User talk:152.32.113.251

Hallypop (Philippine TV channel)

Hello, Hallypop is a free-to-air channel and not a pay television channel, why? because the network only airs on terrestrial and not on satellite and cable, and we, as a registered users, are based on the availability of the network. In your edit summary, it is because of "GMA Affordabox", but it is a digital terrestrial TV provider box which also consider as a free-to-air television and not a pay television. If your reason is because of pay television's description, "..., but also increasingly via digital terrestrial, and streaming television.", it's still not a reason because if you click digital terrestrial's link, in the description it mentions "terrestrial", which is "free-to-air". Remember as some articles said, "free-to-air television" is for terrestrial especially digital terrestrial television and "pay television" is for cable and satellite; but if you wish you have any reconsiderations proven that a network is a pay television channel, please discuss at the article's talk page. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 03:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand if you are twistedly disagree. If GMA's Hallypop is actually "digital free TV", then you're trying to say that the former digital TV channels of ABS-CBN TV Plus (like Asianovela Channel and Yey!) were never "digital free TV" as you believed? -152.32.113.251 (talk) 03:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@152.32.113.251: They considered as either digital free TV or not, because these channels are encrypted or launching of ABS-CBN TV Plus on 2015 (before, during or after), that's why their descriptions are simply like this: "a Philippine pay television channel created by ABS-CBN and one of the freemium channels of ABS-CBN TVplus." In addition, all descriptions of ABS-CBN TV Plus channels are "pay television channel" and not "free-to-air channel" because of its encryption, though it may considered as free-to-air channel but it still picks as pay television. But as you may know, GMA Affordabox is unencrypted while ABS-CBN TV Plus is encrypted. That's the reason why Hallypop is a free-to-air channel not a pay television channel because its not an encrypted channel. Encryption made channels considered as a pay television, but still considers as a free-to-air television because of its broadcast airing on DTTV. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 04:09, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kapamilya Channel

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use :edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, as you did at Kapamilya Channel and List of programs broadcast by Kapamilya Channel, you may be blocked from editing. -120.29.100.112 (talk) 20:22 , 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Kindly please stop vandalizing unnecessary details as you did at Kapamilya Channel and List of programs broadcast by Kapamilya Channel. This behavior is viewed disruptive editing. Thank You. 120.29.100.112 (talk) 12:07 , 25 September 2020 (UTC)

@120.29.101.112: IP users who are copy-editing/copy-pasting "warning messages" to threaten other editors doesn't work and it's actually redundant. If you disagree with my edits, please keep your problem to yourself and fix your english grammar properly. Thank you. -152.32.113.251 (talk) 05:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You've been engaged alongside 120.29.101.112 in these articles: Kapamilya Channel and List of programs broadcast by Kapamilya Channel. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 10:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The Soulmate Project

Shouldn’t we wait for ABS-CBN to officially announce first if this series will be shelved? Of course there’s no filming because of the pandemic. But let’s wait for an official announcement before you delete this article. That should be fair right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.53.39.52 (talk) 16:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary. We don't need to wait for announcement because there's no more development and news for this project a long time ago. -152.32.113.251 (talk) 08:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

Hi, please do not edit war as you have done at Dreamscape Entertainment both to myself and another editor. You have no support for the changes you have made which have removed all colour from the article including a gallery of free images. It is also now more difficult to navigate and edit with sections in decades instead of years. Overall you have worsened the article to a significant extent and to what purpose?, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 02:22, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My edits were correct and I support the cleaned edits. I didn't mess up the article, I just did a reformat to make it shorter as possible, given that we are in a new decade. It looks like you're very disagree with me because you are highly supportive of Fancruft/Listcruft edits with colored lists and images, along with numerous IP editors. -152.32.113.251 (talk) 02:34, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to want to make the article as dull and boring as possible without the support of any other editor except yourself and are edit warring to achieve that. Coloured lists and images are not list cruft, they improve readability and the visual presentation of the article and as I said putting the sections into decades makes the article harder to navigate and edit, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 02:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually that's not true. If you want articles that are something very fanmade, there's Fandom Wikia for all of that. Thanks. -152.32.113.251 (talk) 03:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you check out some featured lists, such as those for film studios and you will find them chock full of images which have not been removed by featured article reviewers as you have done. There is nothing wrong with colourful articles they are actually encouraged and some even have free public domain videos embedded such as entire silent films, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 03:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An example is List of RKO Pictures films and you can also see that is divided by year rather than by decade, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 03:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What you've said is a bit similar to the articles of various GMA Network's programs and teledramas. -152.32.113.251 (talk) 03:22, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.