Jump to content

User talk:192.91.171.42

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

June 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to AM-630, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Yunshui  09:53, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at AM-630. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Yunshui  09:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tun Tavern. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Vertium When all is said and done 12:23, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2012

[edit]

Please stop introducing jokes into articles, such as those you created at Bank holiday. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to you being blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 01:37, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right-wing authoritarianism

[edit]

Could you please explain your edit to this article at Talk:Right-wing authoritarianism#Description. TFD (talk) 11:50, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. Your recent edit to the page Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:09, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 192.91.171.42. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Peter William Eric Hegre IV".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peter William Eric Hegre IV}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 01:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Winner 42. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manspreading— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me! 20:57, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Gordon Keith (radio host) with this edit. Thank you. Geoff Who, me? 20:39, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to USS Bergall (SSN-667)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 11:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 0th. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ScrpIronIV 19:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to 0th. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ScrpIronIV 20:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 0th. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ScrpIronIV 20:05, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit at 0th. - DVdm (talk) 07:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: https://answers.yahoo.com is not a reliable source. See wp:reliable sources. - DVdm (talk) 07:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: Blocked

[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Materialscientist (talk) 16:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to Trinity High School (Euless, Texas) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 22:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]