User talk:132Lemons132

Stop changing the plot of Miraculous

I don't want to sound rude or anything, but the reason why I and others keep removing your changes is because it doesn't sound appropriate for Wikipedia, even if you think it is better. First of all, from a writing perspective, it doesn't sound like the formal tone of an encyclopedia or textbook. Secondly, it contains too much information. These Wikipedia pages are for people who are not fans of Miraculous and want to know more about the show. They don't need to know how Cat Noir felt about Cataclysming Monarch, just the fact that he scarred him, because that's the only thing important for the plot. Lastly, even though the plot contains substantial descriptions about the characters, just like any well-written Wikipedia plot summary, there is no need to call it "Plot and Characters". That's just how Wikipedia standards work. I hope you understand. Miracusaurs (talk) 02:38, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you i will change it back to how it was but I would only argue to keep the "Story" Heading. Anyways, I have changed back to the edit you made a couple of days ago thank you I will leave this Miraculous Ladybug article to you...Keep it coming. Goodbye! 132Lemons132 (talk) 12:06, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

chilll out 132Lemons132 (talk) 17:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum

there was draft of Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum by --Sunuraju (talk) 11:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello 132Lemons132. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:132Lemons132. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=132Lemons132|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 13:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i dont want money i just want to edit dude. - im not being compensated kay? 132Lemons132 (talk) 15:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just like the drama, I am not being compensated or anything! 132Lemons132 (talk) 19:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ridiculous 132Lemons132 (talk) 08:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

132Lemons132 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here 132Lemons132 (talk) 08:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. Only one open request is needed. 331dot (talk) 08:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

132Lemons132 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

IM NOT ANYTHING? I Have not done anything i dont understand what your talking about with me being a sock or a fake account, i just want to help the community, seriously.132Lemons132 (talk) 08:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 08:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unban

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

132Lemons132 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this rory smith guy is ignorant, he just said i am a sock and ruined my account of 2 years for what? i dont understand this is my only account man! every accusation he has made is a lie, unbelievable, i guess no power = no say 132Lemons132 (talk) 08:17, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Requests with personal attacks are not considered. 331dot (talk) 08:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sorry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

132Lemons132 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Dont feel like my block is correct, i deny everything said about me. Few days ago i made a big edit about a tv serial and since then ive been getting messages on messages about me being a 'sock'? and being compensated and so on. i apologize if i have done anything wrong, ive also been told this is some fake account or something. this is my only account of 2 years! please forgive me! regards. also sorry for making many unblocks requests. 132Lemons132 (talk) 08:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Closing extra request. asilvering (talk) 21:03, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

132Lemons132 (talk) 08:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technical data is not particularly helpful in this case. --Yamla (talk) 13:20, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can i request for my case to be re opened? 132Lemons132 (talk) 16:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sincerely

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

132Lemons132 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Forgive me, i think my ban is inccorect, i havent done any of such allegations on me, sock? or whatever, just forgive me for what i did, i just want to edit on my account. sincerely. 132Lemons132 (talk) 18:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:18, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

132Lemons132 (talk) 18:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

132Lemons132 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I was blocked for alleged sockpuppetry. I did not intend to violate any rules and now fully understand Wikipedia’s policies. I assure you that I will not engage in disruptive behavior and will focus on constructive contributions. Please reconsider my block. 132Lemons132 (talk) 12:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand that I was blocked for alleged sockpuppetry. I did not intend to violate any rules and now fully understand Wikipedia’s policies. I assure you that I will not engage in disruptive behavior and will focus on constructive contributions. Please reconsider my block. [[User:132Lemons132|132Lemons132]] ([[User talk:132Lemons132#top|talk]]) 12:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that I was blocked for alleged sockpuppetry. I did not intend to violate any rules and now fully understand Wikipedia’s policies. I assure you that I will not engage in disruptive behavior and will focus on constructive contributions. Please reconsider my block. [[User:132Lemons132|132Lemons132]] ([[User talk:132Lemons132#top|talk]]) 12:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that I was blocked for alleged sockpuppetry. I did not intend to violate any rules and now fully understand Wikipedia’s policies. I assure you that I will not engage in disruptive behavior and will focus on constructive contributions. Please reconsider my block. [[User:132Lemons132|132Lemons132]] ([[User talk:132Lemons132#top|talk]]) 12:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

132Lemons132 (talk) 12:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]