User talk:170.202.222.1

New messages will appear at the bottom of this page.

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 170.202.222.1, is registered to The St. Paul Travelers Companies Inc. and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

January 2009

Dear 170.202.222.1,
Some of your edits on the page May 6 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 16:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Jonathan Woodgate constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 19:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Emmy Award has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. cf38^talk 18:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you added to March 16, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. The article that you edited has notability guidelines for the addition of birthdays and deaths to the list. Refer to WP:DOY for details on what are acceptable entries in Wikicalendar articles. Thank you. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 20:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Non-profit organization has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Noosentaal^·talk· 15:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Erin Andrews. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KeltieMartinFan (talk) 16:40, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Michael Beasley. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Tim1357 (talk) 18:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

September 2009

Your edits to September 15

Dear 170.202.222.1,
Some of your edits on the page September 15 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 15:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page List of superheroes and villains without superpowers has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Atif.t2 (talk) 20:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mike Ditka, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mike Ditka. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page University of St. Thomas (Minnesota) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Trusilver 20:52, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
If you add defamatory content once again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Gnome de plume (talk) 14:25, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Microsoft SharePoint. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. --M4gnum0n (talk) 16:32, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Acid rain, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Katiker (talk) 00:26, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Rajesh Koothrappali, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 20:49, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Seaman worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 13:46, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Julia Child‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 20:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rockaway Township, New Jersey, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Alansohn (talk) 20:31, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you are reminded not to attack other editors, as you did on Mule with this edit. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you, Windchaser (talk) 19:42, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tshimanga Biakabutuka, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 14:38, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Catfish (film) appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:15, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello! I'm a bot created by another Wikipedia editor. I wanted to let you know that I removed a link that you recently added to the page Son of the Sun (band) here. I did this because http://www.sonofthesunmusic.blogspot.com/ is probably inappropriate for an encyclopedia. We usually avoid linking to blogs, forums, and social media sites.

We appreciate your help in making Wikipedia better for everyone. If I made a mistake, feel free to undo my edit. If you have any questions, you can ask at the Help desk.

Thank you! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:08, 26 November 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Son of the Sun (band), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:05, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The_Real_Housewives_of_Miami#Cristy_Rice, you may be blocked from editing. Your unexplained section blanking of this article on Nov 30 has been reverted. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:21, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Revenge (TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your unexplained section blanking of this article on Jan 5 has been reverted. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 10:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Actions such as removing content from articles without giving any explanation are not helpful, and you have made no attempt at all to explain any of your edits, despite messages here expressing concerns. It is also clear that many, if not all, of the edits from this IP address have been from one person for a considerable period of time. I hope that, when the block expires, you will try to edit in a more collaborative manner, as otherwise there is a likelihood that you will be blocked for much longer. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Skylar Laine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. diff - SyncSeth (talk) 16:55, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Rude Jude, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 17:09, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1998 United States embassy bombings, you may be blocked from editing. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 09:42, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Seychelles , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm YodaRULZ. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Elysburg, Pennsylvania because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! YodaRULZ (talk) 20:27, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Elysburg, Pennsylvania. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 20:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012

Hello, I'm TBrandley. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to J. P. Losman because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. TBr and ley 19:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm The Illusive Man. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Phenylalanine, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, T.I.M^(Contact) 19:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Ghostland Observatory

I believe that you may have inadvertently submitted a test edit in an active article. Please use your sandbox if you would like to experience, or let me know if I am mistaken or you have any questions! Thank you, and happy editing Jackson Peebles (talk) 01:21, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm PhilMacD. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of waterfalls because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! PhilMacD (talk) 22:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Kellie Pickler discography, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hzh (talk) 14:21, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:User page design center/Style, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 10:16, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016

Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Health— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 18:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nick Bonino. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 13:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.