User talk:1367Jaen

Welcome!

Hi 1367Jaen! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! R Prazeres (talk) 08:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi 1367Jaen, I just wanted to let you know I reverted one of your recent edits to the Córdoba article because it was not supported by sources. Even if the material is accurate, on Wikipedia all significant content must be attributed to reliable sources: see the Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources polices for more details on what that means, and you can find more info on how to add citations at Wikipedia:Citing sources. I noticed you're also drafting some articles about a siege of Cordoba in 1277 and the capture of Beja in 1172, but they also lack sources; if you want them accepted for publication, you'll probably need to add appropriate citations for all the information you wrote. Keep in mind also that the sources should be reliable and current, so the Rawd al-Qirtas, for example, which is an old historic text, is not the best choice; you should try to cite some secondary sources such as modern historians. If you have other questions, feel free to ask. Happy editing, R Prazeres (talk) 08:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thanks for your comments. The Capture of Beja is actually backed up by the work of the well-known Egyptian historian of the 20th Century, Muhammad Anaan whose book on ‘Al-Andalus’ is based on many sources both Arabic & Spanish. I believe it is a sufficient reference. 1367Jaen (talk) 09:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://ar.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/محمد_عبد_الله_عنان 1367Jaen (talk) 09:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a good start (and it might be sufficient for publishing, depending on the reviewer's assessment), but in the long term each article would need more than one source, even if the first source is reliable. In the meantime, if all information is supported by the same source, make sure you still add multiple inline citations to make this clear; typically, for example, adding one at the end of each paragraph is sufficient (see Wikipedia:Citing sources again for any more specifics). This also makes it easier to keep track of things later, because other editors may add their own content with their own sources afterward, so if there was previously only one footnote in the whole article it will become unclear which parts are supported by the original source. Hope this helps, R Prazeres (talk) 09:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boris Johnson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Czello 14:46, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but nothing of what I said was untrue… 1367Jaen (talk) 14:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia isn't the place for your personal opinions on the matter. — Czello 14:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Aintabli. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Antakya, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aintabli (talk) 00:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hi 1367Jaen! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Boris Johnson that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. I also reverted the edit as it makes a major claim without much in the way of credible sourcing. I would expect such a claim to have multiple solid sources. If you want to gather some additional sources to corroborate it then you can make a suggestion on the Talk page. DanielRigal (talk) 23:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Cordoba (1277) (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A single source isn't enough to support an article.

Some of the information is unreferenced.

The offline source is cited in a way which makes verification difficult or impossible. Please see WP:OFFLINE for advice on citing offline sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siege of Cordoba (1277) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1367Jaen! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Boris Johnson

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Boris Johnson, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:10, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Capture of Beja ( 1172 )

Hello, 1367Jaen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Capture of Beja ( 1172 ), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Capture of Beja ( 1172 )

Hello, 1367Jaen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Capture of Beja".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:07, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:41, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to High Speed 2—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:26, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Cordoba (1277)

Hello, 1367Jaen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Cordoba (1277), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Siege of Cordoba (1277)

Hello, 1367Jaen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siege of Cordoba".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]