User talk:159.117.189.107

October 2023

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:AMT Hardballer for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 07:27, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

@Loafiewa: - You're being incredibly disingenuous. What I did WAS leaving feedback on why, objectively by their own standards, that person was having a double standard about having the weapon included in a featured in context... when it already had it. You just brushed it off as "a personal attack" (it wasn't) and "it's an old comment" (not relevant since other people have replied recently - which you continue to ignore for reasons I'll get to). You simply didn't like what I said and censored me. You know it. I know it. We both know that we both know it. And here's the biggest problem - which I guarantee you're CONTINUE to ignore because the COMMENT IS STILL THERE RIGHT NOW: Right under my comment, from over a year ago by another user, is the comment "classic wikipedia nazis dictating what is and isnt connected." This SOMEHOW WAS NOT INFLAMMATORY TO YOU WHILE MY INNOCUOUS COMMENT WAS. And, yet, that comment still remains while you over-zealously removed my feedback repeatedly and when publicly called out on it, I know you ran to @ToBeFree: (who, by the way, has a very questionable and unfavorable record from some searching I've done, not surprised) to get me blocked. Again: I know it. You know it. You know that I know it. And you unwittingly proved that random user from over a year ago right by your nonsense. Well, you got your wish. I'm done with Wikipedia because of people like you. And I will look forward to Wikipedia becoming ever more unpopular and criticized, which it is, and falling into obscurity because of behavior like this from its editors and admins. Then god only knows what you'll do with all the hours you spent here playing petty dictator. Have fun, because god knows why but I know you enjoy this.

And, oh, because it SOMEHOW wasn't blatantly obvious, I have not used this account since 2007 and the only reason I used it was because my IP was blocked... and it wasn't even my IP. And because it wasn't even my IP being blocked but somehow was flagged (and, no, I wasn't using a VPN or proxy, by ISP doesn't have those services), I couldn't file an appeal for the block so I looked up my old account info from over 10 years ago. So claiming I was using logged out editing for nefarious purposes is utter nonsense and you know it. Not that you care. 159.117.189.107 (talk) 01:28, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

01:37, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
159.117.189.107 (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:16, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

---