User talk:194.80.246.1

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 194.80.246.1, is registered to Learning Resources Centre, University of Surrey Roehampton, London, UK and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

l

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hairspray (musical), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.JeanColumbia (talk) 19:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Domestic sheep. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. noq (talk) 13:46, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Sir Roger Manwood's School. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 21:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sandwich Technology School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 21:18, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Craig Bellamy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 14:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to University of Lagos, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Amsaim (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Southlands College has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/profile.php?id=509589108&ref=ts (matching the regex rule \bfacebook\.com).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:35, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mathew Quinn, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mathew Quinn was changed by 194.80.246.1 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-03-28T21:39:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:25, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at xenobiotic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tim Vickers (talk) 18:15, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article University of Lagos, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 14:03, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Stephen Chow has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 20:24, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Patience has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 12:23, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Nigeria, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Also vandalized Ideology Letter (alphabet) Chacarron Macarron Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:20, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kathy Bates, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 18:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Grandfather paradox has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. WAYNEOLAJUWON 22:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Roehampton University constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 15:47, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Luc Devereaux

Hello 194.80.246.1. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Luc Devereaux, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: article could do with improvement, but a major character in a major movie series is quite likely notable. Thank you. Ϣere SpielChequers 19:45, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Border Campaign (Irish Republican Army). Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dl2000 (talk) 03:30, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

mass edit war/vendetta with O fenian

please explain why you are reverting O fenian on every article he has editted today? please cease before you get into any more edit wars.--Lerdthenerd wiki defender 17:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why haven't you posted this message on his talk page? He reverted many of my edits first. 194.80.246.1 (talk) 17:55, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I did not. Those were not reverts. O Fenian (talk) 17:56, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule at Northcliffe Media. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 18:11, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Ckatz^chat _spy 10:17, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ckatz^chat _spy 20:47, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try reading the articles talk page dipshit. 194.80.246.1 (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Joel Smith (murderer), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Jujutacular ^talk 02:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Curtis Warren. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Jujutacular ^talk 02:43, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Joel Smith (murderer), you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Jujutacular ^talk 02:45, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Curtis Warren, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Jujutacular ^talk 02:46, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should read your talk page, and learn what vandalism is. 194.80.246.1 (talk) 02:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

I have blocked this IP address mostly for technical disruption due to edit warring. "Drug dealer" is a much more common expression than "drugs dealer", whatever spelling you use. Please examine Encyclopaedia Britannica, Google Books, or just BBC articles linked in the pages you edited. The book which you referred to was published first with "drugs baron" in the title, and then reprinted by the same publisher with "drug baron"; the wikipedia article was linked to the second version. Materialscientist (talk) 04:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are a fool. Whichever spelling is more 'common' is irrelevant, only one is correct. 194.80.246.1 (talk) 10:11, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Outcasts (TV series) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. TheSuave 13:44, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Outcasts (TV series) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 15:55, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at December 11 ‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 20:47, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to the page Talk:Halo: Combat Evolved, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 07:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Talk:Halo: Combat Evolved. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 07:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Halo: Combat Evolved, you may be blocked from editing. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 07:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Halo: Combat Evolved, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 07:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alison ^❤ 07:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sweat equity, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you! -- West.andrew.g (talk) 20:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sloth

The article seems to be written in US English rather than UK. Why do you revert, why call it vandalism? Materialscientist (talk) 05:38, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

The recent edit you made to English languages constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Harry (talk) 18:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to User talk:194.80.246.1, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 10:50, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:194.80.246.1. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Pichpich (talk) 16:22, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ente Ammu Ninte Thulasi Avarude Chakki with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Carmichael95 [TALK] | [CONTRIBS] 15:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gizmondo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pichpich (talk) 15:50, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for vandalism and disruptive editing. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact the unblock mailing list at unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org. _Macbookair 3140 19:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:194.80.246.1, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pichpich (talk) 17:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cooties, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator ^talk 16:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Candy (Robbie Williams song) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 09:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Banana Republic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Widr (talk) 12:58, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Theory of multiple intelligences, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:28, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Live While We're Young, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Widr (talk) 14:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at One Thing (One Direction song), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 14:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at One Thing (One Direction song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denisarona (talk) 14:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. James086 ^Talk 15:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Inspector George Gently. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. Reify-tech (talk) 14:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2014

Hello, I'm DavidLeighEllis. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Volvic (mineral water) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DavidLeighEllis (talk) 20:10, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Limassol, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katieh5584 (talk) 19:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fulham F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 14:10, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tim Sherwood with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Lugia2453 (talk) 15:24, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of edit to List of United States presidential elections in which the winner lost the popular vote

Please discuss your proposed change on Talk:List of United States presidential elections in which the winner lost the popular vote. There appears to be notable discussion in the media about this, & this material has been in the article for a while. I am not saying that it should remain, but I am saying that you should adhere to the Wikipedia consensus policy before removing it. Peaceray (talk) 17:12, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm Tessaract2. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Not Funny have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tessaract2^Talk 14:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Commonwealth of Nations, you may be blocked from editing. MilborneOne (talk) 22:43, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 172.58.40.173 (talk) 23:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.