Jump to content

User talk:199.60.104.18

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (199.60.104.18) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:31, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Drinking bird has been reverted.
Your edit here to Drinking bird was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rq3K6Ma0wIU) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:31, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Drinking bird. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~llywelyn 16:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llywelyn (talk • contribs) 16:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

[edit]

Your recent edit to the page Son of Vulcan with this edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk   20:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User_talk:TenOfAllTrades, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 01:40, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for multiple violations

[edit]

Your violations of our policies and rules here is getting very tiresome. I'm going to provide some links you need to read, and don't edit anymore until you have read them.

Read these links: WP:SPA, WP:TALK, WP:ADVOCACY, and WP:SOAP. -- Brangifer (talk) 18:17, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

[edit]
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abusing Wikipedia as an issue advocacy battleground. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Tznkai (talk) 00:40, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock the central library from wiki edit

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

199.60.104.18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(1)I agree not to post on thiomersal page. It's been open to edit for talk for a while and I have not posted there and this was even before the ban, this shows that I left it be. I have not posted on thiomersal controversy discussion page during the 72 hour ban, and I agree not to post there until dec 7. (2) I agree not to post in the thiomersal talk page (3)I served my 72 hour ban, should have ended. (4) Saying thiomersal is grandfathered in is not orginal research, as I keep reading it again in other webpages concerning thiomersal, and entered a discussion to see why that was, and it's important. (5) NO SECTION WAS CREATED IN WIKI ADMISTRATION BOARDS FOR THIS BAN. (6) I only did what I thought was right. (7) I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE CONDITIONS YOU SET.

Decline reason:

Responses to each of your points:

  1. Not editing an article during an edit war is a good start, however that's not the only issue that led to your blocking.
  2. So... you're agreeing to avoid the topic entirely? A self-imposed topic ban would help, however as an IP editor it's easily circumvented and we need to address the underlying issues of battleground mentality as well.
  3. No, you haven't... the block was placed 28 hours ago, and last I checked, 28 was less than 72.
  4. You need to provide sources that explicitly say this; Wikipedia reports what's already been printed, we don't draw up our own views from that information. I notice as well there have been some concerns about the sources you've been providing. Please be sure to double check the links to guidelines and policies that others have been giving to you.
  5. Doesn't matter, and caps lock don't help to make your point. Stop using them. A report at AN, ANI, or any other noticeboard is not necessary to issue a block, any uninvolved administrator may do so at their own discretion.
  6. And this is the root of the problem. Regardless of whether you think you're right, you must be willing to listen and accept the opinions of others. There often isn't a "right answer" when it comes to writing these articles, and treating these discussions as though there is one (and especially when you refuse to acknowledge that it may not be yours) leads to a breakdown in the discussion and prevents a consensus from being reached.
  7. Ok, then, conditions which you've agreed to in advance: continue to sit out your block(s) (this one expires at 12:25 AM on December 7, GMT), and in the meantime review the sourcing guidelines I mentioned as well as our policy on consensus. Also, and this is not a condition of unblocking, but merely a recommendation, you may wish to consider getting an account. This will remove the issue of multiple IP addresses entirely, and also make it easier for other editors to discuss issues with you. Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:38, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also I have access to several talk numbers so I can access wiki regardless of this ban, but I don't!!! Also the reason for my multi talk numbers is I don't have a computer and use what is available. I'm poor and my talk pid numbers are just a reflection of this. Thank you for your consideration.--199.60.104.18 (talk) 21:30, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced quotations

[edit]

Please stop doing this sort of thing: [1], [2], [3].

Instead of starting a post off with "Quote:" and then including a string of text that you pulled off of some random web site, please do some research first. At a minimum, verify that the source you're quoting is reliable by Wikipedia's standards (please also check the guidelines for reliable sources for medical information) and include an accurate description of who or what it is that you're quoting. If you don't know or can't find out where a quote originated, that's a very good sign that it's not appropriate for inclusion or reference in an encyclopedia article.

Wikipedia talk pages, despite their name, are not intended to be general discussion or chat forums for conspiracy theories related to a particular topic. Don't post to a talk page unless you have specific proposals for improving an article. It's not appropriate to ask other members of the project to do all your work for you. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 05:04, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TenofAlltrades you said the Toronto story is false, yet when asked for your source you have none. I source stuff, nevertheless you say it's not sourced. I suggest stuff to improve the article, nevertheless you say not. Your behavior is edit warring and is constant. You never talk about the specifics. MastCell does; he addresses the issues presented; maybe, you should learn from him.

You write to ban and place your rant about not sourcing to mislead other editors there is a problem. I provide specific proposals you ignore and retort that I have not provided specific proposals. Again you claim the Toronto story is false. Well why did you say that, if it is you would think YOUR SIDE would have said it was false long ago. It's a scoop if it is, so I look forward to you disproving this fact. You claim I did not source it, yet I provided over 2000 links of folks saying it's true, yet you provide ZERO links. Different search words can produce tens of thousands of google sites that repeat this, and you only have to come up with one fringe site that says it's false, yet you make an excuses why you won't show a third party reference, fringe or not, that it's false, yet you post it's false. --199.60.104.18 (talk) 17:41, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't ever blank a section from another editor's talk page again. Falsely accusing me of edit warring is no way to apologise. Continuing to accuse me of things I haven't done isn't helpful, nor is your continued practice of posting unsourced quotations on the thiomersal controversy talk page: [4]. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 00:25, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/the ministry of casual living. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> The Book of Chzz, Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

{{reflist}}

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 00:17, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Shearonink (talk) 05:19, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Calstock, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 21:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Michaëlle Jean seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Artists and Models. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:53, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your article submission the ministry of casual living

[edit]

Hello 199.60.104.18. It has now been over a year since you last edited your article submission, entitled the ministry of casual living.

If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/the ministry of casual living}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:21, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Pumaman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Vadinho then gives Tony a magical golden belt that when worn gives him amazing [[superpowers (ability|superpowers]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of steel producers may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |World total (2012 is 807.1 so who is producing the other 48% of 1,548?

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:09, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Serge LeClerc, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geoff Who, me? 17:51, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Serge LeClerc. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Wolfrock (talk) 23:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Quantitative easing

[edit]

I moved your comment to the article's talk page and responded there. The discussion is relevant to the article, so I thought it should go someplace where everyone interested in the article can read it. Thanks for writing! Lagrange613 01:56, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lloyd Duhaime concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lloyd Duhaime, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lloyd Duhaime

[edit]

Hello 199.60.104.18. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Lloyd Duhaime".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lloyd Duhaime}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Creature from the Haunted Sea— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

[edit]

Please do not continue to make nonconstructive edits to Captain Marvel (M.F. Enterprises). You are introducing copy-edit errors, fancruft, uncited claims and nonencyclopedic WP:TONE. Please take your concerns to the article's talk page. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Sb2001. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Big Bad Beetleborgs— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sb2001 talk page 23:32, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to 9/11 Truth movement— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 17:30, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 9/11 Truth movement. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 17:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Metaloaf (talk) 17:43, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Baden-Paul. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ashlee Simpson— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Baden-Paul (talk) 03:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mighty Man and Yukk has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sinbad Jr. and his Magic Belt, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:03, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in How to Kill 400 Duponts, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. →Emɑdix © 00:11, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to United States Navy—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:199.60.104.18&oldid=1142810162"