User talk:199.191.109.199
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks. |
---|
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it. |
May 2011[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Domo (NHK), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Buzz-tardis (talk) 21:32, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
November 2011[edit]
February 2012[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at German resistance. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. jonkerz ♠talk 15:58, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at German resistance, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator talk 15:59, 17 February 2012 (UTC) This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to German resistance. RA0808 talkcontribs 16:04, 17 February 2012 (UTC) February 2012[edit]
April 2012[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Leighton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Liam987 13:42, 2 April 2012 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Jeff Carter, you may be blocked from editing. Liam987 13:44, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:44, 11 May 2012 (UTC) Hello.[edit]
Boo![edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
199.191.109.199 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Please just accept or I'll get you. I hardly sockpuppeted when I got back just today. Accept or get off my talk. Decline reason: If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
199.191.109.199 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Sorry. Please just accept this time. I am tired of being in this prison of misery. Decline reason: I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Please stop making frivolous unblock requests, or you will be blocked from editing this page as well. An optimist on the run! 17:24, 30 May 2012 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Note[edit]Please note that you may not remove declined unblock requests while you are still blocked. TNXMan 16:02, 30 May 2012 (UTC) Just please unblock me! Or I'll have to ask Nyttend to block you.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
199.191.109.199 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: You aren't helping!I need to be unblocked! I have something for you to fix if you do!It is this:got back just today. Accept or get off my talk. Decline reason: Talk page access revoked now for repeated threats. Goodbye, Adios, Sayonara, Dos vedanya, Au revoir, Arrivederci. Elockid (Talk) 18:05, 30 May 2012 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. September 2012[edit]Hello, I'm Braincricket. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Connecticut Colony because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Braincricket (talk) 12:46, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
October 2012[edit]Hello, I'm Anbu121. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to La Llorona, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Anbu121 (talk me) 13:06, 12 October 2012 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at La Llorona with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Anbu121 (talk me) 13:10, 12 October 2012 (UTC)Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Hopsin, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC) May 2013[edit]Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Samuel Pepys, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Yintan 12:49, 1 May 2013 (UTC) To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here. --Vsmith (talk) 13:48, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled. If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation. December 2017[edit]Hello, I'm Flami72. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Evita (musical) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flami72 (talk) 14:33, 21 December 2017 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Evita (musical). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Septrillion (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
April 2018[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Results of the War of 1812. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TwoTwoHello (talk) 12:56, 5 April 2018 (UTC) Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to 1805 in the United States— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 17:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC) I thought this IP address was blocked by Elockid along with all of these crazy sockpuppets created by Aii? Why and how in the world did you ever get unblocked October 2021[edit]Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cincinnati Bengals—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cincinnati Bengals, you may be blocked from editing. Lenny Marks (talk) 16:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
April 2022[edit]Hello, I'm Notcharizard. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Universal's Epic Universe, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- ☽☆ NotCharizard (talk) 13:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
September 2022[edit]Hello, I'm Lol1VNIO. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Fundamental Orders of Connecticut—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 16:19, 15 September 2022 (UTC) October 2022[edit]Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Gloucester, New Jersey seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC) Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Gloucester City, New Jersey. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC) October 2023[edit]Hello, I'm Koshchki123. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of Gloucester (1777) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Koshchki123 (she/they) (talk) 12:30, 12 October 2023 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
|
February 2024
[edit]Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Walter White (NAACP), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 19:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Walter White (NAACP), you may be blocked from editing. Endersslay (talk) 19:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |