User talk:142.184.158.195

Hi, hoping to catch you before your IP number changes... thanks for your edits to the Sicilians article. Maybe you could take a look at Talk:Sicilians#Unsourced and copypasted material. The IP user at 49.188.* has made a large number of unsourced and dubious edits over the past month or two, and has so far refused to communicate. My knowledge of the subject is not that good, so all I could suggest was to revert the article to before they started editing. Maybe you'd like to comment there? Thanks... --IamNotU (talk) 01:36, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

I left a comment there. I also have reverted or corrected several of their edits, but not all. He/she refuses to discuss anything though, so some warnings should be left on that their talk page, including to follow WP:BRD. 142.184.158.195 (talk) 01:41, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks... I've left several warnings on their talk pages recently, up to a level 3 about unsourced edits, next would be a final warning then a block. If so, or in any case, I'm not sure what should come next. They've made several hundred edits in a short time, almost all unsourced. I can't check them all, and in any case I don't know that much about the subject. It looked to me like most or all had problems, and seeing your reverts and comments reinforces that impression. Do you have a sense of whether there is anything of theirs really worth keeping, going through with a fine-toothed comb, or would it be better to just go back to the last stable version of the article? --IamNotU (talk) 02:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

The current form of the article is fine. If they keep making disrupting edits without discussion or proper attribution, then further reverts and warnings can be made. Not all of the edits have been without merit or citation. 142.184.158.195 (talk) 02:32, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

---