User talk:172/archive 20

saddam

no offense, but if you look at the after of your edit, it looks pretty screwed up. Change the titles themselves, one by one and not one large (and slightly strange) revert. Also, i strongly feel that the image caption is perfectly encyclopedic the way i have it. This is a new year, and i really don't want to fight. Happy New Year. dposse 05:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then how exactly did we get two "youth" sections after your revert? How was half of the infomation missing from the article? It may be my tired eyes, but that's what i saw. I'll make your edits, although i'd feel more comfortable if we discussed it on the talk page first. dposse 05:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i did your edits. Anything else? dposse 05:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2004 habermas.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:2004 habermas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 19:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

File:1953 S Novym Godom.jpg

Happy New Year! (Ukrainian: З Новим Роком!, Russian: С Новым Годом!). I wish you in 2007 to be spared of the real life troubles so that you will continue to care about Wikipedia. We will all make it a better encyclopedia! I also wish things here run smoothly enough to have our involvement in Wikipedia space at minimum, so that we can spend more time at Main. --Irpen

Image tagging for Image:GaidarandBush.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:GaidarandBush.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced

Would you be kind enough to inform me what you mean by reverting my link to the arms to Iraq page? In your motivation you insist that it is unsourced, which would seem to be wrong since it I've linked to the page where the quotation comes from. I'm also interested in what periods you want me to divide the figures in? As a tentative suggestion I could calculate the values for the periods 1973-1979, 1980-1982, 1983-1988. Prezen 21:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Iraqi insurgents celebrate while riding through the streets of Falluja, May 1, 2004.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Iraqi insurgents celebrate while riding through the streets of Falluja, May 1, 2004.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — BigDT 03:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sadrprotest.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sadrprotest.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — BigDT 04:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sadr.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sadr.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — BigDT 04:02, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kennan1990.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kennan1990.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 13:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image was mistakenly deleted I have restored it, but please provide the rationale ASAP Alex Bakharev 05:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I already added the rationale as well as I could. Please revise if necessary. Also, the image has been submitted for deletion as some here have nothing better to do, I guess. You may want to express your opinion at the IfD vote. --Irpen 07:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting Death Toll of Communism

If you are going to redirect this article, could you at least redirect it to a page that deals specifically with the death toll of communism, instead of the generic criticisms of communism page?

Image:Kennan1990.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kennan1990.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — BigDT 06:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Oct93_1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Oct93_1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:44, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please help ...

With a comment here: [1] and also, if you know some good classic sources, if you can provide any to the paragraph in question here, at the bottom: [2]. Thanks, Slrubenstein | Talk 14:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ivory Coast move

Since you participated in previous discussions on Ivory Coast, you might be interested in the requested move at Talk:Côte_d'Ivoire#...Requested_move. — AjaxSmack 08:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:POINT violation report

Thank you 172, I'll have a look. --Guinnog 02:55, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've warned the user you had an issue with. I have also reverted the article to the way it was before their latest posts. Please let me know if you need any further help. Best wishes, --Guinnog 03:15, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WP:POINT on socialism

Ditto! I think EnglishEfternamn is beginning to get the idea that editors are not going to tolerate his nonsense. If he continues to cause disruptions, however, I agree that he will have to be blocked, and it looks like Guinnog will take care of that if necessary. By the way, your explanation of recent events was wonderfully precise and accurate—and the compliment is much appreciated. :-) -- WGee 04:55, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[3]

Per [4], I think you meant to file a new rfcu request. I reverted your change, as you made it to the wrong page. -Patstuart^talk|edits 05:12, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Omali Yeshitela

Nice copy-edits. --Uncle Ed 17:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hussein RFC

Thank you for restoring the Rfc section. I will be closing it in a few days anyway, and it can be archived after that. Caper13 23:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Award

		Tireless Contributor Barnstar Award
		I Hpfan9374, hereby award you with the Tireless Contributor Barnstar Award, for contributing an especially large body of work without sacrificing quality. Hpfan9374 08:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Communism

Hi 172, thanks for your note. I don't wish to get re-involved with anything to do with communism at Wikipedia - the task of dealing with the CPW is hopeless under the current structure. That's why as soon as Larry Sanger's new project Citizendium gets going, I will probably leave Wikipedia altogether. Sadly, you will not be able to follow me there since editors are required to edit under their real names. Adam 05:26, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saddam Hussein image

Hello,

no problem about your image, as far as I'm concerned. I had been trying for two days to find a suitable image for Saddam Hussein (I even included the one you used), only to be continually reverted and told about the rules of "free/fair use/whatever images". I had found a public domain image, but your is admittedly better, so if you're positive that it fits the wikipedia rules, no problem for me. I was just trying to replace the "bearded Saddam" picture, which I found unsuitable for the top box. I'll probably post mine somewhere else on the article. :) Max Thayer 07:58, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template: Communism

You deleted "Juche" on the grounds that you don't know for any major encyclopedia or sourcebook which uses that term in its entry on Communism. Do "Left communism", "Council communism" and "Anarchist communism" satisfy that criteria? -- Vision Thing -- 19:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there should be clear criteria for inclusion. If "Juche" is excluded those three should be excluded too, or the template becomes too unbalanced. -- Vision Thing -- 12:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to this, it did have some international influence. -- Vision Thing -- 12:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a sockpuppet

I was reviewing my prior edits, and noticed that you had deleted my vote on Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_June_30 because you claimed I was a sockpuppet, yet you couldn't even have the decency to alert me on my Talk page or ask me who I am and why I made my vote. Where is it written that I must make edits to Wikipedia every day to not be a sockpuppet? At least have the decency to give people a chance to defend themselves. Sachmet 18:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regimes and forms of government

Hi 172. Indeed I am interested in the subject of semidemocratic regimes and democratic transitions. I must confess, however, that I'm layman on these issues; my field of study at university was economics (though I did do a course on Political systems of the Third World, which focussed mostly on Islamic countries though). Still, if you can recommend some lecture, I would be very glad. Luis rib 00:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Knox.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Knox.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EnglishEfternamn and WP:POINT

Hi 172. I finally got around to reporting EnglishEfternamn to the administrators' noticeboard [5]. Feel free to add evidence of his disruptions at the Soviet Union article if you have the time. -- WGee 01:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I just finished my exams and have more time on my hands. By the way, this is a joke: they're just being deliberately ignorant. -- WGee 17:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! And bravo to Pschemp for having the common sense to block this pest. -- WGee 19:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neoliberalism

Bravo! Thanks for cutting through the bullshit. Apparently more moderate reverts, which I have tried a few times, did not help - Now we need to look out for re-reverts -- there's a lot of nutjobs out there ... --Thorsen 07:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

83.229.21.4

No problem. Since it's an open proxy, it can be used any anyone. However I noticed it's been used by SummerThunder (talk · contribs) on January 1, so he could be responsible for some of the other edits as well. See also: Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of SummerThunder. The IP was blocked due to ST's block evasion (also see SummerThunder's block log, you'll notice that Samuel Blanning block him indef). The person who stalked you could be him, as he's stalked me before as well. Khoi khoi 16:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:RJII

I was not aware of the ArbCom decision. When I took a look, it appeared that the account was blocked solely because it was a shared account. Based on this, I unblocked All Male Action. It appears that this was the initial block but that the ArbCom decision later modified this. My apologies, thanks to everyone who spoke up. --Yamla 18:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template

I just looked over the template, and yikes what a freaking mess. I dont know how much help I could be coming in so late, but I will see if I have anything useful to contribute. Later. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 15:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:SaddamCuellar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SaddamCuellar.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The disputed sentence

Hi. About your edit on Socialism, I don't understand why "direct—exercised" and "indirect—exercised" are being used as verbs. Please also note that since there's a disagreement about the paragraphs, it's best not to mark such edits as minor. Xiner (talk, email) 02:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Saddam Hussein portrait.jpg

This image does not have adequate source information as it has been deleted from the Commons. It has already been deleted deleted here before as well. It will likely be impossible to prove who the source is, so please do not add it to articles where a clearer free-use image is already in place. --tomf688 (talk - email) 03:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalism and Scott refs

In the history of the article Capitalism you assert the importance of references to Scott. " 09:31, 16 February 2007 172 (Talk | contribs) (rv nonsense by RJII/ICWT. The removal of the citation of Scott on grounds that there is no page number borders on vandalism. The source is an Oxford dictionary. Entries are alphabetical.)" Could you make the "(Scott 2005)" notations into reflist footnotes indicating what article in A Dictionary of Sociology is being referenced? For example, "(Scott 2005)" occurs in the sentence: "Mercantilism was a system of trade for profit, although commodities were still largely produced by non-capitalist production methods (Scott 2005)." Is the reference to the article on "Mercantilism", or "production methods" or "non-capitalist production methods"? I am making the request so that notes in the article are uniform and of maximum utility, regardless of the level of understanding of the user. --Bejnar 17:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scott refs

I also note that Scott is a tertiary reference source. Tertiary sources are fine for some material, and I do regard Scott as essentially reliable, but would some of the citations that are currently to Scott be better, i.e. more useful, if they were to a secondary source instead? --Bejnar 17:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Communism sidebar

Please do not ignore the consensus built on the template discussion page to revert to your preferred version. If you disagree with the views expressed there, please engage in the ongoing discussion. Warofdreams talk 03:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Brezhnev.jpg

This image that you have uploaded (quite a long time ago) was tagged incorrectly as Public Domain. This is not so. I have tagged it with {{wrong license}} and left a note on the talk page.--Konstable 22:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meditation

If you are interested in meditation please say so. -- Vision Thing -- 12:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Template:PD-Gov

An image that you uploaded or altered, Template:PD-Gov, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Iamunknown 05:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of dictators, again

I thought you might be interested to see that there's some rumblings at Talk:List of dictators that the page should be resurrected. The good point has been made that the deletion that occurred a couple of months ago took place without any actual consensus to delete. Nonetheless, I think resurrection would be a bad idea. Anyway, just thought you'd be interested. john k 20:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another possible sockpuppet

I have recently noticed the activities of User:Billy Ego. He claims to be a fascist, but follows the same editing pattern of claiming that fascism is socialist that has been characteristic of RJII in the past. Significantly, he quotes libertarian sources to support his arguments. He also resurrected a long-dead userbox that no new user could possibly have known about. -- Nikodemos 02:35, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is the procedure for exposing a sockpuppet, other than a request for checkuser? I'm afraid I have no experience with this sort of thing, but you have exposed several RJII socks before, so I would greatly appreciate your help. Billy Ego is using some of RJII's well-known intimidation and harassment tactics to avoid discussion of his edits. -- Nikodemos 01:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know

I removed a news report you had posted here Talk:Robert Mugabe#Deletion of well source material about succession intention for copyright reasons Nil Einne 08:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JohnH.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JohnH.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured article review/History of Poland (1945–1989)

Since you voted during FAC and you are familiar with the region/period, perhaps you'd like to comment and/or help improve the article?--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 16:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Party (politics)

Also I thought you'd be interested in this stub.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 20:04, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:PD-Gov

Template:PD-Gov has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Iamunknown 04:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brezhnev Doctrine

If interested, please take a look/help develop this pity stub. Thanks, -Irpen 02:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

[6] > why do you say this picture is irrelevant? It was included in a section untitled "Criticism of and opposition to Mugabe" so it's not irrelevant to show a demonstration against him. It's totally neutral to show a demonstration. It would have been irrelevant if it was written something like "fair demonstration against Mugabe's crimes" under it but it wasn't. Moreover, there aren't many pictures in this article so I think such a picture was welcomed. So I am asking you better arguments/explanations before I ask other people's opinion. Regards. --Two Wings (jraf ) 16:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saddam Screenshot

I don't understand why you deleted the MSNBC screenshot of the day Saddam was hanged. Your comment that it was "amateurish" gives me the impression it was faked/photoshopped. This was most certainly not the case... I have grabbed several screenshots of that day; I can replace wit another if you'd like. Screenshots are OK to use in Wikipedia, are they not?

Rafael Correa

I'm grateful for some of the changes you made on the article, however, I think some of the deletions were not necessary. I started a discussion on the talk page, and would greatly appreciate your input. Thanks, Sjmcfarland 19:56, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Nehru(nam).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nehru(nam).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cold War

While your edits to the refs were good, I dispute your removal of the 1st/2nd/3rd World map and Continuing implications... section. The first presents an instructive overview of terms that were common in Cold War debates. The second also contains very useful summary information (Roy's data) that if poorly written about can be improved, not blanked. 63.98.135.196 15:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1993 Russian constitutional crisis

1993 Russian constitutional crisis has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. LuciferMorgan 20:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of Israeli apartheid

I have started a deletion debate on a topic which might interest you. See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid (fifth nomination).-- Zleitzen^(talk) 17:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TFD of Template:PD-Old regime Iraq

I have TFD'd as I believe it takes a wrong-headed approach to copyright and may be frankly inaccurate. Kotepho 09:07, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cold War

If you find something in the text disagreeable could you delete whatever it is you don't like instead of reverting to much earlier edits. The two times you've done this you've also reverted my working the parenthetical citations into footnotes, and that took some time. Thanks. SpiderMMB 02:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Time of Troubles

As a professional historian, your input on this short article is highly appreciated: it uses 1911 EB and 19th century sources to claim 'massacres' and such; I think it justifies the tag that indicate problems with reliability and neutrality, but some users claim 'those sources are fully reliable' and the article needs no more updating nor references.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 17:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Russian-Circassian War

Hey, I noticed your interests on your user page and wondered if you would be interested in taking a look at the above article? It's main problem is a lack of printed sources, but I have solved that after coming accross a couple of books on the conflict and am in the slow process of working the article over adding references and information from them. However I would still appreciate another opinion! Cheers SGGH 10:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cold War Introduction Picture

I think the introduction text looks noticeably naked compared to similar articles. I understand your concern about the maps, but how about an infobox which is similar to those used in other war articles such as World War II and Vietnam war? I dug this one out of the archives: SpiderMMB 19:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, as you seem to have had a large hand in what I consider a well-written article, there is no reason for me to go through five pages of archives before submitting a suggestion. I could just as easily have added the infobox without asking you, but I asked out of consideration.

There's no reason for you to "rewrite" your "previously long postings." Your succint statement was easy enough to understand. But I would suggest you try to understand when someone is trying to be cooperative and not difficult. SpiderMMB 00:49, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, and I appreciate the reply. SpiderMMB 10:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re:revert

Sorry about the revert to Boris Yeltsin, didn't read the last edit summary and all I saw was a big chunk of blanking and assumed vandalism! --Samtheboy ^(t/c) 09:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of International reactions to the death of Boris Yeltsin

An editor has nominated International reactions to the death of Boris Yeltsin, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International reactions to the death of Boris Yeltsin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New editor

Thanks for the note. He certainly does bear watching. -Will Beback · † · 20:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto, thanks. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 23:32, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My condolences

Saudis Arrest 172 in Alleged Terror Plot

Socialism

Hi 172. The recent changes to the socialism article are worrying, and my attempts to keep things sane are being undone by several editors. An objective voice would be helpful amidst all this instability, so, if you have time, check things out. -- WGee 04:52, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DengMitterrand.jpg

Hello, 172. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:DengMitterrand.jpg) was found at the following location: User:172/Socialism. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dien Bien Phu.jpg

Hello, 172. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Dien Bien Phu.jpg) was found at the following location: User:172/Cold War draft. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Journey to the Soviet Union.png

Hello, 172. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Journey to the Soviet Union.png) was found at the following location: User:172/Cold War draft. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 15:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sharecropperhouse.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sharecropperhouse.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Yonatan ^talk 02:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

annexation

Could you please help resolving a dispute wrt to annexation article. This edit illustrates part of it. Thanks in advance, --Irpen 05:25, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Li Peng.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Li Peng.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Sergei Ivanov.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sergei Ivanov.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Unspecified source for Image:Hung-wu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hung-wu.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -SCEhard T 02:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:PD-Old regime Iraq

Template:PD-Old regime Iraq has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 13:59, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Oct93_1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Oct93_1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 23:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gaidar_and_Yeltsin.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gaidar_and_Yeltsin.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 23:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance drafts ready for editing/comments

Hi,

Father Goose and I (WikiLen) have developed competing versions for a possible guideline on relevancy. I note you have previous participated at this project. Your contributions would be timely now.

Draft ~~REL2~~ REL2.1 by Father Goose
Draft REL3 by WikiLen

My draft is the current proposed guideline only because I made mine after Father Goose did his. This is not to suggest either version is favored. Thanks for your interest... —WikiLen 03:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAR on History of Russia

History of Russia has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.

Colchicum 17:03, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Call for editor participation at Relevance

Hi 172,

Wikipedia:Relevance requests your presence — see, "Call for editor participation" at the talk page. —WikiLen 17:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Slovo-joe.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Slovo-joe.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 14:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Iraq,_Saddam_Hussein_(222).jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Iraq,_Saddam_Hussein_(222).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Abu badali ^(talk) 16:03, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cold WarWikiProject

Cool! That's a great image! Chris 21:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:AlBakr.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AlBakr.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:57, 3 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 17:57, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:MurphySaddam.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:MurphySaddam.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:57, 3 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 17:57, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Saddam1990.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Saddam1990.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 17:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:SaddamBaghdadwalkabout.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SaddamBaghdadwalkabout.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:59, 3 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 17:59, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image sources

Hi, 172. Please, make sure you add verifiable source information to the images you upload. That is, you should no only name the image's source, but also make it in such a way to allow other to verify that the information is correct, just as to verify the licensing status. Best regards, --Abu badali ^(talk) 18:01, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Saddam Hussein on his throne.jpg

Hi. You wrote in your Edit Summary for this edit "/* Secular leadership*/ rm image not taken during the period being described under the heading". So, when was it taken, can we put the image in that section? Thanks! — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 17:59, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AlBakr.jpg license is questioned

Hey, 172, edit the license at Image:AlBakr.jpg so that the source, etc. is clarified. WhisperToMe 20:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of Category:Allied occupation of Europe

Hello, 172. I've just posted what I think was a sensible recommendation regarding Category:Allied occupation of Europe, which has been nominated for deletion at this page. If you can free up a few minutes to read through the discussion, I think your comments would be of real value, given your professional expertise in the field, and your generally judicious approach to the subject. The discussion was opened on July 31, and will probably close in the next day or two. Regards, Cgingold 21:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Saddam1970s.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Saddam1970s.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:30, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Prestes.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Prestes.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 21:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Race science

Hello! Since a merge to Scientific racism did not get consensus, and that this is a POV fork, I've submitted a second Afd request. I hope you can quickly check it out, cheers! Tazmaniacs 17:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SaddamCuellar.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:SaddamCuellar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:AlBakr.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:AlBakr.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:Arbenz.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Arbenz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Featured article review of Congo Free State

Congo Free State has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. — Black Falcon ^(Talk) 20:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wyszyński.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wyszyński.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 22:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BakrSaddam.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BakrSaddam.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:05, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NOR

There has been a big debate over this policy. I think you have valuable experience that makes you an important interlocutor on this matter. I suggest you first go here for a very concise account, and then depending on how much time you have read over the WP:NOR policy and the edit conflicts that led to its being protected, or the last talk to be archived ... or just go straight to the talk page. If you have time - i think it is important Slrubenstein | Talk 16:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAR History of post-Soviet Russia

The History of post-Soviet Russia article has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.--Miyokan 08:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Russiaduma.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Russiaduma.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 00:55, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your article International reactions to the death of Boris Yeltsin

Hi 172. The article "International reactions to the death of Boris Yeltsin" which you created or substantially contributed has been deleted by a motion of afd consensus. Following the general willing of our folks, I've transwikied the article to Wikiquote where its content fits the criteria there. You can view the article here and the credit for initial contributors here. If you want to continue contributing to the article, please come across Wikiquote. Best regards. @pple complain 15:37, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Penelas.jpg

I have tagged Image:Penelas.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Calliopejen1 22:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FDR0415.JPG

I have tagged Image:FDR0415.JPG as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Calliopejen1 04:21, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WorldBankbuilding.jpg

I have tagged Image:WorldBankbuilding.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 16:15, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Getulio55.jpg

I have tagged Image:Getulio55.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 18:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Getulio55.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Getulio55.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 18:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PMChirac.jpg

I have tagged Image:PMChirac.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 00:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]