User talk:12george1/Archive 12

DYK RfC

As a listed GA participant, you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should be eligible to appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Thank you in advance. Gilderien Chat|Contributions02:53, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1985 Atlantic hurricane season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flores Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:03, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1996 Atlantic hurricane season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

/www.cdmha.org/toolkit/cdmha-rltk/PUBLICATIONS/FP6150-99/6150b.doc|format=[[DOC (computing)|DOC]]}}>
hurricane season,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/G1.html|title=Subject: G1) When is hurricane season ?|last=Dorst|first=Neal|date=January 21, 2010|publisher=[[National

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:02, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1855 Atlantic hurricane season

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article 1855 Atlantic hurricane season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:39, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1985 Atlantic hurricane season

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article 1985 Atlantic hurricane season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Yellow Evan -- Yellow Evan (talk) 01:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1985 Atlantic hurricane season

The article 1985 Atlantic hurricane season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1985 Atlantic hurricane season for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Yellow Evan -- Yellow Evan (talk) 02:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1855 Atlantic hurricane season

I have promoted this to GA. Congratulations! The review follows. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 10:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1855 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adam Cuerden (talk · contribs) 23:31, 8 August 2013 (UTC) Lead[reply]

"The 1855 Atlantic hurricane season featured no tropical cyclone landfalls on the East Coast of the United States" - This should NOT be the first sentence of the article; focus on where they did land, or the relative paucity of known hurricanes, THEN mention where they did not.

Better?--12george1 (talk) 19:33, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Much. Thank you. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 06:39, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Other

You mention a downgraded hurricane in the lead, but nowhere else. This needs summarised in the article.

Are you asking me to mention that downgraded hurricane as a separate section or something like that?--12george1 (talk) 19:33, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It would seem to make sense, and should explain why it was rejected, if at all possible. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 06:39, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done--12george1 (talk) 02:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This has somewhat of a paucity of sources. The secondary sources mention the New York Times; all the New York Times articles are available online for free, and would be worth using to add detail.

Better?--12george1 (talk) 19:33, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks better, aye. I mean, this is always going to be a short article, but may as well include relevant bits... Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 06:39, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 23:31, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, obviously, this is an article where there's a limited amount of information to use. But I'm happy it's a good, complete description of the subject. Pass. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 09:58, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1855 Atlantic hurricane season

The article 1855 Atlantic hurricane season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1855 Atlantic hurricane season for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Edouard (2008)

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Tropical Storm Edouard (2008) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 14:56, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Edouard (2008)

The article Tropical Storm Edouard (2008) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tropical Storm Edouard (2008) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 02:07, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1998 Atlantic hurricane season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1998 Atlantic hurricane season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Yellow Evan -- Yellow Evan (talk) 18:55, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1998 Atlantic hurricane season

The article 1998 Atlantic hurricane season you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:1998 Atlantic hurricane season for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Yellow Evan -- Yellow Evan (talk) 19:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1996 Atlantic hurricane season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1996 Atlantic hurricane season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of TheAustinMan -- TheAustinMan (talk) 22:25, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1924 Atlantic hurricane season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1924 Atlantic hurricane season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Yellow Evan -- Yellow Evan (talk) 23:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1924 Atlantic hurricane season

The article 1924 Atlantic hurricane season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1924 Atlantic hurricane season for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Yellow Evan -- Yellow Evan (talk) 03:27, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Bonnie (1986)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hurricane Bonnie (1986) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 19:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Bonnie (1986)

The article Hurricane Bonnie (1986) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hurricane Bonnie (1986) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 13:37, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2013 August newsletter

This year's final is upon us. Our final eight, in order of last round's score, are:

Hawkeye7 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer who has contributed on topics of military history and physics, including a number of high-importance topics. Good articles have made up the bulk of his points, but he has also scored a great deal of bonus points. He has the second highest score overall so far, with more than 3000 points accumulated.
Casliber (submissions), another WikiCup veteran who reached the finals in 2012, 2011 and 2010. He writes on a variety of topics including botany, mycology and astronomy, and has claimed the highest or joint highest number of featured articles every round so far this year. He has the third highest score overall, with just under 3000 points accumulated.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 WikiCup champion, who writes mostly on marine biology. She has also contributed to high-importance topics, seeing huge numbers of bonus points for high-importance featured and good articles. Previous rounds have seen her scoring the most bonus points, with scoring spread across did you knows, good articles and featured articles.
Sasata (submissions), a WikiCup veteran who finished in second place in 2012, and competed as early as 2009. He writes articles on biology, especially mycology, and has scored highly for a number of collaborations at featured article candidates.
Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), the winner of the 2010 competition. His contributions mostly concern Naval history, and he has scored a very large number of points for good articles and good article reviews in every round. He is the highest scorer overall this year, with over 3500 points in total.
Ealdgyth (submissions), who is competing in the WikiCup for the second time, though this will be her first time in the final. A regular at FAC, she is mostly interested in British medieval history, and has scored very highly for some top-importance featured articles on the topic.
Miyagawa (submissions), a finalist in 2012 and 2011. He writes on a broad variety of topics, with many of this year's points coming from good articles about Star Trek. Good articles make up the bulk of his points, and he had the most good articles back in round 2; he was also the highest scorer for DYK in rounds 1 and 2.
Adam Cuerden (submissions) has previously been involved with the WikiCup, but hasn't participated for a number of years. He scores mostly from restoration work leading to featured picture credits, but has also done some article writing and reviewing.

We say goodbye to eight great participants who did not qualify for the final: Piotrus (submissions), Figureskatingfan (submissions), ThaddeusB (submissions), Dana boomer (submissions), Status (submissions), Ed! (submissions), 12george1 (submissions), Calvin999 (submissions). Having made it to this stage is still an excellent achievement, and you can leave with your heads held high. We hope to see you all again next year. Signups are now open for the 2014 WikiCup, which will begin on 1 January. All Wikipedians, whatever their interest or level of experience, are warmly invited to participate in next year's competition.

This last month has seen some incredible contributions; for instance, Cwmhiraeth's Starfish and Ealdgyth's Battle of Hastings—two highly important, highly viewed pages—made it to featured article status. It would be all too easy to focus solely on these stunning achievements at the expense of those participants working in lower-scoring areas, when in fact all WikiCup participants are doing excellent work. A mention of everything done is impossible, but here are a few: Last round saw the completion of several good topics (on the 1958, 1959 and 1962 Atlantic hurricane seasons) to which 12george1 had contributed. Calvin999 saw "S&M" (song), on which he has been working for several years, through to featured article status on its tenth try. Figureskatingfan continued towards her goal of a broad featured/good topic on Maya Angelou, with two featured and four good articles. ThaddeusB contributed significantly to over 20 articles which appeared on the main page's "in the news" section. Adam Cuerden continued to restore a large number of historical images, resulting in over a dozen FP credits this round alone. The WikiCup is not just about top-importance featured articles, and the work of all of these users is worthy of commendation.

Finally, the usual notices: If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 05:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1899 Atlantic hurricane season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1899 Atlantic hurricane season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 05:15, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1977 Atlantic hurricane season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1977 Atlantic hurricane season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 19:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1977 Atlantic hurricane season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tropical Storm Grace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1977 Atlantic hurricane season

The article 1977 Atlantic hurricane season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1977 Atlantic hurricane season for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 04:43, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]