User talk:193.62.214.1

Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 193.62.214.1, is registered to Victoria & Albert Museum and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Gielgud

Thank you for your feedback on John Gielgud. I have added info on the bequests from his estate and archive, much of which is with the British Library. If you wish to regularly edit, I'd suggest registering an account with Wikipedia as there has been vandalism associated with this IP address. If you have any questions please ask on my talk page. Thanks and best wishes Span (talk) 12:24, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm Oddbodz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Tashkent clan, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Oddbodz (talk) 23:32, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victoria Broackes (May 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Victoria Broackes.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AmaryllisGardener ^talk 15:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tibor Reich

I reverted your edit to Tibor Reich because the article is still written like an advert, and the principal author still appears to someone with a conflict of interest. These content tags are important because they draw attention of editors who can correct the deficiencies. Removing them will only get the article deleted. —teb728 t c 08:25, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Broackes

I modified your draft article on Victoria Broackes. You had placed the real references after the reflist, which meant that they were not displayed. I moved them inline in the body of the article.

Before you resubmit the article for review, you need to improve the references: Too many of them are to the V&A; so they are not the kind of independent sources that Wikipedia wants. And most of them do not even mention Ms. Broackes's association with the project.

I hope this helps. —teb728 t c 08:36, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Victoria Broackes concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Victoria Broackes, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Victoria Broackes

Hello 193.62.214.1. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Victoria Broackes".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Victoria Broackes}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 20:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Victoria Broackes concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Victoria Broackes, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Victoria Broackes

Hello, 193.62.214.1. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Victoria Broackes".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:50, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.