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jagex

I can't put a ref as companies house doesn't give documents a static URL.

Information can be found here - https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/03982706/filing-history , and downloading the 'group of companies accounts'

It should still be possible to reference it, we just have to give clear directions to make sure people can find it. Something like <ref>Taken from the "Group of Companies Accounts" document dated 15 July 2015, listed on [https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/03982706/filing-history].</ref> will probably do it.

I'll think about how best to do it tomorrow evening when I have some free time, unless you want to jump right in. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 18:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	thanks for editing Wikipedia with good contribs Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:05, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Sadly real-life doesn't permit me to edit as much as I'd like. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 18:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, 1ForTheMoney. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Village/parish infoboxes

Thanks for adding infoboxes to Porton and Preshute.

Any reason why Template:Infobox UK place can't be used? Compare other Wiltshire parishes such as Potterne. Wire723 (talk) 14:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No reason, I'm just used to {{infobox settlement}}. I'll probably be moving on to topics other than settlements for the time being, though. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 15:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK fine. I'll update those two with the usual Wiltshire infobox when I get round to them. Wire723 (talk) 17:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, 1ForTheMoney. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 1ForTheMoney. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 1ForTheMoney. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]