User talk:173.195.200.89

December 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Garde, Spain has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Garde, Spain was changed by 173.195.200.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873772 on 2019-12-03T02:22:56+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Garde, Spain. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Everedux ^(talk) 02:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Çepan, you may be blocked from editing. Paleontologist99 (talk) 02:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Microdrive. – Frood (talk) 02:40, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 05:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Warnings

Please do not remove warning from your talk page. They must be permanently present in order to keep your editing record. Paleontologist99 (talk) 16:47, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Hummerrocket. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Grammar—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Hummerrocket (talk) 21:44, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bit nibbler. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bit nibbler was changed by 173.195.200.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958009 on 2019-12-08T21:56:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:56, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, I'm Everedux. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Pax—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Everedux ^(talk) 02:35, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Millard Fillmore. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Everedux ^(talk) 02:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gravball (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gravball and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gravball, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:40, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 173.195.200.89! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:40, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Lord William—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Qzd (talk) 01:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Japanese carpentry has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Japanese carpentry was changed by 173.195.200.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882497 on 2020-04-05T16:12:42+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:12, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gravball

Hello, 173.195.200.89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gravball".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm 3PPYB6. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ernest Hemingway House—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 00:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ernest Hemingway House. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 00:38, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ernest Hemingway House, you may be blocked from editing. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 00:40, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ernest Hemingway House. You appear to be doing this on purpose. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 00:42, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Lake Chad, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Dialmayo (talk) (Contribs) she/her 14:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lake Chad (Antarctica), you may be blocked from editing. Tails Wx 14:08, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--Vsmith (talk) 14:12, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.195.200.89 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did nothing wrong and you're kinda cringe for blocking me tbh 173.195.200.89 (talk) 14:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nonsense. Yamla (talk) 14:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 15:42, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.