User talk:1952unionman1952
1952unionman1952, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi 1952unionman1952! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC) |
November 2020
[edit]In this edit you have referenced another of your own (or your family's) self-published works. This is not funny any longer. A return to SPI and/or ANI is next. Stop using Wikipedia as a vehicle for promotion of your own works. And stop editing articles with which you have an association. And stop abusing multiple accounts to do these things. It is clear that your goals (and the means by which you are seeking to achieve those goals) are incompatible with the goals of the project. Either work within the norms of the project. Or find something else to do with your time (and everyone elses' time). Guliolopez (talk) 13:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- Any more edits from this user, and SPI will be next. Spleodrach (talk) 08:23, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Orphaned non-free image File:Tim Quill 1927 portrait.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Tim Quill 1927 portrait.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Unblock
[edit]- Is Generalrelee123 (talk · contribs) your account? SQLQuery me! 08:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- What about these?
- Spongebob20501 (talk · contribs)
- Scumbag1234 (talk · contribs)
- Spoderman2469 (talk · contribs)
- Continuing to create new accounts to evade your block does not seem to me like the behavior of someone that is aware of the term 'sock puppet' and understands what it is. I will leave this request to another admin / checkuser. SQLQuery me! 09:00, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
1952unionman1952 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I would like to request a conditional unblock for the purposes of expanding specific biographies based on a history book that was published recently. I am aware now of the term ‘sock puppet’ and understand what it is. Please see my edits of the following biographies linked below. These articles were formerly stubs and I believe that the edits I have made were constructive. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Hickey_(Irish_politician)&oldid=1023502244 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timothy_Quill&oldid=1023505000 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timothy_J._Murphy&oldid=1023500091 1952unionman1952 (talk) 07:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No. Your best bet is to go six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO with your original account. As you continued violating WP:SOCK after you clearly knew about the policy, so far all you've done is demonstrate you haven't the slightest intention of following our policies. Yamla (talk) 10:29, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.